Assessing the efficacy of online teaching with the Constructivist online learning environment survey

Teachers of science, mathematics and technology Australia wide are being required to transform their established epistemologies of practice in order to engage learners as active conceptualisers within socially interactive learning environments. Many teachers are enrolling in postgraduate distance education programs to assist them with this challenging task. Curtin University is responding by using computer mediated communication to speed up the exchange of distance study materials and to provide online interactive learning environments (via chat groups, bulletin boards and email). For the past three years, the authors have been using the Internet to teach online Masters degree students studying at a distance from Curtin. The major pedagogical goal is to engage students (professional teachers) in reflective and collaborative learning. The web sites provide Activity Rooms in which the teachers engage students in frequent and focused discourse with each other and with their online tutors. As reflective teachers, the authors are keen to evaluate their own innovative practices and constantly improve them. To this end, they have designed the Constructivist On-Line Learning Environment Survey (COLLES), an electronic questionnaire that enables them to readily monitor each student's preferred online learning environment and compare it with her/his actual experiences. In this presentation, they outline the rationale of the questionnaire and present some preliminary analyses that illustrate its usefulness. [Author abstract, ed] Teachers of science, mathematics and technology Australia wide are being required to transform their established epistemologies of practice in order to engage learners as active conceptualisers within socially interactive learning environments. Many teachers are enrolling in postgraduate distance education programs to assist them with this challenging task. Curtin University is responding by using computer mediated communication to speed up the exchange of distance study materials and to provide online interactive learning environments (via chat groups, bulletin boards and email). For the past three years, the Internet has been used to teach online Masters degree students studying at a distance from Curtin. The major pedagogical goal is to engage the students (professional teachers) in reflective and collaborative learning. Curtin's web sites provide Activity Rooms in which students are engaged in frequent and focused discourse with each other and with their online tutors. To evaluate and improve on their teaching practice, the academic staff designed the Constructivist On-Line Learning Environment Survey (COLLES), an electronic questionnaire that enables them to readily monitor each student's preferred online learning environment and compare it with her/his actual experiences. This paper outlines the rationale of the questionnaire and presents some preliminary analyses that illustrate its usefulness.

[1]  P. Taylor,et al.  Establishing open and critical discourses in the science classroom: Reflecting on initial difficulties , 1998 .

[2]  Dorit Maor,et al.  Teacher epistemology and scientific inquiry in computerized classroom environments , 1995 .

[3]  Darrell L. Fisher,et al.  Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments , 1997 .

[4]  A. Sfard On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One , 1998 .

[5]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  Classroom Environment Instruments: Development, Validity and Applications , 1998 .

[6]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Research for educational Communications and Technology , 1997 .

[7]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[8]  Elizabeth J. Burge,et al.  Learning in a computer conferenced contexts: The learner''s perspective , 2008 .

[9]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Student and Teacher Perspectives in Computer-Mediated Learning Environments in Teacher Education , 1999 .

[10]  Martin Hughes Teaching and Learning in Changing Times , 1996 .

[11]  William E. Blanton,et al.  Chapter 7: Telecommunications and Teacher Education: A Social Constructivist Review , 1998 .

[12]  Dorit Maor How does one evaluate students' participation and interaction in an Internet based unit? , 1998 .

[13]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  Technology's promises and dangers in a psychological and educational context , 1998 .

[14]  A. W. Bates,et al.  The impact of technological change on open and distance learning , 1997 .

[15]  Peter Charles Taylor,et al.  The revised CLES: A questionnaire for educators interested in the constructivist reform of school science and mathematics , 1994 .

[16]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  International handbook of science education , 1998 .

[17]  Dorit Maor Professional development program to enhance teachers' understanding of the use of constructivist multi-media learning environment , 1997 .

[18]  Peter Charles Taylor,et al.  Classroom learning environments under transformation: A constructivist perspective , 1995 .

[19]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Constructivism: Implications for the Design and Delivery of Instruction , 1996 .

[20]  Dorit Maor Teacher and student reflections on interactions in an Internet based-unit , 1999 .

[21]  A. L. Brown Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[22]  A. Stapleton,et al.  Virtual teaching or virtually teaching? Does Internet-based teaching require multiple metaphors of mind? , 1999 .

[23]  R. Owston Research news and Comment: The World Wide Web: A Technology to Enhance Teaching and Learning? , 1997 .

[24]  Daniel V. Eastmond Alone but Together: Adult Distance Study through Computer Conferencing , 1995 .

[25]  M. C. O'Connor,et al.  Can We Trace the "Efficacy of Social Constructivism"? , 1998 .