Knowledge boundaries in enterprise software platform development: Antecedents and consequences for platform governance

The widespread uptake of platform strategies turns many vendors of enterprise software into curators of an ecosystem of firms that collaboratively develop and commercialize a shared technology. As a platform owner’s effectiveness in integrating knowledge across ecosystem participants will distinguish it from its competitors, we investigate the management of development-related knowledge across firm boundaries. Our exploratory, multiple-case study of four platforms illustrates how “knowledge boundaries” emerge between platform owners and complementors. We observe that knowledge boundaries are influenced by a platform’s functional extent, interface design, and evolutionary dynamics, which create differences, dependencies, and novelty of development knowledge, resulting in qualitatively distinct types of knowledge boundaries. To overcome knowledge boundaries, platform owners provide various resources at the boundary, including information portals, documentation, helpdesks, and alignment workshops. We observe that in shaping these resources, platform owners face a trade-off between providing knowledge at the right scope, while allowing for the scalability of knowledge resources for the entire ecosystem. Depending on their scope and scale, we classify knowledge boundary resources as broadcasting, brokering, and bridging, each representing qualitatively distinct patterns in managing knowledge in platform ecosystems. We conclude with implications for researchers and managers.

[1]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[3]  Beth A. Bechky Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[4]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures , 1998 .

[5]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[6]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[7]  Thomas L. Huber,et al.  Governance Practices in Platform Ecosystems: Navigating Tensions Between Cocreated Value and Governance Costs , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  M. Tushman,et al.  Boundary Spanning Individuals: Their Role in Information Transfer and Their Antecedents , 1981 .

[9]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  Going Beyond the Dominant Paradigm for Information Technology Innovation Research: Emerging Concepts and Methods , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[10]  M. Tushman,et al.  Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts , 2012 .

[11]  Ron Adner,et al.  Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations , 2009 .

[12]  Edward G. Anderson,et al.  Platform Performance Investment in the Presence of Network Externalities , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[14]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[15]  Ralph Katz,et al.  Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[16]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[17]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[19]  Peng Huang,et al.  Co-Creation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software , 2011, MIS Q..

[20]  A. Gawer Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework , 2014 .

[21]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Context is king! Considering particularism in research design and reporting , 2016, J. Inf. Technol..

[22]  Peng Huang,et al.  Appropriability Mechanisms and the Platform Partnership Decision: Evidence from Enterprise Software , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy--and How to Make Them Work for You , 2016 .

[24]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[25]  Josep Lluís Cano Giner,et al.  Technology Ecosystem Governance , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[26]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts , 2013, MIS Q..

[27]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Evolutionary Competition in Platform Ecosystems , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View , 2008 .

[29]  Joel West,et al.  How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies , 2003 .

[30]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[31]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Into the black box: the knowledge transformation cycle , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[32]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  Exploring Value Cocreation in Relationships Between an ERP Vendor and its Partners: A Revelatory Case Study , 2012, MIS Q..

[33]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[34]  Arnaldo Camuffo,et al.  When the mirror gets misted up: Modularity and technological change , 2014 .

[35]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[36]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[37]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[38]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  Information Technology and Product/Service Innovation: A Brief Assessment and Some Suggestions for Future Research , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[39]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[40]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  Making Design Rules: A Multi-Domain Perspective , 2005 .

[41]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Christian Hestermann Magic Quadrant for Single-Instance ERP for Product-Centric Midmarket Companies 09 , 2016 .

[43]  M. Tushman Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[44]  G. Johns The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[45]  M.A. Cusumano,et al.  The elements of platform leadership , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[46]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[47]  M. Armstrong Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[48]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[49]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[50]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Platform Rules: Multi-Sided Platforms as Regulators , 2008 .

[51]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[52]  K. Boudreau,et al.  How to Manage Outside Innovation , 2009 .

[53]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[54]  Birgitta Bergvall-Kåreborn,et al.  Persistent problems and practices in information systems development: a study of mobile applications development and distribution , 2014, Inf. Syst. J..

[55]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple's iOS Service System , 2015, MIS Q..

[56]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[57]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software 'Apps' Developers and Patterns of Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[58]  James Roche,et al.  Adopting DevOps practices in quality assurance , 2013, CACM.