Investment in hydrogen tri-generation for wastewater treatment plants under uncertainties

Abstract In this article, we present a compound real option model for investment in hydrogen tri-generation and onsite hydrogen dispensing systems for a wastewater treatment plant under price and market uncertainties. The ultimate objective is to determine optimal timing and investment thresholds to exercise initial and subsequent options such that the total savings are maximized. Initial option includes investment in a 1.4 (MW) Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC) fed by mixture of waste biogas from anaerobic digestion and natural gas, along with auxiliary equipment. Produced hydrogen in MCFC via internal reforming, is recovered from the exhaust gas stream using Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) purification technology. Therefore the expansion option includes investment in hydrogen compression, storage and dispensing (CSD) systems which creates additional revenue by selling hydrogen onsite in retail price. This work extends current state of investment modeling within the context of hydrogen tri-generation by considering: (i) Modular investment plan for hydrogen tri-generation and dispensing systems, (ii) Multiple sources of uncertainties along with more realistic probability distributions, (iii) Optimal operation of hydrogen tri-generation is considered, which results in realistic saving estimation.

[1]  Dennis E. Logue,et al.  Handbook of Modern Finance , 1984 .

[2]  Joan M. Ogden,et al.  Understanding the design and economics of distributed tri-generation systems for home and neighborhood refueling—Part II: Neighborhood system case studies , 2012 .

[3]  Joan M. Ogden,et al.  Understanding the Design and Economics of Distributed Tri-generation Systems for Home and Neighborhood Refueling: Residential Case Studies , 2010 .

[4]  P. Boyle.  Options: A Monte Carlo approach , 1977 .

[5]  Eduardo S. Schwartz.  The stochastic behavior of commodity prices: Implications for valuation and hedging , 1997 .

[6]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[7]  Marcus Schulmerich.  Real Options Valuation: The Importance of Interest Rate Modelling in Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[8]  Christopher Yang,et al.  Analysis of the design and economics of molten carbonate fuel cell tri-generation systems providing heat and power for commercial buildings and H2 for FC vehicles , 2013 .

[9]  Pere Margalef,et al.  Efficiency of poly-generating high temperature fuel cells , 2011 .

[10]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  The Valuation of American Put Options , 1977 .

[11]  Andrea Gamba,et al.  An Extension of Least Squares Monte Carlo Simulation for Multi-options Problems 1 , 2002 .

[12]  S. Ross,et al.  Option pricing: A simplified approach☆ , 1979 .

[13]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Short-Term Variations and Long-Term Dynamics in Commodity Prices , 2000 .

[14]  Jonathan X. Weinert,et al.  Hydrogen refueling station costs in Shanghai , 2006 .

[15]  R. McDonald,et al.  The Value of Waiting to Invest , 1982 .

[16]  Brian D. James,et al.  Analysis of the Transition to Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles and thePotential Hydrogen Energy Infrastructure Requirements , 2008 .

[17]  R. Pindyck.  The Dynamics of Commodity Spot and Futures Markets: A Primer , 2001 .

[18]  Francis A. Longstaff,et al.  Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach , 2001 .

[19]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Linear Programming and Network Flows , 1977 .