Prospective Analysis of Long-term Psychosocial Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: Two-year Postoperative Results From the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study

Objective:To prospectively evaluate the psychosocial outcomes and body image of patients 2 years postmastectomy reconstruction using a multicenter, multisurgeon approach. Background:Although breast reconstruction has been shown to confer significant psychosocial benefits in breast cancer patients at year 1 postreconstruction, we considered the possibility that psychosocial outcomes may remain in a state of flux for years after surgery. Methods:Patients were recruited as part of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study, a 12 center, 23 surgeon prospective cohort study of mastectomy reconstruction patients. Two-sided paired sample t tests were used to compare change scores for the various psychosocial subscales. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine whether the magnitude of the change score varied by procedure type. Results:Preoperative and postoperative year 2 surveys were received from 173 patients; 116 with immediate and 57 with delayed reconstruction. For the immediate reconstruction cohort, significant improvements were observed in all psychosocial subscales except for body image. This occurred essentially independent of procedure type. In the cohort with delayed reconstruction, significant change scores were observed only in body image. Women with transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps had significantly greater gains in body image scores (P = 0.003 and P = 0.034, respectively) when compared with expander/implants. Conclusions:General psychosocial benefits and body image gains continued to manifest at 2 years postmastectomy reconstruction. In addition, procedure type had a surprisingly limited effect on psychosocial well being. With outcomes evolving beyond year 1, these data support the need for additional longitudinal breast reconstruction outcome studies.

[1]  O. Asplund,et al.  Capsular Contracture after Breast Reconstruction with Silicone‐Gel and Saline‐Filled Implants: A 6‐Year Follow‐Up , 1990, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  P. Cederna,et al.  Prospective Analysis of Psychosocial Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: One-Year Postoperative Results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  S. S. Kroll,et al.  A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  D. Cella,et al.  Age‐related differences in the quality of life of breast carcinoma patients after treatment , 1999, Cancer.

[5]  C Nos,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of Late Cosmetic Results following Breast Reconstruction: I. Implant Reconstruction , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  Y. Brandberg,et al.  A Prospective and Randomized Study, “SVEA,” Comparing Effects of Three Methods for Delayed Breast Reconstruction on Quality of Life, Patient‐Defined Problem Areas of Life, and Cosmetic Result , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  R. Blamey,et al.  The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction. , 2000, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[8]  Y. Har-Shai,et al.  Aesthetic Results and Patient Satisfaction with Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Tissue Expansion: A Follow‐Up Study , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  A Comparison of Factors Affecting Aesthetic Outcomes of TRAM Flap Breast Reconstructions , 1995, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of Immediate Reconstruction After Mastectomy , 1993, Annals of surgery.

[11]  S. Grundfest-Broniatowski,et al.  Partial mastectomy and breast reconstruction. A comparison of their effects on psychosocial adjustment, body image, and sexuality , 1995, Cancer.

[12]  R. Baker The management of breast cancer with immediate or delayed reconstruction. , 1992, Advances in surgery.

[13]  J. Lowery,et al.  Complications in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Two‐Year Results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  J. Lowery,et al.  Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  L Fallowfield,et al.  Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. , 2000, European journal of cancer.

[16]  S. Schnitt,et al.  Skin‐Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction: Oncologic Risks and Aesthetic Results in Patients with Early‐Stage Breast Cancer , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  Constance M. Chen,et al.  Measuring Quality of Life in Cosmetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes Instruments , 2007, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  J. Lowery,et al.  Determinants of Patient Satisfaction in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[19]  S. Cawthorn,et al.  The Psychological Effect of Mastectomy with or without Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective, Multicenter Study , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  J. Kollias,et al.  Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies , 2005, ANZ journal of surgery.

[21]  J. W. Little,et al.  Psychosocial Correlates of Immediate versus Delayed Reconstruction of the Breast , 1985, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[22]  C. Horton,et al.  An Early Appraisal of the Methods of Tissue Expansion and the Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap in Reconstruction of the Breast Following Mastectomy , 1987, Annals of plastic surgery.

[23]  R. Fielding,et al.  The impact of mastectomy, breast‐conserving treatment and immediate breast reconstructions on the quality of life of Chinese women , 2001, ANZ journal of surgery.

[24]  S. Ariyan,et al.  Treatment Considerations in Postmastectomy Reconstruction: Their Relative Importance and Relationship to Patient Satisfaction , 1994, Annals of plastic surgery.

[25]  K. Clough,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of Late Cosmetic Results following Breast Reconstruction: II. TRAM Flap Reconstruction , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[26]  D. Hidalgo Aesthetic Refinement in Breast Reconstruction: Complete Skin‐Sparing Mastectomy with Autogenous Tissue Transfer , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[27]  J. Lowery,et al.  Quality of Life and Affective Distress in Women Seeking Immediate versus Delayed Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy for Breast Cancer , 2005, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[28]  Y. Brandberg,et al.  Quality of Life, Patients’ Satisfaction, and Aesthetic Outcome after Pedicled or Free TRAM Flap Breast Surgery , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[29]  J. Lowery,et al.  Persistent Pain Following Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Long-Term Effects of Type and Timing of Surgery , 2007, Annals of plastic surgery.