Retained foreign bodies after surgery.

BACKGROUND Medical errors during surgery are not well studied. To define risk factors associated with this type of error, we performed a case control analysis. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed medical records involving the ICD-9 code (998.4) for unintentional foreign object remaining in the body during surgery and incident reports gathered by the Department of Risk Management over a 10 year period from 1996 to 2005. Thirty cases were matched with at least four randomly selected controls (131 control patients) that underwent the same type of operation during the same time period. RESULTS Thirty patients had retained foreign objects (52% sponges and 43% instruments). The abdominal cavity was most commonly involved (46%) followed by the thoracic cavity (23%) although no body cavity remained uninvolved. Eight patients required readmission (30%), 25 patients required reoperation (83%), and there was no mortality. When compared with controls, patients with retained foreign objects were more likely to have had a greater number of major surgical procedures at the same time (2.7 versus 1.8, P=0.004), to have multiple surgical teams (13% versus 2%, P=0.02), and more likely to have had an incorrect instrument/sponge count recorded (13% versus 2%, P=0.01). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with a significantly higher risk of retained foreign objects were the total number of major procedures performed [odds ratio 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-2.3; P=0.008] and an incorrect count (odds ratio 16.2; 95% CI, 1.3-197.8; P=0.02). CONCLUSION Retained foreign objects after surgery are associated with multiple major surgical procedures being performed at the same time and an incorrect instrument or sponge count. Identification of these risk factors using case-control analysis should influence operating room policy and reduce these types of errors.

[1]  M. Funke,et al.  CT of retained surgical sponges (textilomas): pitfalls in detection and evaluation. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  R. Riley,et al.  Identifying lost surgical needles using radiographic techniques. , 2003, AORN journal.

[3]  T. Suwatanapongched,et al.  Intrathoracic gossypiboma: radiographic and CT findings. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  J. Moul,et al.  Gossypiboma (retained surgical sponge) and recurrent bladder neck contracture after radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[5]  E. John Orav,et al.  Risk Factors for Retained Instruments and Sponges after Surgery , 2003 .

[6]  K. McDonald,et al.  Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. , 2001, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[7]  A. Wall,et al.  Book ReviewTo Err is Human: building a safer health system Kohn L T Corrigan J M Donaldson M S Washington DC USA: Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press ISBN 0 309 06837 1 $34.95 , 2000 .

[8]  K. Maull,et al.  Natural History of the Retained Surgical Sponge , 1982, Southern medical journal.

[9]  S. Friedman,et al.  The retained surgical sponge. , 1996, Annals of surgery.

[10]  H. Lubetsky,et al.  Retained surgical sponge simulating a pancreatic mass. , 1979, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[11]  Carl E Fabian,et al.  Electronic tagging of surgical sponges to prevent their accidental retention. , 2005, Surgery.

[12]  Tsai Yuh-Feng,et al.  FDG PET CT features of an intraabdominal gossypiboma. , 2005, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[13]  J Gosbee,et al.  Human factors engineering design demonstrations can enlighten your RCA team , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[14]  Rajpal Singh,et al.  Gossypiboma: its laparoscopic diagnosis and removal. , 2004, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[15]  W Rappaport,et al.  The retained surgical sponge following intra-abdominal surgery. A continuing problem. , 1990, Archives of surgery.

[16]  R. McLeod,et al.  Canadian Association of General Surgeons Evidence Based Reviews in Surgery. 9. Risk factors for retained foreign bodies after surgery. , 2004, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[17]  A. Engel,et al.  A new pitfall on abdominal PET/CT: a retained surgical sponge. , 2004, Journal of computer assisted tomography.