The Agony of Ambivalence and Ways to Resolve It: Introducing the MAID Model:

People are generally averse toward conflict between beliefs and/or feelings underlying their attitudes-that is, attitudinal ambivalence. This review integrates literature on attitudinal ambivalence with theories on decision making and coping strategies to gain a better understanding of when and how people deal with feelings of ambivalence. First it shows that ambivalence is experienced as being particularly unpleasant when the ambivalent attitude holder is confronted with the necessity to make a choice concerning the ambivalent attitude object; then, incongruent evaluative components of the attitude become accessible, and feelings of uncertainty about the potential outcomes arise, which may involve the anticipation of aversive emotions. Several coping strategies are employed when ambivalence is experienced as unpleasant. Emotion- and problem-focused coping strategies are discussed. The article concludes with a discussion of the MAID (model of ambivalence-induced discomfort), which aims to describe the consequences of ambivalence.

[1]  M. Zanna,et al.  Repression-sensitization differences in responses to a decision , 1982 .

[2]  M. Zanna,et al.  Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. , 1995 .

[3]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  E. Aronson,et al.  When exemplification fails: hypocrisy and the motive for self-integrity. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  J. Bailey,et al.  When Racial Ambivalence Evokes Negative Affect, Using a Disguised Measure of Mood , 1992 .

[6]  Dominique Oberlé,et al.  Denial of responsibility: a new mode of dissonance reduction. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  K. Throsby "How could you let yourself get like that?" Stories of the origins of obesity in accounts of weight loss surgery. , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[8]  Joshua Aronson,et al.  From Dissonance To Disidentification: Selectivity in the Self-Affirmation Process , 1995 .

[9]  A. Brownstein,et al.  Biased predecision processing. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  T. Gilovich,et al.  The experience of regret: what, when, and why. , 1995, Psychological review.

[11]  Y. Trope,et al.  The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Discrepancies between explicit and implicit self-concepts: Consequences for information processing. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Gita Venkataramani Johar,et al.  Attitudinal Ambivalence and Openness to Persuasion: A Framework for Interpersonal Influence , 2007 .

[15]  Irwin Katz,et al.  Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. , 1988 .

[16]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[17]  P. Tetlock Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. , 1983 .

[18]  M. Diehl,et al.  Effects of Attitudinal Ambivalence on Information Processing and Attitude-Intention Consistency☆ , 1997 .

[19]  L. Festinger Conflict, Decision, and Dissonance , 1964 .

[20]  N. Roese,et al.  The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking , 2008, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[21]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  Feature matching, unique features, and the dynamics of the choice process: Predecision conflict and postdecision satisfaction , 1991 .

[22]  G. Maio,et al.  Theories of attitude: creating a witches' brew , 2004 .

[23]  M. Zanna,et al.  Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: when and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable? , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Choice Processing in Emotionally Difficult Decisions , 1997 .

[25]  Leandre R. Fabrigar,et al.  Attitudinal Ambivalence and Message-Based Persuasion: Motivated Processing of Proattitudinal Information and Avoidance of Counterattitudinal Information , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[26]  Joseph R. Ferrari,et al.  Examining Behavioral Processes in Indecision: Decisional Procrastination and Decision-Making Style , 2000 .

[27]  M. Hänze,et al.  Ambivalence, conflict, and decision making: attitudes and feelings in Germany towards NATO's military intervention in the Kosovo war , 2001 .

[28]  A. Elliot,et al.  Prejudice with and without compunction , 1991 .

[29]  M. Zanna,et al.  Mistreatment of an esteemed other as a consequence affecting dissonance reduction , 1974 .

[30]  H. Gerard,et al.  The Dynamics of Opinion Formation , 1987 .

[31]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  On the Primacy of Affect in the Determination of Attitudes and Behavior: The Moderating Role of Affective-Cognitive Ambivalence , 1998 .

[32]  Patricia G. Devine,et al.  The Role of Discrepancy-Associated Affect in Prejudice Reduction , 1993 .

[33]  R. Vonk,et al.  Processing Attitude Statements From In-Group and Out-Group Members: Effects of Within-Group and Within-Person Inconsistencies on Reading Times , 1995 .

[34]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  The Meta–Cognitive Model (MCM) of Attitudes: Implications for Attitude Measurement, Change, and Strength , 2007 .

[35]  Joel Cooper,et al.  Motivational basis of dissonance: the singular role of behavioral consequences. , 1989 .

[36]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[37]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accounting for the effects of accountability. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  John L. Sullivan,et al.  On the Relationship Between Attitude Involvement and Attitude Accessibility: Toward a Cognitive-Motivational Model of Political Information Processing , 2000 .

[39]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Choosing to Avoid: Coping with Negatively Emotion-Laden Consumer Decisions , 1998 .

[40]  E. Higgins,et al.  Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. , 1987, Psychological review.

[41]  Eugene Borgida,et al.  Personal involvement: An examination of processing differences. , 1986 .

[42]  Joop van der Pligt,et al.  Attitudes as stable and transparent constructions , 2004 .

[43]  R. A. Wicklund,et al.  Perspectives on cognitive dissonance , 1976 .

[44]  Suzanne M. Miller Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. , 1987 .

[45]  J. Cooper,et al.  A New Look at Dissonance Theory , 1984 .

[46]  J. Pligt,et al.  Ambivalence, discomfort, and motivated information processing , 2006 .

[47]  Thane S. Pittman,et al.  The consequences of doing nothing: Inaction inertia as avoidance of anticipated counterfactual regret. , 1998 .

[48]  R. Giner-Sorolla,et al.  Guilty pleasures and grim necessities: affective attitudes in dilemmas of self-control. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  Jens Förster,et al.  How Global Versus Local Perception Fits Regulatory Focus , 2005, Psychological science.

[50]  B. Schwartz Self-determination. The tyranny of freedom. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[51]  Donal E. Carlston,et al.  Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. , 1989 .

[52]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Preference for Consistency: The Development of a Valid Measure and the Discovery of Surprising Behavioral Implications , 1995 .

[53]  C. Anderson The Psychology of Doing Nothing: Forms of Decision Avoidance Result from Reason and Emotion , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[54]  M. R. Leippe,et al.  Generalization of dissonance reduction: Decreasing prejudice through induced compliance. , 1994 .

[55]  S. Costarelli,et al.  Ingroup ambivalence and experienced affect: the moderating role of social identification , 2003 .

[56]  S. Chaiken Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[57]  D. Roskos-Ewoldsen,et al.  Negative political advertising and choice conflict , 1999 .

[58]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[59]  Bell,et al.  Ambivalence and Persuasion: The Processing of Messages about Immigrant Groups , 1996, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[60]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  D. Katz THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ATTITUDES , 1960 .

[62]  P. Devine,et al.  Self-directed versus other-directed affect as a consequence of prejudice-related discrepancies. , 1993 .

[63]  F. Sirois Procrastination and counterfactual thinking: avoiding what might have been. , 2004, The British journal of social psychology.

[64]  Philip Broemer Relative effectiveness of differently framed health messages: the influence of ambivalence , 2002 .

[65]  R. Petty,et al.  The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[66]  Linda Simon,et al.  Trivialization: the forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. , 1995 .

[67]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Attitude centrality, organization, and measurement. , 1982 .

[68]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[69]  J. C. Schwarz,et al.  Affect and Delay of Gratification. , 1977 .

[70]  Daniël H. J. Wigboldus,et al.  Positive and negative associations underlying ambivalent attitudes , 2007 .

[71]  J. van der Pligt,et al.  Evaluating Eve: visceral states influence the evaluation of impulsive behavior. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[72]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[73]  Motivational Basis of Dissonance: Aversive Consequences or Inconsistency , 1995 .

[74]  C. Armitage,et al.  Felt and Potential Ambivalence across the Stages of Change , 2007, Journal of health psychology.

[75]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. , 1994 .

[76]  Gregory R. Maio,et al.  Effects of Intergroup Ambivalence on Information Processing: The Role of Physiological Arousal , 2001 .

[77]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  Memory for schema-relevant information: a meta-analytic resolution. , 1992, The British journal of social psychology.

[78]  R. Petty,et al.  Extending the bases of subjective attitudinal ambivalence: interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[79]  Gregory R. Maio,et al.  The Role of Attitudinal Ambivalence in Susceptibility to Consensus Information , 2001 .

[80]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The impact of attitudes on memory: an affair to remember. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[81]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN Harmon-Jones, Harmon-Jones / COGNITIVE DISSONANCE MODEL Testing the Action-Based Model of Cognitive Dissonance: The Effect of Action Orientation on Postdecisional Attitudes , 2002 .

[82]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Postdecisional preference for decision-relevant information as a function of the competence of its source and the degree of familiarity with this information. , 1981 .

[83]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[84]  J. van der Pligt,et al.  Ambivalence and information integration in attitudinal judgment. , 2004, British Journal of Social Psychology.

[85]  Harold B. Gerard,et al.  Choice difficulty, dissonance, and the decision sequence1 , 1967 .

[86]  I. Simonson,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF ANTICIPATING REGRET AND RESPONSIBILITY ON PURCHASE DECISIONS , 1992 .

[87]  S. Worchel,et al.  Role of undesired consequences in arousing cognitive dissonance. , 1970 .

[88]  R. Petty,et al.  Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: an exploration of the PAST model. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[89]  M. Conner,et al.  Ambivalence and Attitudes , 2002 .

[90]  K. Kaplan On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. , 1972 .

[91]  E. Wertheim,et al.  Depression, guilt, and self-management of pleasant and unpleasant events. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[92]  G. Maio,et al.  Examining conflict between components of attitudes: ambivalence and inconsistency are distinct constructs , 2000 .

[93]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Effects of Intra-individual Goal Conflict on Performance , 1994 .

[94]  J. Wackenhut,et al.  Racial ambivalence, value duality, and behavior. , 1986 .

[95]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. , 1998 .

[96]  L. M. Brown,et al.  Intergroup Anxiety: A Person × Situation Approach , 1996 .

[97]  R. Sugden,et al.  Regret Theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty Review of Economic Studies , 1982 .

[98]  M. Zanna,et al.  "Remembering" dissonance: Simultaneous accessibility of inconsistent cognitive elements moderates epistemic discomfort. , 1999 .

[99]  M. J. Monteith,et al.  Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts. , 1993 .

[100]  Mark Conner,et al.  Attitudinal Ambivalence: A Test of Three Key Hypotheses , 2000 .

[101]  M. Lepper,et al.  When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? , 2000 .

[102]  S. Sherman,et al.  Attitude bolstering when behavior is inconsistent with central attitudes , 1980 .

[103]  T. Gilovich,et al.  The temporal pattern to the experience of regret. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[104]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[105]  F. Heider Attitudes and cognitive organization. , 1946, The Journal of psychology.

[106]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Regular ArticleProtected Values , 1997 .

[107]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  Neural components of social evaluation. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[108]  Zeelenberg,et al.  Reconsidering the Relation between Regret and Responsibility. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[109]  Linda Simon,et al.  Evidence That the Production of Aversive Consequences Is Not Necessary to Create Cognitive Dissonance , 1996 .

[110]  J. N. Bassili Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. , 1996 .

[111]  Thane S. Pittman,et al.  Inaction Inertia: Foregoing Future Benefits as a Result of an Initial Failure to Act , 1995 .

[112]  Irwin Katz,et al.  Stigma: A Social Psychological Analysis , 1981 .

[113]  K. Lewin Environmental forces in child behavior and development. , 1931 .

[114]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Construal levels and self-control. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[115]  I. Janis,et al.  Effects of anticipation of forthcoming information on predecisional processes. , 1969 .

[116]  A. Baumgardner,et al.  To know oneself is to like oneself: self-certainty and self-affect. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[117]  R. Hogarth Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics. , 1981 .

[118]  K. Lewin Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[119]  P. Tetlock Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. , 1985 .

[120]  Piers Steel The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[121]  V. Esses,et al.  Ambivalence and Response Amplification: A Motivational Perspective , 2002 .

[122]  B. Schwartz,et al.  Maximizing Versus Satisficing : Happiness Is a Matter of Choice , 2002 .

[123]  H. Gerard,et al.  Compliance, Justification, and Cognitive Change1 , 1974 .