Estimating competition coefficients: strong competition among three species of frugivorous flies

Abstract Despite the abundance of studies on competitive interactions, relatively few experiments have been used to fit explicit competition models and estimate competition coefficients. Such estimates are valuable for making contact between theoretical and empirical studies, which tend to measure competition in different units. To quantify the strength of competitive interactions among the larvae of three species of frugivorous flies, I manipulated the densities of each species to investigate all three pairwise interactions. The densities of each species were changed independently (i.e., using a response surface experimental design), which allowed maximum likelihood estimation of the competition coefficients for each species, based on the Hassell and Comins competition model. The effects of competitor density on larval survival, time to emergence, and the weight of emerging adults were also analyzed to investigate the responses of individual species to density. The estimates of the competition coefficients suggest that the larvae of these flies experience strong asymmetric competition for resources, and raise questions as to how these species coexist. For each pair, one of the species was largely unaffected by interspecific competition, but decreased the performance of the other.

[1]  B. Shorrocks,et al.  Interspecific competition is not a major organizing force in many insect communities , 1984, Nature.

[2]  A. Ives Aggregation and Coexistence in a Carrion Fly Community , 1991 .

[3]  S. Juliano,et al.  Effect of leaf litter and density on fitness and population performance of the hole mosquito Aedes triseriatus , 1995 .

[4]  EVOLUTION OF PLANT RESISTANCE TO MULTIPLE HERBIVORES , 1997 .

[5]  M E Gilpin,et al.  Competition between species: theoretical models and experimental tests. , 1973, Theoretical population biology.

[6]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Coexistence of plant species with similar niches , 1984, Vegetatio.

[7]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Field Experiments on Interspecific Competition , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[8]  B. Shorrocks,et al.  Competition on a Divided and Ephemeral Resource: A Simulation Model , 1981 .

[9]  C. Pfister Estimating Competition Coefficients from Census Data: A Test with Field Manipulations of Tidepool Fishes , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[10]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Frequency-dependent selection and competition: empirical approaches. , 1988, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. , 1979 .

[12]  T. Ridsdill‐Smith Asymmetric competition in cattle dung between two species of Onthophagus dung beetle and the bush fly, Musca vetustissima , 1993 .

[13]  Francisco J. Ayala,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Selection , 1974 .

[14]  John Vandermeer,et al.  The Competitive Structure of Communities: An Experimental Approach with Protozoa , 1969 .

[15]  Paul C. Marino,et al.  Competition between mosses (Splachnaceae) in patchy habitats , 1991 .

[16]  P. Giller,et al.  Spatial and temporal co-occurrence of competitors in Southern african dung beetle communities , 1994 .

[17]  R. Seifert,et al.  A Community Matrix Analysis of Heliconia Insect Communities , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Predicting the outcome of competition using experimental data : Maximum likelihood and bayesian approaches , 1996 .

[19]  B. D. Inouye,et al.  Integrating nested spatial scales: implications for the coexistence of competitors on a patchy resource , 1999 .

[20]  M. Hassell,et al.  Discrete time models for two-species competition. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[21]  R. Law,et al.  RESPONSE-SURFACE ANALYSIS OF TWO-SPECIES COMPETITION: AN EXPERIMENT ON PHLEUM ARENARIUM AND VULPIA FASCICULATA , 1987 .

[22]  P. Marino DISPERSAL AND COEXISTENCE OF MOSSES (SPLACHNACEAE) IN PATCHY HABITATS , 1991 .

[23]  Thomas Park,et al.  Interspecies Competition in Populations of Trilobium confusum Duval and Trilobium castaneum Herbst , 1948 .

[24]  L. Slobodkin,et al.  Community Structure, Population Control, and Competition , 1960, The American Naturalist.

[25]  A. Edwards Likelihood (Expanded Edition) , 1972 .

[26]  S. Juliano SPECIES INTRODUCTION AND REPLACEMENT AMONG MOSQUITOES: INTERSPECIFIC RESOURCE COMPETITION OR APPARENT COMPETITION? , 1998 .

[27]  J. Connolly ON DIFFICULTIES WITH REPLACEMENT-SERIES METHODOLOGY IN MIXTURE EXPERIMENTS , 1986 .

[28]  R. Denno,et al.  Competitive Interactions and Ecological Strategies of Sarcophagid and Calliphorid Flies Inhabiting Rabbit Carrion , 1976 .

[29]  G. F. Gause The struggle for existence , 1971 .

[30]  R. Beaver NON-EQUILIBRIUM 'ISLAND' COMMUNITIES: DIPTERA BREEDING IN DEAD SNAILS , 1977 .

[31]  Norman R. Draper,et al.  Applied regression analysis (2. ed.) , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[32]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Patterns and Consequences of Interspecific Competition in Natural Communities: A Review of Field Experiments with Plants , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[33]  R. Cousens Aspects of the Design and Interpretation of Competition (Interference) Experiments , 1991, Weed Technology.

[34]  J. O. Rawlings,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1998 .

[35]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Competition in Field Experiments , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[36]  Brian D. Inouye,et al.  RESPONSE SURFACE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS FOR INVESTIGATING INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION , 2001 .

[37]  D. Grimaldi,et al.  Competition in Natural Populations of Mycophagous Drosophila , 1984 .

[38]  I. Hanski,et al.  CHAPTER 17. Competition in Dung Beetles , 1991 .