Aerodynamic Response of a Hovering Rotor to Ramp Change in Pitch Input

Under transient conditions, a helicopter rotor generates a complex, time-dependent pattern of shed and trailed vorticity in its wake that has profound effects on its loading. To examine these effects, the response of a two-bladed hovering rotor to a ramp change in collective pitch is investigated using three different computational approaches. Solutions obtained using a Compressible Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes approach are compared to results obtained from lifting-line theory coupled to an Eulerian Vorticity Transport Model, and from a simple single-state dynamic inflow model. The different numerical approaches yield very similar predictions of the thrust response of the rotor to ramp changes in collective pitch, as long as the ramp rates are small. This suggests that the basic underlying flow physics is properly represented by all the approaches. For more rapid ramp rates, an additional delay in the aerodynamic response of the rotor, that is related to the finite extent of the wake during its early history, is predicted by the Navier-Stokes and Vorticity Transport approaches. Even though the evolution of the wake of the rotor is strongly three dimensional and highly unsteady, the predictions of the Navier-Stokes and lifting-line models agree very closely as long as the blades of the rotor do not stall. In the pre-stall regime, a quasi two-dimensional representation of the blade aerodynamics thus appears adequate for predicting the performance of such systems even under highly transient conditions. When flow separation occurs, the resulting three dimensionality of the blade aerodynamics forces the predictions of the Navier-Stokes and lifting-line approaches to diverge, however. The characterization of the wake interactions and stall propagation mechanisms that are presented in this study offers some insight into the fundamental fluid dynamic mechanisms that govern the transient aerodynamic response of a rotor to control inputs, and provides some quantication of the limits of applicability of some popular current approaches to rotor aerodynamic analysis.

[1]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[2]  Inderjit Chopra,et al.  Review of Rotor Loads Prediction with the Emergence of Rotorcraft CFD , 2007 .

[3]  Meng-Sing Liou,et al.  An Accurate and Robust Flux Splitting Scheme for Shock and Contact Discontinuities , 1997, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[4]  Jeffrey T. Onufer,et al.  A diagonalized diagonal dominant alternating direction implicit (D3ADI) scheme and subiteration correction , 1998 .

[5]  Richard E. Brown,et al.  Efficient High-Resolution Wake Modeling Using the Vorticity Transport Equation , 2004 .

[6]  Paul J Carpenter,et al.  Effect of a Rapid Blade-Pitch Increase on the Thrust and Induced-Velocity Response of a Full-Scale Helicopter Rotor , 1953 .

[7]  Xin,et al.  Application of CFD/CSD Coupling for Analysis of Rotorcraft Airloads and Blade Loads in Maneuvering Flight , 2007 .

[8]  Datta,et al.  Comprehensive Analysis, Prediction, and Validation of UH-60A Blade Loads in Unsteady Maneuvering Flight , 2007 .

[9]  F. X. Caradonna,et al.  Experimental and Analytical Studies of a Model Helicopter Rotor in Hover , 1980 .

[10]  S. Osher,et al.  Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes , 1994 .

[11]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[12]  J. Gordon Leishman,et al.  Transient Rotor Inflow Using a Time-Accurate Free-Vortex Wake Model , 2001 .

[13]  S. J. Newman,et al.  Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics – Second edition J.G. Leishmann Cambridge University Press, The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 2RU, UK. 2006. 826pp. Illustrated. £65. ISBN 0-521-85860-7. , 2007, Aeronautical Journal.