Sensitivity-based research prioritization through stochastic characterization modeling

PurposeProduct developers using life cycle toxicity characterization models to understand the potential impacts of chemical emissions face serious challenges related to large data demands and high input data uncertainty. This motivates greater focus on model sensitivity toward input parameter variability to guide research efforts in data refinement and design of experiments for existing and emerging chemicals alike. This study presents a sensitivity-based approach for estimating toxicity characterization factors given high input data uncertainty and using the results to prioritize data collection according to parameter influence on characterization factors (CFs). Proof of concept is illustrated with the UNEP-SETAC scientific consensus model USEtox.MethodsUsing Monte Carlo analysis, we demonstrate a sensitivity-based approach to prioritize data collection with an illustrative example of aquatic ecotoxicity CFs for the vitamin B derivative niacinamide, which is an antioxidant used in personal care products. We calculate CFs via 10,000 iterations assuming plus-or-minus one order of magnitude variability in fate and exposure-relevant data inputs, while uncertainty in effect factor data is modeled as a central t distribution. Spearman’s rank correlation indices are used for all variable inputs to identify parameters with the largest influence on CFs.Results and discussionFor emissions to freshwater, the niacinamide CF is near log-normally distributed with a geometric mean of 0.02 and geometric standard deviation of 8.5 PAF m3 day/kg. Results of Spearman’s rank correlation show that degradation rates in air, water, and soil are the most influential parameters in calculating CFs, thus benefiting the most from future data refinement and experimental research. Kow, sediment degradation rate, and vapor pressure were the least influential parameters on CF results. These results may be very different for other, e.g., more lipophilic chemicals, where Kow is known to drive many fate and exposure aspects in multimedia modeling. Furthermore, non-linearity between input parameters and CF results prevents transferring sensitivity conclusions from one chemical to another.ConclusionsA sensitivity-based approach for data refinement and research prioritization can provide guidance to database managers, life cycle assessment practitioners, and experimentalists to concentrate efforts on the few parameters that are most influential on toxicity characterization model results. Researchers can conserve resources and address parameter uncertainty by applying this approach when developing new or refining existing CFs for the inventory items that contribute most to toxicity impacts.

[1]  David W Pennington,et al.  Extrapolating ecotoxicological measures from small data sets. , 2003, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[2]  Rebecca Klaper,et al.  Daphnia magna mortality when exposed to titanium dioxide and fullerene (C60) nanoparticles , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[3]  D. Dawson,et al.  Evaluation of the frog embryo teratogenesis assay: Xenopus (FETAX) as a model system for mixture toxicity hazard assessment , 1991 .

[4]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Building a model based on scientific consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Y. Cohen,et al.  In silico analysis of nanomaterials hazard and risk. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[6]  F. Moussa,et al.  Toxicity studies of fullerenes and derivatives. , 2007, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[7]  Dick de Zwart,et al.  Exploring REACH as a potential data source for characterizing ecotoxicity in life cycle assessment , 2017, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[8]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Sensitivity analysis to quantify uncertainty in Life Cycle Assessment: The case study of an Italian tile , 2011 .

[9]  Peter Fantke,et al.  From incremental to fundamental substitution in chemical alternatives assessment , 2015 .

[10]  Peter Fantke,et al.  Improving plant bioaccumulation science through consistent reporting of experimental data. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  T. Anderson,et al.  C60 fullerene soil sorption, biodegradation, and plant uptake. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Coupling Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment for Nanomaterials , 2008 .

[13]  Kiril Hristovski,et al.  Biosorption of nanoparticles to heterotrophic wastewater biomass. , 2010, Water research.

[14]  E. Petersen,et al.  Aqueous fullerene aggregates (nC60) generate minimal reactive oxygen species and are of low toxicity in fish: a revision of previous reports. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[15]  G. Andrievsky,et al.  Is the C60 Fullerene Molecule Toxic?! , 2005 .

[16]  Marcel Weil,et al.  Nanotoxicity and Life Cycle Assessment: First attempt towards the determination of characterization factors for carbon nanotubes , 2014 .

[17]  Thomas P. Seager,et al.  Anticipatory life-cycle assessment for responsible research and innovation , 2014 .

[18]  P. Westerhoff,et al.  Simultaneous removal of nanosilver and fullerene in sequencing batch reactors for biological wastewater treatment. , 2015, Chemosphere.

[19]  Thomas P. Seager,et al.  A climate rationale for research and development on photovoltaics manufacture , 2017 .

[20]  T. Chao,et al.  Beyond nC60: strategies for identification of transformation products of fullerene oxidation in aquatic and biological samples , 2012, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[21]  A. Hospido,et al.  PPCPs in wastewater – Update and calculation of characterization factors for their inclusion in LCA studies , 2014 .

[22]  Stig Irving Olsen,et al.  Nanotechnology and Life Cycle Assessment. A systems approach to Nanotechnology and the environment: Synthesis of Results Obtained at a Workshop Washington, DC 2–3 October 2006 , 2007 .

[23]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[24]  Mark A J Huijbregts,et al.  Quantifying the trade-off between parameter and model structure uncertainty in life cycle impact assessment. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Morten Wang Fagerland,et al.  Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances. , 2009, Contemporary clinical trials.

[26]  Margni Manuele,et al.  Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the European context - based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors (International Reference Life Cycle Data System - ILCD handbook) , 2011 .

[27]  Mark A Chappell,et al.  Limitations of toxicity characterization in life cycle assessment: Can adverse outcome pathways provide a new foundation? , 2016, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[28]  I. Linkov,et al.  Risk Assessment, Life Cycle Assessment, and Decision Methods for Nanomaterials , 2015 .

[29]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Uncertainty in msPAF-Based Ecotoxicological Effect Factors for Freshwater Ecosystems in Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2007, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[30]  Elizabeth A. Casman,et al.  Stream dynamics and chemical transformations control the environmental fate of silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles in a watershed-scale model. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  Mark R Wiesner,et al.  Comparative toxicity of C60 aggregates toward mammalian cells: role of tetrahydrofuran (THF) decomposition. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  Kyungho Choi,et al.  Sunlight Enhances Toxicity of Fullerene (C 60 ) to Freshwater Invertebrates Daphnia magna and Moina macrocopa , 2014 .

[33]  S Cucurachi,et al.  Characterisation factors for life cycle impact assessment of sound emissions. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2019, CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering.

[35]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Multimedia fate and human intake modeling: spatial versus nonspatial insights for chemical emissions in Western Europe. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Chia-Ying Chen,et al.  Sorption of Buckminsterfullerene (C60) to saturated soils. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[37]  Eva Oberdörster,et al.  Toxicity of an engineered nanoparticle (fullerene, C60) in two aquatic species, Daphnia and fathead minnow. , 2006, Marine environmental research.

[38]  Ben A. Wender,et al.  Tradeoff Evaluation Improves Comparative Life Cycle Assessment: A Photovoltaic Case Study , 2016 .

[39]  M. Hauschild,et al.  USEtox fate and ecotoxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: sensitivity to key chemical properties , 2011 .

[40]  D. Bissett,et al.  Niacinamide: A B vitamin that improves aging facial skin appearance. , 2006, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[41]  John R. Morris,et al.  Oxidation of c60 aerosols by atmospherically relevant levels of o3. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  Nirupam Aich,et al.  Research strategy to determine when novel nanohybrids pose unique environmental risks , 2015 .

[43]  Matthew MacLeod,et al.  Evaluating and expressing the propagation of uncertainty in chemical fate and bioaccumulation models , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[44]  Anders Baun,et al.  Redefining risk research priorities for nanomaterials , 2009, Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology.

[45]  C. Jafvert,et al.  Buckminsterfullerene's (C60) octanol-water partition coefficient (Kow) and aqueous solubility. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  Nanna B. Hartmann,et al.  Adapting OECD Aquatic Toxicity Tests for Use with Manufactured Nanomaterials: Key Issues and Consensus Recommendations. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[47]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[48]  Ad M J Ragas,et al.  Do interspecies correlation estimations increase the reliability of toxicity estimates for wildlife? , 2012, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[49]  Robert L. Tanguay,et al.  In vivo evaluation of carbon fullerene toxicity using embryonic zebrafish. , 2007, Carbon.

[50]  Thomas P. Seager,et al.  An anticipatory approach to quantify energetics of recycling CdTe photovoltaic systems , 2016 .

[51]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[52]  Yan Li,et al.  Developmental toxicity in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos after exposure to manufactured nanomaterials: Buckminsterfullerene aggregates (nC60) and fullerol , 2007, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[53]  Michael Søgaard Jørgensen,et al.  The USEtox story: a survey of model developer visions and user requirements , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[54]  Thomas D. Gautheir Detecting Trends Using Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient , 2001 .

[55]  W. Thielemans,et al.  Biodegradability of organic nanoparticles in the aqueous environment. , 2011, Chemosphere.

[56]  Vicki Stone,et al.  Research priorities to advance eco-responsible nanotechnology. , 2009, ACS nano.

[57]  Mirko Miseljic,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials: a literature review of assessment status , 2014, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[58]  F. A. Andersen Final report of the safety assessment of niacinamide and niacin. , 2005, International journal of toxicology.

[59]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Estimating half-lives for pesticide dissipation from plants. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[60]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Life cycle human health impacts of 875 pesticides , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[61]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  New perspectives on nanomaterial aquatic ecotoxicity: production impacts exceed direct exposure impacts for carbon nanotoubes. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[62]  Robert Ries,et al.  Characterizing, Propagating, and Analyzing Uncertainty in Life‐Cycle Assessment: A Survey of Quantitative Approaches , 2007 .

[63]  G. Shaddick,et al.  Parameterization models for pesticide exposure via crop consumption. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[64]  Robert L Tanguay,et al.  Fullerene C60 exposure elicits an oxidative stress response in embryonic zebrafish. , 2008, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[65]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Life cycle assessment at nanoscale: review and recommendations , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[66]  Guido Sonnemann,et al.  Uncertainty assessment by a Monte Carlo simulation in a life cycle inventory of electricity produced by a waste incinerator , 2003 .

[67]  Stig Irving Olsen,et al.  Freshwater ecotoxicity characterisation factor for metal oxide nanoparticles: a case study on titanium dioxide nanoparticle. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[68]  M. Lens Use of fullerenes in cosmetics. , 2009, Recent patents on biotechnology.

[69]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Human-Toxicological Effect and Damage Factors of Carcinogenic and Noncarcinogenic Chemicals for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2005, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[70]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[71]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Illustrating anticipatory life cycle assessment for emerging photovoltaic technologies. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[72]  Thomas Seager,et al.  Towards anticipatory life cycle assessment of photovoltaics , 2013, 2013 IEEE 39th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).

[73]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  USES-LCA 2.0—a global nested multi-media fate, exposure, and effects model , 2009 .