Histogram of kidney stones on non-contrast computed tomography to predict successful stone dusting during retrograde intrarenal surgery
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Y. Kohjimoto,et al. Three-dimensional mean stone density on non-contrast computed tomography can predict ureteroscopic lithotripsy outcome in ureteral stone cases , 2020, Urolithiasis.
[2] M. Bultitude,et al. Dusting, fragmenting, popcorning or dustmenting? , 2019, Current opinion in urology.
[3] Y. Kohjimoto,et al. Three‐dimensional mean stone density measurement is superior for predicting extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success , 2018, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.
[4] Dirk Lange,et al. Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy: A Review of Dusting vs Fragmentation with Extraction. , 2017, Journal of endourology.
[5] A. Trinchieri,et al. Clinical utility of computed tomography Hounsfield characterization for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a cross-sectional study , 2017, BMC Urology.
[6] B. Somani,et al. Worldwide Trends of Urinary Stone Disease Treatment Over the Last Two Decades: A Systematic Review. , 2017, Journal of endourology.
[7] M. Pearle,et al. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. , 2016, The Journal of urology.
[8] Dae Hun Lee,et al. Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[9] T. Knoll,et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. , 2016, European urology.
[10] M. Pearle,et al. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II. , 2016, The Journal of urology.
[11] Francesco Sanguedolce,et al. Contemporary Practice Patterns of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Treating Renal Stones: Results of a Worldwide Survey. , 2015, Journal of endourology.
[12] D. Bell,et al. Hounsfield Unit , 2015, Definitions.
[13] M. Cho,et al. Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? , 2015, Korean journal of urology.
[14] Olivier Traxer,et al. In vitro fragmentation efficiency of holmium: yttrium‐aluminum‐garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy – a comprehensive study encompassing different frequencies, pulse energies, total power levels and laser fibre diameters , 2014, BJU international.
[15] S. Aksoy,et al. Are Hounsfield densities of ureteral stones a predictive factor for effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? , 2014, International journal of clinical and experimental medicine.
[16] M. Abbar,et al. The usefulness of stone density and patient stoutness in predicting extracorporeal shock wave efficiency: Results in a North African ethnic group. , 2013, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.
[17] M. Binbay,et al. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2–4 cm stones: a matched‐pair analysis , 2012, BJU international.
[18] M. Monga,et al. Preoperative stone attenuation value predicts success after shock wave lithotripsy in children. , 2010, The Journal of urology.
[19] M. Prabhakar. Retrograde ureteroscopic intrarenal surgery for large (1.6-3.5 cm) upper ureteric/renal calculus , 2010, Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India.
[20] S. Nakada,et al. Stone measurement by volumetric three‐dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy , 2009, BJU international.
[21] C. Thaxton,et al. Radiographic parameters on noncontrast computerized tomography predictive of shock wave lithotripsy success. , 2008, The Journal of urology.
[22] R. Paterson,et al. Cystine calculi: correlation of CT-visible structure, CT number, and stone morphology with fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy , 2007, Urological Research.
[23] J. Teichman,et al. Shock wave lithotripsy correlates with stone density on preoperative computerized tomography. , 2007, The Journal of urology.
[24] J. Lingeman,et al. CT visible internal stone structure, but not Hounsfield unit value, of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) calculi predicts lithotripsy fragility in vitro , 2007, Urological Research.
[25] A. El-Assmy,et al. A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. , 2007, European urology.
[26] J. Lingeman,et al. Using Helical CT to Predict Stone Fragility in Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL). , 2007, AIP conference proceedings.
[27] S. Yoshida,et al. Role of volume and attenuation value histogram of urinary stone on noncontrast helical computed tomography as predictor of fragility by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. , 2006, Urology.
[28] S. Kommu,et al. Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi , 2005, BJU international.
[29] N. Gupta,et al. Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi , 2005, BJU international.