Histogram of kidney stones on non-contrast computed tomography to predict successful stone dusting during retrograde intrarenal surgery

[1]  Y. Kohjimoto,et al.  Three-dimensional mean stone density on non-contrast computed tomography can predict ureteroscopic lithotripsy outcome in ureteral stone cases , 2020, Urolithiasis.

[2]  M. Bultitude,et al.  Dusting, fragmenting, popcorning or dustmenting? , 2019, Current opinion in urology.

[3]  Y. Kohjimoto,et al.  Three‐dimensional mean stone density measurement is superior for predicting extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success , 2018, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[4]  Dirk Lange,et al.  Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy: A Review of Dusting vs Fragmentation with Extraction. , 2017, Journal of endourology.

[5]  A. Trinchieri,et al.  Clinical utility of computed tomography Hounsfield characterization for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a cross-sectional study , 2017, BMC Urology.

[6]  B. Somani,et al.  Worldwide Trends of Urinary Stone Disease Treatment Over the Last Two Decades: A Systematic Review. , 2017, Journal of endourology.

[7]  M. Pearle,et al.  Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. , 2016, The Journal of urology.

[8]  Dae Hun Lee,et al.  Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[9]  T. Knoll,et al.  EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. , 2016, European urology.

[10]  M. Pearle,et al.  Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II. , 2016, The Journal of urology.

[11]  Francesco Sanguedolce,et al.  Contemporary Practice Patterns of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Treating Renal Stones: Results of a Worldwide Survey. , 2015, Journal of endourology.

[12]  D. Bell,et al.  Hounsfield Unit , 2015, Definitions.

[13]  M. Cho,et al.  Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? , 2015, Korean journal of urology.

[14]  Olivier Traxer,et al.  In vitro fragmentation efficiency of holmium: yttrium‐aluminum‐garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy – a comprehensive study encompassing different frequencies, pulse energies, total power levels and laser fibre diameters , 2014, BJU international.

[15]  S. Aksoy,et al.  Are Hounsfield densities of ureteral stones a predictive factor for effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? , 2014, International journal of clinical and experimental medicine.

[16]  M. Abbar,et al.  The usefulness of stone density and patient stoutness in predicting extracorporeal shock wave efficiency: Results in a North African ethnic group. , 2013, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[17]  M. Binbay,et al.  Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2–4 cm stones: a matched‐pair analysis , 2012, BJU international.

[18]  M. Monga,et al.  Preoperative stone attenuation value predicts success after shock wave lithotripsy in children. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[19]  M. Prabhakar.  Retrograde ureteroscopic intrarenal surgery for large (1.6-3.5 cm) upper ureteric/renal calculus , 2010, Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India.

[20]  S. Nakada,et al.  Stone measurement by volumetric three‐dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy , 2009, BJU international.

[21]  C. Thaxton,et al.  Radiographic parameters on noncontrast computerized tomography predictive of shock wave lithotripsy success. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[22]  R. Paterson,et al.  Cystine calculi: correlation of CT-visible structure, CT number, and stone morphology with fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy , 2007, Urological Research.

[23]  J. Teichman,et al.  Shock wave lithotripsy correlates with stone density on preoperative computerized tomography. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[24]  J. Lingeman,et al.  CT visible internal stone structure, but not Hounsfield unit value, of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) calculi predicts lithotripsy fragility in vitro , 2007, Urological Research.

[25]  A. El-Assmy,et al.  A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. , 2007, European urology.

[26]  J. Lingeman,et al.  Using Helical CT to Predict Stone Fragility in Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL). , 2007, AIP conference proceedings.

[27]  S. Yoshida,et al.  Role of volume and attenuation value histogram of urinary stone on noncontrast helical computed tomography as predictor of fragility by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. , 2006, Urology.

[28]  S. Kommu,et al.  Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi , 2005, BJU international.

[29]  N. Gupta,et al.  Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi , 2005, BJU international.