Binaural technology for application to active noise reduction communication headsets: design considerations

This article examines the fundamental basis and the technical aspects involved in integrating two emerging technologies in the design of communication headsets for use in noisy environments. The first technology, active noise reduction (ANR), can improve signal detection and speech intelligibility by reducing the amount of interfering noise from the environment. The second technology, known as binaural technology, allows the creation of 3D auditory displays, which can improve signal detection and speech intelligibility in noise, and situational awareness, over monaural listening. For an optimal integration of binaural technology into ANR headsets, digital devices are preferred over analog devices. The complexity of the integrated system, particularly the features of the binaural simulation, is found to be largely dependent on the specific demands of the application targeted. Two extreme cases relevant to an aircraft cockpit environment are analyzed. The greatest benefit is likely to be found in situations of divided attention listening in relatively low signal-to-noise environments.

[1]  H. Wallach,et al.  The role of head movements and vestibular and visual cues in sound localization. , 1940 .

[2]  J. Schroeter,et al.  The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part II: Modeling the external ear, simulating bone conduction, and comparing test fixture and real-ear data. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  E H Berger,et al.  Technology advancements in hearing protection circa 1995: active noise reduction, frequency/amplitude-sensitivity, and uniform attenuation. , 1996, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[4]  D. L. Spencer,et al.  Active noise reduction versus conventional hearing protection. Relative benefits for normal-hearing and impaired listeners. , 1997, Scandinavian audiology.

[5]  E. Shaw Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  L. Rabiner,et al.  Binaural release from masking for speech and gain in intelligibility. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R Plomp,et al.  The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  A. J. Brammer,et al.  Opportunities for active noise control in communication headsets , 1998 .

[9]  S. Abel,et al.  Sound localization. The interaction of aging, hearing loss and hearing protection. , 1996, Scandinavian audiology.

[10]  D R Begault,et al.  Head-Up Auditory Displays for Traffic Collision Avoidance System Advisories: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993, Human factors.

[11]  Daniel W. Gower,et al.  Speech Intelligibility and Protective Effectiveness of Selected Active Noise Reduction and Conventional Communications Headsets , 1994, Human factors.

[12]  Nathaniel I. Durlach,et al.  On the Externalization of Auditory Images , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[13]  F L Wightman,et al.  Headphone simulation of free-field listening. II: Psychophysical validation. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Dorte Hammershøi,et al.  Binaural Technique: Do We Need Individual Recordings? , 1996 .

[15]  R L McKinley,et al.  3-dimensional auditory displays: development, applications, and performance. , 1994, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[16]  Henrik Møller,et al.  Transfer characteristics of headphones measured on human ears , 1995 .

[17]  Henrik Møller Fundamentals of binaural technology , 1991 .

[18]  M. Ericson,et al.  The Intelligibility of Multiple Talkers Separated Spatially in Noise , 2001 .

[19]  H. J.M. Steeneken Personal Active Noise Reduction with integrated Speech Communication devices: development and assessment. , 1998, Noise & health.

[20]  Adelbert W. Bronkhorst,et al.  Application of a Three-Dimensional Auditory Display in a Flight Task , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[21]  R. Plomp,et al.  Binaural speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  L. Rabiner,et al.  Predicting binaural gain in intelligibility and release from masking for speech. , 1967, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  J. Blauert Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization , 1983 .

[24]  R Plomp,et al.  Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Michael Friis Sørensen,et al.  Head-Related Transfer Functions of Human Subjects , 1995 .

[26]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Effect of the orientation of the speaker's head and azimuth of a noise source on the speech reception threshold for sentences , 1980 .

[27]  William A. Yost,et al.  Spatial hearing: The psychophysics of human sound localization, revised edition , 1998 .

[28]  G. R. Arrabito,et al.  Results of a survey on audio and visual warning systems for military helicopters , 1998 .

[29]  F L Wightman,et al.  Resolution of front-back ambiguity in spatial hearing by listener and source movement. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.