Functional Load and the Lexicon: Evidence that Syntactic Category and Frequency Relationships in Minimal Lemma Pairs Predict the Loss of Phoneme contrasts in Language Change
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[2] Scott A. Jackson,et al. High functional load inhibits phonological contrast loss: A corpus study , 2013, Cognition.
[3] Victor S. Ferreira,et al. Seeking predictions from a predictive framework , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[4] A. Wedel. Lexical contrast maintenance and the organization of sublexical contrast systems , 2012, Language and Cognition.
[5] D. Robert Ladd,et al. What is duality of patterning, anyway? , 2012, Language and Cognition.
[6] Margaret Maclagan,et al. /r/-sandhi in early 20th century New Zealand English , 2012 .
[7] Elsi Kaiser,et al. Exploring the Lexical and Acoustic Consequences of Referential Predictability , 2011, DAARC.
[8] Cédric Gendrot,et al. Anti-Markedness Patterns in French Epenthesis: An Information-theoretic Approach , 2011 .
[9] T Florian Jaeger,et al. On language 'utility': processing complexity and communicative efficiency. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.
[10] Mirjam Ernestus,et al. Gradience and categoricality in phonological theory , 2011 .
[11] Irit Meir,et al. The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language , 2011, Natural language & linguistic theory.
[12] Abby Kaplan,et al. How much homophony is normal?1 , 2011, Journal of Linguistics.
[13] Daniel Currie Hall,et al. Phonological contrast and its phonetic enhancement: dispersedness without dispersion* , 2011, Phonology.
[14] Keren Rice,et al. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology , 2011 .
[15] Melissa Baese-Berk,et al. Phonological Neighborhood Effects in Spoken Word Production: An fMRI Study , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[16] Steven T Piantadosi,et al. Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[17] M. Ernestus. Categoricality and gradience in phonology theory , 2011 .
[18] T. Florian Jaeger,et al. Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.
[19] Sarah Ouwayda. Contrast Preservation in dialects of North Levantine Arabic , 2010 .
[20] Hinrich Schütze,et al. Multilevel Exemplar Theory , 2010, Cogn. Sci..
[21] Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al. Lexical and contextual predictability: Confluent effects on the production of vowels , 2010 .
[22] Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al. Modeling listeners: Comments on Pluymaekers et al. and Scarborough , 2010 .
[23] Ludger Hoffmann. Grundzüge der Phonologie , 2010 .
[24] P. Mok,et al. Perception of the merging tones in Hong Kong Cantonese : preliminary data on monosyllables , 2010 .
[25] W. Bruce Croft,et al. Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper , 2009 .
[26] D. Silverman. Neutralization and anti-homophony in Korean1 , 2009, Journal of Linguistics.
[27] A. Samuel,et al. Perceptual learning for speech , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[28] Adam Albright,et al. Feature-based generalisation as a source of gradient acceptability* , 2009, Phonology.
[29] Joseph Hilbe,et al. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2009 .
[30] Matthew Goldrick,et al. Mechanisms of interaction in speech production , 2009, Language and cognitive processes.
[31] Noah H. Silbert,et al. Generalization Across Segments in Second Language Consonant Identification , 2009 .
[32] Juliette Blevins,et al. An evolutionary approach to lexical competition , 2009 .
[33] Jean-Francois Mondon,et al. The Nature of Homophony and Its Effects on Diachrony and Synchrony. , 2009 .
[34] Juliette Blevins. Structure-preserving sound change : A look at unstressed vowel syncope in Austronesian , 2009 .
[35] Jaye Padgett,et al. Systemic contrast and Catalan rhotics , 2009 .
[36] T. Jaeger,et al. Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.
[37] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Language as shaped by the brain. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[38] Murat Saraclar,et al. Turkish Language Resources: Morphological Parser, Morphological Disambiguator and Web Corpus , 2008, GoTAL.
[39] Jeff Mielke,et al. The Emergence of Distinctive Features , 2008 .
[40] R. Mester,et al. The Phonology of Voicing in Japanese: Theoretical Consequences for Morphological Accessibility , 2008 .
[41] Monica Tamariz,et al. Exploring systematicity between phonological and context-cooccurrence representations of the mental lexicon , 2008 .
[42] Uriel Cohen Priva. Using Information Content to PredictPhone Deletion , 2008 .
[43] William D. Raymond,et al. Probabilistic Relations between Words: Evidence from Reduction in Lexical Production , 2008 .
[44] Bridget Samuels,et al. On Evolutionary Phonology , 2007, Biolinguistics.
[45] Máire Ní Chiosáin,et al. Contrast, Comparison Sets, and the Perceptual Space , 2007 .
[46] Judit Rebeka Campos-Astorkiza. Minimal contrast and the phonology-phonetics interaction , 2007 .
[47] Russell S. Kirby,et al. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. A Multimedia Reference Tool , 2007 .
[48] A. Wedel. Feedback and regularity in the lexicon* , 2007, Phonology.
[49] Ioana Chitoran,et al. From hiatus to diphthong: the evolution of vowel sequences in Romance* , 2007, Phonology.
[50] WPP, No. 105: The Interaction between Spontaneous Imitation and Linguistic Knowledge , 2007 .
[51] Margaret Maclagan,et al. Getting fed up with our feet: Contrast maintenance and the New Zealand English “short” front vowel shift , 2007, Language Variation and Change.
[52] Roger Levy,et al. Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction , 2006, NIPS.
[53] P. Niyogi,et al. Quantifying the functional load of phonemic oppositions, distinctive features, and suprasegmentals , 2006 .
[54] A. Wedel. Exemplar models, evolution and language change , 2006 .
[55] B. Phillips. Word Frequency and Lexical Diffusion , 2006 .
[56] A. Samuel,et al. Generalization in perceptual learning for speech , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[57] Jennifer S. Pardo,et al. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[58] William D. Raymond,et al. Word-internal /t,d/ deletion in spontaneous speech: Modeling the effects of extra-linguistic, lexical, and phonological factors , 2006, Language Variation and Change.
[59] Sang Joon Kim,et al. A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .
[60] Zsuzsanna Fagyal,et al. French: A Linguistic Introduction , 2006 .
[61] Larry K. Ichimura,et al. Anti-Homophony Blocking and its Productivity in Transparadigmatic Relations , 2006 .
[62] S. Kirby,et al. Cultural selection for learnability: Three principles underlying the view that language adapts to be learnable , 2006 .
[63] B. Munson. Lexical Access , Lexical Representation , and Vowel Production , 2006 .
[64] James L. McClelland,et al. Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition , 2005 .
[65] W. Labov,et al. The Atlas Of North American English , 2005 .
[66] A. Samuel,et al. Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.
[67] Simon Kirby,et al. Cultural Selection for Learnability: Three hypotheses underlying the view that language adapts to be learnable. , 2005 .
[68] J. McQueen,et al. The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.
[69] D. Pisoni,et al. Some observations on representations and representational specificity in speech perception and spoken word recognition , 2005 .
[70] R. H. Baayen,et al. Storage and computation in the mental lexicon , 2005 .
[71] M. Kenstowicz. Paradigmatic Uniformity and Contrast , 2004 .
[72] B. Munson,et al. The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[73] P. Smolensky,et al. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .
[74] Grover Hudson,et al. PHONOLOGY AND LANGUAGE USE , 2004 .
[75] Juliette Blevins,et al. The Mystery of Austronesian Final Consonant Loss , 2004 .
[76] Alice Turk,et al. The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis: A Functional Explanation for Relationships between Redundancy, Prosodic Prominence, and Duration in Spontaneous Speech , 2004, Language and speech.
[77] R. Wright. Phonetic Interpretation Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI: Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation , 2004 .
[78] Junko Ito,et al. Morphological contrast and merger: ranuki in Japanese , 2004 .
[79] Partha Niyogi,et al. Measuring the Functional Load of Phonological Contrasts , 2003, ArXiv.
[80] Andrew B Wedel,et al. Self-organization and categorical behavior in phonology , 2003 .
[81] J. Pierrehumbert. Phonetic Diversity, Statistical Learning, and Acquisition of Phonology , 2003, Language and speech.
[82] Jaye Padgett,et al. Contrast and Post-Velar Fronting in Russian , 2003 .
[83] Leonie Cornips,et al. An acoustic study of standard Dutch /v/, /f/, /s/, and /z/ , 2003 .
[84] Louis C. W. Pols,et al. How efficient is speech , 2003 .
[85] Joan L. Bybee,et al. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change , 2002, Language Variation and Change.
[86] Edward Flemming,et al. Auditory Representations in Phonology , 2002 .
[87] R. Wright. A History of the Spanish Language (2nd edition) , 2002 .
[88] Bart de Boer,et al. Evolving Sound Systems , 2002 .
[89] Angelo Cangelosi,et al. Simulating the Evolution of Language , 2002, Springer London.
[90] Kazutaka Kurisu,et al. The Phonology of Morpheme Realization , 2002 .
[91] Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al. Word-specific phonetics , 2001 .
[92] Boris New,et al. Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE , 2001 .
[93] Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .
[94] Simon Kirby,et al. Function, Selection, and Innateness: The Emergence of Language Universals , 1999 .
[95] Ho-min Sohn. The Korean language , 1999 .
[96] Richard Wiese,et al. The Phonology of German , 1996 .
[97] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Language as a dynamical system , 1996 .
[98] J. Elman,et al. Learning and morphological change , 1995, Cognition.
[99] J. Hillenbrand,et al. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[100] W. Labov. Principles Of Linguistic Change , 1994 .
[101] Michael Kenstowicz,et al. Phonology In Generative Grammar , 1994 .
[102] Junko Ito,et al. Feature Predictability and Underspecification: Palatal Prosody in Japanese Mimetics , 1989 .
[103] David Sankoff,et al. Statistical evidence for rule ordering , 1989, Language Variation and Change.
[104] John J. Ohala,et al. Sound change is drawn from a pool of synchronic variation , 1989 .
[105] John C. Wells,et al. Accents of English , 1982 .
[106] William S-Y. Wang. Competing Changes as a Cause of Residue , 1969 .
[107] Noam Chomsky,et al. The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .
[108] C. F. Hockett. The Quantification of Functional Load , 1967 .
[109] Noam Chomsky,et al. वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .
[110] R. N. Indah. Language and Speech , 1958, Nature.
[111] André Martinet,et al. Function, Structure, and Sound Change , 1952 .
[112] J. Gilliéron. Généalogie des mots qui désignent l'abeille : d'après l'Atlas linguistique de la France / par J. Gilliéron,... , 1918 .
[113] Baudouin de Courtenay,et al. Versuch einer Theorie phonetischer Alternationen : ein Capitel aus der Psychophonetik , 1895 .
[114] S. Goldinger. THE ROLE OF PERCEPTUAL EPISODES IN LEXICAL PROCESSING , 2022 .