Privacy, boundaries and smart homes for health: An ethnographic study

&NA; This article explores how people negotiate borders and boundaries within the home, in the context of health and the introduction of new technologies. We draw on an ethnographic study involving a socially diverse group of people, which included people with experience of telecare or smart home energy systems. Participants engaged in various strategies to regulate the borders of their home, even though new technologies have begun to change the nature of these borders. Participants managed health conditions but also their use of technology through boundary work that permitted devices to be more or less visible and integrated within the home. Findings highlight that if smart healthcare technologies are to be accepted in the home then there is a need for mechanisms that allow people to control the interpretation of data and flow of information generated about them and their households. HighlightsSmart home technology has been heralded as a new way of managing health.Research needs to explore acceptability and implications of smart home technology.This study examined people's use of homes in the context of health and technology.Participants used various strategies to regulate borders in their homes.Smart home technologies should allow personal control of data and information flow.

[1]  Ross J. Anderson,et al.  The collection, linking and use of data in biomedical research and health care: ethical issues , 2015 .

[2]  Allison M. Williams.  Changing geographies of care: employing the concept of therapeutic landscapes as a framework in examining home space. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[3]  Cristiano Storni,et al.  Multiple Forms of Appropriation in Self-Monitoring Technology: Reflections on the Role of Evaluation in Future Self-Care , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  S. Bowlby,et al.  “Doing home”: Patriarchy, caring, and space , 1997 .

[5]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  "Just whack it on until it gets hot": Working with IoT Data in the Home , 2016, CHI.

[6]  M. Mort,et al.  Telecare and older people: who cares where? , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[7]  I. Gudymenko,et al.  Privacy in Ubiquitous Computing , 2011 .

[8]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Personalization revisited: a reflective approach helps people better personalize health services and motivates them to increase physical activity , 2015, UbiComp.

[9]  Jonathan M. Smith.  A Geography of the Lifeworld: Movement, Rest and Encounter , 2017 .

[10]  David Coyle,et al.  Empirically derived user attributes for the design of home healthcare technologies , 2015, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[11]  Tom Rodden,et al.  “This has to be the cats”: Personal Data Legibility in Networked Sensing Systems , 2016, CSCW.

[12]  Y. Tuan,et al.  Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. , 1978 .

[13]  Carole Després,et al.  The meaning of home: Literature review and directions for future research and theoretical development. , 1991 .

[14]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[15]  Thomas P. Moran.  Everyday adaptive design , 2002, DIS '02.

[16]  Elaine M. Huang,et al.  Hacking the Natural Habitat: An In-the-Wild Study of Smart Homes, Their Development, and the People Who Live in Them , 2012, Pervasive.

[17]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design: Cultural probes , 1999, INTR.

[18]  Stinne Aaløkke Ballegaard,et al.  Negotiating boundaries: managing disease at home , 2010, CHI.

[19]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. , 2013, Social science & medicine.

[20]  Austin Henderson,et al.  There's No Place Like Home: Continuing Design in Use , 1992, Design at Work.

[21]  Alan J. Dix,et al.  Designing for appropriation , 2007, BCS HCI.

[22]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[23]  Appropriated landscapes: the intrusion of technology and equipment into the homes and lives of families with a child with complex needs , 2010, Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community.

[24]  P. Kontos,et al.  The personal significance of home: habitus and the experience of receiving long-term home care. , 2005, Sociology of health & illness.

[25]  李子卿.  地方感何以可能——兼评段义孚“Space and Place: The Perspectives of Experience”一书 , 2016 .

[26]  J. Hendy,et al.  Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  Morten Kyng,et al.  On participatory design of home-based healthcare , 2012, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[28]  David Seamon,et al.  Home, Reach, and the Sense of Place , 1980 .

[29]  C. Marcus.  House As a Mirror of Self : Exploring the Deeper Meaning of Home , 1995 .

[30]  Peter Tolmie,et al.  Deploying research technology in the home , 2008, CSCW.

[31]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Concealing or Revealing Mobile Medical Devices?: Designing for Onstage and Offstage Presentation , 2015, CHI.

[32]  Stefan Saroiu,et al.  Home automation in the wild: challenges and opportunities , 2011, CHI.

[33]  A. Buttimer,et al.  The Human Experience of Space and Place , 1980 .

[34]  Stefan Rennick Egglestone,et al.  Motivating mobility: designing for lived motivation in stroke rehabilitation , 2011, CHI.

[35]  J. Burridge,et al.  The reality of homes fit for heroes: design challenges for rehabilitation technology at home , 2009 .

[36]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons , 1990, CHI '90.

[37]  E. Relph.  Place and placelessness , 1976 .

[38]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Privacy in Context - Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life , 2009 .

[39]  Diane Gromala,et al.  Impression management work: how seniors with chronic pain address disruptions in their interactions , 2012, CSCW.

[40]  The role of home in HIV/AIDS: a visual approach to understanding human-environment interactions in the context of long-term illness. , 2008, Health & place.

[41]  G. Marx.  Murky conceptual waters: The public and the private , 2001, Ethics and Information Technology.

[42]  N. Fox.  Boundary Objects, Social Meanings and the Success of New Technologies , 2011 .

[43]  David Benyon,et al.  Investigating ubiquitous computing in the home. , 2001 .

[44]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Healthcare in everyday life: designing healthcare services for daily life , 2008, CHI.

[45]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Investigating Genres and Perspectives in HCI Research on the Home , 2015, CHI.

[46]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[47]  J. Freedman,et al.  Conceptions of Crowding. (Book Reviews: Crowding and Behavior; The Environment and Social Behavior. Privacy, Personal Space. Territory, Crowding) , 1975 .

[48]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[49]  Joseph P. Wherton,et al.  The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: discourse analysis , 2012, BMJ Open.

[50]  Paul Dourish,et al.  The Appropriation of Interactive Technologies: Some Lessons from Placeless Documents , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[51]  Nicolas Hine,et al.  Current Issues and Future Directions in Methods for Studying Technology in the Home , 2013, PsychNology J..

[52]  M. Heidegger.  Poetry, Language, Thought , 1971 .

[53]  N. Gale,et al.  Telehealth as 'peace of mind': embodiment, emotions and the home as the primary health space for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. , 2013, Health & place.

[54]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  Learning from a learning thermostat: lessons for intelligent systems for the home , 2013, UbiComp.

[55]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[56]  Niall Twomey,et al.  Bridging e-Health and the Internet of Things: The SPHERE Project , 2015, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[57]  Tracy Bhamra,et al.  Situating Digital Interventions: Mixed Methods for HCI Research in the Home , 2015, Interact. Comput..

[58]  Jeanne Moore,et al.  PLACING HOME IN CONTEXT , 2000 .

[59]  R. Kitchin,et al.  Big data and human geography , 2013 .

[60]  Judith Sixsmith,et al.  The meaning of home: an exploratory study of environmental experience , 1986 .