Cloud-radiation feedbacks in a general circulation model and their dependence on cloud modelling assumptions

The general circulation model (GCM) used in this study includes a prognostic cloud scheme and a rather detailed radiation scheme. In a preceding paper, we showed that this model was more sensitive to a global perturbation of the sea surface temperatures than most other models with similar physical parametrization. The experiments presented here show how this feature might depend on some of the cloud modelling assumptions. We have changed the temperature at which the water clouds are allowed to become ice clouds and analyzed separately the feedbacks associated with the variations of cloud cover and cloud radiative properties. We show that the feedback effect associated with cloud radiative properties is positive in one case and negative in the other. This can be explained by the elementary cloud radiative forcing and has implications concerning the use of the GCMs for climate sensitivity studies.

[1]  E. Roeckner,et al.  Cloud optical depth feedbacks and climate modelling , 1987, Nature.

[2]  Hilding Sundqvist,et al.  Prediction of stratiform clouds: Results from a 5-day forecast with a global model , 1981 .

[3]  Gerald L. Potter,et al.  A methodology for understanding and intercomparing atmospheric climate feedback processes in general circulation models , 1988 .

[4]  J. Mitchell,et al.  C02 and climate: a missing feedback? , 1989, Nature.

[5]  Zhaoxin Li,et al.  Sensitivity of an atmospheric general circulation model to prescribed SST changes: feedback effects associated with the simulation of cloud optical properties , 1991 .

[6]  Stephen K. Cox,et al.  Cirrus Clouds. Part I: A Cirrus Cloud Model , 1985 .

[7]  Cara Wilson,et al.  A doubled CO2 climate sensitivity experiment with a global climate model including a simple ocean , 1987 .

[8]  R. Smith.  A scheme for predicting layer clouds and their water content in a general circulation model , 1990 .

[9]  H. Treut,et al.  Comparison of GCM results with data from operational meteorological satellites , 1989 .

[10]  H. Treut,et al.  Comparison of radiance fields observed by satellite and simulated by the LMD general circulation model , 1991 .

[11]  Michael E. Schlesinger,et al.  Climate Model Simulations of the Equilibrium Climatic Response to Increased Carbon Dioxide (Paper 6R0726) , 1987 .

[12]  Paul W. Stackhouse,et al.  The Relevance of the Microphysical and Radiative Properties of Cirrus Clouds to Climate and Climatic Feedback , 1990 .

[13]  B. Barkstrom,et al.  Cloud-Radiative Forcing and Climate: Results from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment , 1989, Science.

[14]  C. Platt.  The role of cloud microphysics in high-cloud feedback effects on climate change , 1989, Nature.

[15]  H. Treut,et al.  Using meteosat data to validate a prognostic cloud generation scheme , 1988 .

[16]  Lorraine A. Remer,et al.  Cloud optical thickness feedbacks in the CO2 climate problem , 1984 .

[17]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models , 1990 .

[18]  R. Somerville,et al.  Cloud-radiation interactions - Effects of cirrus optical thickness feedbacks , 1986 .

[19]  S. Manabe,et al.  Cloud Feedback Processes in a General Circulation Model , 1988 .