Formal Vulnerability Assessment of a maritime transportation system

Abstract World trade increasingly relies on longer, larger and more complex supply chains, where maritime transportation is a vital backbone of such operations. Long and complex supply chain systems are more prone to being vulnerable, though through reviews, no specific methods have been found to assess vulnerabilities of a maritime transportation system. Most existing supply chain risk assessment frameworks require risks to be foreseen to be mitigated, rather than giving transportation systems the ability to cope with unforeseen threats and hazards. In assessing cost-efficiency, societal vulnerability versus industrial cost of measures should be included. This conceptual paper presents a structured Formal Vulnerability Assessment (FVA) methodology, seeking to transfer the safety-oriented Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) framework into the domain of maritime supply chain vulnerability. To do so, the following two alterations are made: (1) The focus of the assessment is defined to ensure the ability of the transportation to serve as a throughput mechanism of goods, and to survive and recover from disruptive events. (2) To cope with low-frequency high-impact disruptive scenarios that were not necessarily foreseen, two parallel tracks of risk assessments need to be pursued—the cause-focused risk assessment as in the FSA, and a consequence-focused failure mode approach.

[1]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Performance metrics in supply chain management , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[2]  Alfonso Morvillo,et al.  Activities, resources and inter-organizational relationships: key factors in port competitiveness , 2008 .

[3]  Richard Oloruntoba,et al.  Assurance of Security in Maritime Supply Chains: Conceptual Issues of Vulnerability and Crisis Management , 2005 .

[4]  Lilach Nachum United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD): World Investment Report 2000: Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions and Development United Nations, New York and Geneva 2000. (Biblio Service) , 2001 .

[5]  Marielle Christiansen,et al.  Supply Chain Optimization for the Liquefied Natural Gas Business , 2009 .

[6]  Khalid Bichou,et al.  A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports , 2005 .

[7]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[8]  Zach G. Zacharia,et al.  DEFINING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2001 .

[9]  Iwan Vanany,et al.  Supply Chain Risk Management: Literature Review and Future Research , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Supply Chain Manag..

[10]  G. Zsidisin,et al.  An institutional theory perspective of business continuity planning for purchasing and supply management , 2005 .

[11]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Supply chain simulation tools and techniques: a survey , 2005, Int. J. Simul. Process. Model..

[12]  Kjetil Fagerholt,et al.  Ship Routing and Scheduling: Status and Perspectives , 2004, Transp. Sci..

[13]  Christopher S. Tang Perspectives in supply chain risk management , 2006 .

[14]  Joseph H. Saleh,et al.  Reliability: How much is it worth? Beyond its estimation or prediction, the (net) present value of reliability , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  H. Broadman,et al.  The social cost of imported oil , 1986 .

[16]  Knut Øien,et al.  A framework for the establishment of organizational risk indicators , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Daniel Roos,et al.  The machine that changed the world : the story of lean production , 1991 .

[18]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Formal safety assessment: A critical review , 2009 .

[19]  Jarl Eirik Korsvik Heuristic solution methods for ship routing and scheduling problems , 2009 .

[20]  F. Caniato,et al.  BUILDING A SECURE AND RESILIENT SUPPLY NETWORK. , 2003 .

[21]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[22]  Ç. Haksöz,et al.  Supply portfolio risk , 2009 .

[23]  K. B. Hendricks,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Supply Chain Disruptions on Long‐Run Stock Price Performance and Equity Risk of the Firm , 2005 .

[24]  D Ronen,et al.  CARGO SHIPS ROUTING AND SCHEDULING: SURVEY OF MODELS AND PROBLEMS. IN: MARITIME TRANSPORT , 1983 .

[25]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  On the ALARP approach to risk management , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[26]  J. Mentzer,et al.  GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN RISK MANAGEMENT , 2008 .

[27]  Thomas J. Goldsby,et al.  Supply chain risks: a review and typology , 2009 .

[28]  F. Caniato,et al.  Building a Secure and Resilient Supply Chain , 2003 .

[29]  A. Chambers,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2008 , 2008 .

[30]  R. B. Cumming,et al.  Is Risk Assessment A Science , 1981 .

[31]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Disasters and transport systems: loss, recovery and competition at the Port of Kobe after the 1995 earthquake , 2000 .

[32]  Valentina Carbone,et al.  The changing role of ports in supply-chain management: an empirical analysis , 2003 .

[33]  Svein Kristiansen,et al.  Maritime Transportation: Safety Management and Risk Analysis , 2004 .

[34]  E. Quah,et al.  Cost Benefit Analysis Ed. 5 , 2007 .

[35]  David Ronen,et al.  Ship scheduling: The last decade , 1993 .

[36]  P. Schönsleben,et al.  System-oriented supply chain risk management , 2009 .

[37]  Uta Jüttner Supply chain risk management: Understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective , 2005 .

[38]  Anthony Saunders,et al.  Understanding Market, Credit, and Operational Risk: The Value at Risk Approach , 2003 .

[39]  M. Christopher,et al.  Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research , 2003 .

[40]  Germaine H. Saad,et al.  Managing Disruption Risks in Supply Chains , 2005 .

[41]  E. Quah,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis , 1972 .

[42]  Yossi Sheffi,et al.  The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage , 2005 .

[43]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Barriers And Accident Prevention , 2004 .

[44]  Christine M. Anderson-Cook,et al.  System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications (2nd ed.) (Book) , 2004 .

[45]  Antony Paulraj,et al.  THE DOMAIN AND SCOPE OF SCM'S FOUNDATIONAL DISCIPLINES — INSIGHTS AND ISSUES TO ADVANCE RESEARCH , 2008 .

[46]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications , 2003 .

[47]  Pedro Antão,et al.  Analysing the risk of LNG carrier operations , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[48]  V M Trbojevic,et al.  Risk based methodology for safety improvements in ports. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[49]  Jennifer Blackhurst,et al.  The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[50]  Bjorn Egil Asbjornslett,et al.  Assess the vulnerability of your production system , 1999 .