A multi-fidelity shape optimization via surrogate modeling for civil structures

Abstract Shape optimization serves as a powerful tool to reduce wind effects on buildings. Past studies have demonstrated the superiority of the shape tailoring technique in aerodynamic mitigation through recessing or chamfering building corners, etc. Nonetheless, conventional approaches highly rely on wind tunnel experiments for which only a limited number of candidate geometries are tested to identify the best-performing one. In an attempt to globally and automatically explore the optimal geometry, the shape optimization via surrogate modeling is introduced in this study. Particularly, CFD is employed for calibration of the surrogate model. The CFD analyses can be conducted either through low-fidelity simulations such as RANS model, or through high-fidelity ones including LES. The low-fidelity model can provide a large ensemble for surrogate calibration, yet it suffers from the lack of accuracy. On the other hand, the high-fidelity model exhibits satisfactory accuracy, while it can only accommodate a small ensemble which may result in a large sampling error in the surrogate calibration. In order to take advantages of the merits of two types of CFD models, a multi-fidelity surrogate modeling is investigated in this research to guarantee the model accuracy as well as to maintain the computational efficiency.

[1]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling - A Practical Guide , 2008 .

[2]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[3]  Alexander I. J. Forrester,et al.  Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  C. Meneveau,et al.  A Lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  P Perdikaris,et al.  Multi-fidelity modelling via recursive co-kriging and Gaussian–Markov random fields , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  Kyle Brian Collins,et al.  A multi-fidelity framework for physics based rotor blade simulation and optimization , 2008 .

[7]  Evgeny Burnaev,et al.  Minimax Approach to Variable Fidelity Data Interpolation , 2017, AISTATS.

[8]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  A Knowledge-Based Approach To Response Surface Modelling in Multifidelity Optimization , 2003, J. Glob. Optim..

[9]  Yukio Tamura,et al.  Experimental investigation of aerodynamic forces and wind pressures acting on tall buildings with various unconventional configurations , 2012 .

[10]  G. Matheron Principles of geostatistics , 1963 .

[11]  W. Rodi Comparison of LES and RANS calculations of the flow around bluff bodies , 1997 .

[12]  Joel H. Ferziger,et al.  Computational methods for fluid dynamics , 1996 .

[13]  R. A. Miller,et al.  Sequential kriging optimization using multiple-fidelity evaluations , 2006 .

[14]  Aleksandar Jemcov,et al.  A structured mesh boundary motion approach for simulating wind effects on bluff bodies with changing boundaries , 2014 .

[15]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Aerodynamic shape optimization of civil structures: A CFD-enabled Kriging-based approach , 2015 .

[16]  P. Moin,et al.  NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE FLOW AROUND A CIRCULAR CYLINDER AT HIGH REYNOLDS NUMBER , 2003 .

[17]  Bert Blocken,et al.  50 years of Computational Wind Engineering: Past, present and future , 2014 .

[18]  Michael A. Leschziner,et al.  Statistical Turbulence Modelling For Fluid Dynamics - Demystified: An Introductory Text For Graduate Engineering Students , 2015 .