Four Principles of Memory Improvement : A Guide to Improving Learning Efficiency

Recent advances in memory research suggest methods that can be applied to enhance educational practices. We outline four principles of memory improvement that have emerged from research: 1) process material actively, 2) practice retrieval, 3) use distributed practice, and 4) use metamemory. Our discussion of each principle describes current experimental research underlying the principle and explains how people can take advantage of the principle to improve their learning. The techniques that we suggest are designed to increase efficiency—that is, to allow a person to learn more, in the same unit of study time, than someone using less efficient memory strategies. A common thread uniting all four principles is that people learn best when they are active participants in their own learning.

[1]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  Learners’ choices and beliefs about self-testing , 2009, Memory.

[2]  L. Son Metacognitive control and the spacing effect. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  R. Bjork,et al.  Learning Concepts and Categories , 2008, Psychological science.

[5]  Arthur I. Gates,et al.  Recitation As a Factor in Memorizing , 1917 .

[6]  Doug Rohrer,et al.  The effects of interleaved practice , 2010 .

[7]  R. R. Hunt,et al.  The Concept of Distinctiveness in Memory Research , 2012 .

[8]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall , 1971 .

[9]  E. Tulving,et al.  Effects of three types of repetition on cued and noncued recall of words , 1973 .

[10]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  Haley A. Vlach,et al.  The spacing effect in children’s memory and category induction , 2008, Cognition.

[12]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. , 1978 .

[13]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[14]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. , 1988 .

[15]  J. Richardson The availability and effectiveness of reported mediators in associative learning: A historical review and an experimental investigation , 1998 .

[16]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Predicting one's own forgetting: the role of experience-based and theory-based processes. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  R. Bjork,et al.  Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  H. Pashler,et al.  Recent Research on Human Learning Challenges Conventional Instructional Strategies , 2010 .

[19]  Nate Kornell,et al.  A cognitive-science based programme to enhance study efficacy in a high and low risk setting , 2007, The European journal of cognitive psychology.

[20]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Optimising Learning Using Flashcards: Spacing Is More Effective Than Cramming , 2009 .

[21]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Metacognitive Judgments and Control of Study , 2022 .

[22]  Frank N. Dempster Informing classroom practice: What we know about several task characteristics and their effects on learning , 1988 .

[23]  Eugene B. Zechmeister,et al.  When you know that you know and when you think that you know but you don't. , 1980 .

[24]  H. Pashler,et al.  Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[26]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Nate Kornell,et al.  The pretesting effect: do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning? , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[28]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect". , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  L. Groninger,et al.  Mnemonic imagery and forgetting , 1971 .

[30]  Yaacov Schul,et al.  On the Cognitive Benefits of Teaching , 1980 .

[31]  T. S. Hyde,et al.  Recall for words as a function of semantic, graphic, and syntactic orienting tasks. , 1973 .

[32]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[33]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Scaffolding feedback to maximize long-term error correction , 2010 .

[35]  H. F. Spitzer Studies in retention. , 1939 .

[36]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  The virtues of ignorance , 2010, Behavioural Processes.

[37]  J. Winegardner Memory Rehabilitation: Integrating Theory and Practice , 2010 .

[38]  Daniel T. Willingham,et al.  What Will Improve a Student’s Memory? , 2013 .

[39]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Simultaneous decisions at study: time allocation, ordering, and spacing , 2009 .