Factors that influence outcomes of the Mitrofanoff and Malone antegrade continence enema reconstructive procedures in children.

[1]  B. Narayanaswamy,et al.  The Yang–Monti ileovesicostomy: a problematic channel? , 2001, BJU international.

[2]  A. Liard,et al.  The Mitrofanoff procedure: 20 years later. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[3]  M. Cain,et al.  Appendicovesicostomy and newer alternatives for the Mitrofanoff procedure: results in the last 100 patients at Riley Children's Hospital. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[4]  R. Gosálbez,et al.  Clinical applications of the Monti procedure as a continent catheterizable stoma. , 1999, Urology.

[5]  J. R. de Carvalho,et al.  New techniques for construction of efferent conduits based on the Mitrofanoff principle. , 1998, Urology.

[6]  A. Retik,et al.  The Mitrofanoff principle in continent urinary reconstruction. , 1997, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[7]  M. S. Tobin,et al.  Continent urinary diversion: the Children's Hospital experience. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[8]  A. Freedman,et al.  Results of the Mitrofanoff procedure in urinary tract reconstruction in children. , 1997, British journal of urology.

[9]  Wen‐Horng Yang,et al.  Yang needle tunneling technique in creating antireflux and continent mechanisms. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[10]  J. Duckett,et al.  Appendicovesicostomy (and variations) in bladder reconstruction. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[11]  P. Malone,et al.  Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema , 1990, The Lancet.

[12]  P. Mitrofanoff.  Cystostomie continente trans-appendiculaire dans le traitement des vessies neurologiques. , 1980 .