Onset of Sliding of Elastomer Multicontacts: Failure of a Model of Independent Asperities to Match Experiments

Modeling of rough frictional interfaces is often based on asperity models, in which the behavior of individual microjunctions is assumed. In the absence of local measurements at the microjunction scale, quantitative comparison of such models with experiments is usually based only on macroscopic quantities, like the total tangential load resisted by the interface. Recently however, a new experimental dataset was presented on the onset of sliding of rough elastomeric interfaces, which includes local measurements of the contact area of the individual microjunctions. Here, we use this more comprehensive dataset to test the possibility of quantitatively matching the measurements with a model of independent asperities, enriched with experimental information about the area of microjunctions and its evolution under shear. We show that, despite using parameter values and behavior laws constrained and inspired by experiments, our model does not quantitatively match the macroscopic measurements. We discuss the possible origins of this failure.

[1]  O. Braun,et al.  Transition from stick-slip to smooth sliding: an earthquakelike model. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[2]  Seismic quiescence in a frictional earthquake model , 2018 .

[3]  J. Scheibert,et al.  Shear-Induced Anisotropy in Rough Elastomer Contact. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[4]  J. Molinari,et al.  The role of the roughness spectral breadth in elastic contact of rough surfaces , 2017, 1704.05650.

[5]  Contact and Deformation of Randomly Rough Surfaces with Varying Root-Mean-Square Gradient , 2017, Tribology Letters.

[6]  J. Scheibert,et al.  Evolution of real contact area under shear and the value of static friction of soft materials , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  G. Carbone,et al.  Interacting and coalescing Hertzian asperities: A new multiasperity contact model , 2012 .

[8]  J. Scheibert,et al.  Shear-induced contact area anisotropy explained by a fracture mechanics model. , 2019, Physical review. E.

[9]  J. Scheibert,et al.  Relaxation Tribometry: A Generic Method to Identify the Nature of Contact Forces , 2019, Tribology Letters.

[10]  N. Pugno,et al.  A 2-D model for friction of complex anisotropic surfaces , 2017, 1706.08055.

[11]  J. Barbera,et al.  Contact mechanics , 1999 .

[12]  L. Afferrante,et al.  Contact of rough surfaces: Modeling adhesion in advanced multiasperity models , 2019, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology.

[13]  Raymond D. Mindlin,et al.  Compliance of elastic bodies in contact , 1949 .

[14]  Luciano Afferrante,et al.  Meeting the Contact-Mechanics Challenge , 2017, Tribology Letters.

[15]  Roger A. Sauer,et al.  Continuum contact models for coupled adhesion and friction , 2018, The Journal of Adhesion.

[16]  Mark O. Robbins,et al.  Contact between rough surfaces and a criterion for macroscopic adhesion , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Contact of nominally flat surfaces , 1966, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[18]  J. Scheibert,et al.  Statistics of the separation between sliding rigid rough surfaces: Simulations and extreme value theory approach. , 2019, Physical review. E.

[19]  Michele Ciavarella,et al.  A “re-vitalized” Greenwood and Williamson model of elastic contact between fractal surfaces , 2006 .

[20]  B. Persson Theory of rubber friction and contact mechanics , 2001 .

[21]  A. Volokitin,et al.  On the nature of surface roughness with application to contact mechanics, sealing, rubber friction and adhesion. , 2005, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[22]  J. Scheibert,et al.  Propagation Length of Self-healing Slip Pulses at the Onset of Sliding: A Toy Model , 2014, Tribology Letters.

[23]  A. Prevost,et al.  Adhesive Contact of Model Randomly Rough Rubber Surfaces , 2019, Tribology Letters.

[24]  M. Peyrard,et al.  Modeling friction on a mesoscale: master equation for the earthquakelike model. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[25]  J. Scheibert,et al.  Slow slip and the transition from fast to slow fronts in the rupture of frictional interfaces , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Michele Ciavarella,et al.  Modeling and simulation in tribology across scales: An overview , 2018, Tribology International.

[27]  A. Gourdin,et al.  Applied Numerical Methods , 2004 .

[28]  J. Scheibert,et al.  History-dependent friction and slow slip from time-dependent microscopic junction laws studied in a statistical framework. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.