Automated electrohysterographic detection of uterine contractions for monitoring of pregnancy: feasibility and prospects

BackgroundPreterm birth is a major public health problem in developed countries. In this context, we have conducted research into outpatient monitoring of uterine electrical activity in women at risk of preterm delivery. The objective of this preliminary study was to perform automated detection of uterine contractions (without human intervention or tocographic signal, TOCO) by processing the EHG recorded on the abdomen of pregnant women. The feasibility and accuracy of uterine contraction detection based on EHG processing were tested and compared to expert decision using external tocodynamometry (TOCO) .MethodsThe study protocol was approved by local Ethics Committees under numbers ID-RCB 2016-A00663-48 for France and VSN 02-0006-V2 for Iceland.Two populations of women were included (threatened preterm birth and labour) in order to test our system of recognition of the various types of uterine contractions.EHG signal acquisition was performed according to a standardized protocol to ensure optimal reproducibility of EHG recordings. A system of 18 Ag/AgCl surface electrodes was used by placing 16 recording electrodes between the woman’s pubis and umbilicus according to a 4 × 4 matrix. TOCO was recorded simultaneously with EHG recording.EHG signals were analysed in real-time by calculation of the nonlinear correlation coefficient H2. A curve representing the number of correlated pairs of signals according to the value of H2 calculated between bipolar signals was then plotted. High values of H2 indicated the presence of an event that may correspond to a contraction.Two tests were performed after detection of an event (fusion and elimination of certain events) in order to increase the contraction detection rate.ResultsThe EHG database contained 51 recordings from pregnant women, with a total of 501 contractions previously labelled by analysis of the corresponding tocographic recording. The percentage recognitions obtained by application of the method based on coefficient H2 was 100% with 782% of false alarms. Addition of fusion and elimination tests to the previously obtained detections allowed the false alarm rate to be divided by 8.5, while maintaining an excellent detection rate (96%).ConclusionThese preliminary results appear to be encouraging for monitoring of uterine contractions by algorithm-based automated detection to process the electrohysterographic signal (EHG). This compact recording system, based on the use of surface electrodes attached to the skin, appears to be particularly suitable for outpatient monitoring of uterine contractions, possibly at home, allowing telemonitoring of pregnancies. One of the advantages of EHG processing is that useful information concerning contraction efficiency can be extracted from this signal, which is not possible with the TOCO signal.

[1]  C. Marque,et al.  Use of the electrohysterogram signal for characterization of contractions during pregnancy , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Sandy Rihana,et al.  Preterm labour detection by use of a biophysical marker: the uterine electrical activity , 2007, BMC pregnancy and childbirth.

[3]  Comparing the performance of a new disposable pneumatic tocodynamometer with a standard tocodynamometer , 2016, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[4]  N. Winer,et al.  Cause of Preterm Birth as a Prognostic Factor for Mortality , 2016, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  A. Miles,et al.  Correlation of external and internal monitoring of uterine activity in a cohort of term patients. , 2001, American journal of perinatology.

[6]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Study protocol: PoPE-Prediction of Preterm delivery by Electrohysterography , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[7]  Brynjar Karlsson,et al.  The Icelandic 16-electrode electrohysterogram database , 2015, Scientific Data.

[8]  M. Lucovnik,et al.  Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  Michael Johannes Rooijakkers,et al.  Automated Conduction Velocity Analysis in the Electrohysterogram for Prediction of Imminent Delivery: A Preliminary Study , 2013, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[10]  Preben Kidmose,et al.  Velocity and Directionality of the Electrohysterographic Signal Propagation , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  Ana Pilar Betran,et al.  The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. , 2010, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[12]  Catherine Marque,et al.  Comparison of Different EHG Feature Selection Methods for the Detection of Preterm Labor , 2013, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[13]  C Marque,et al.  [Evolution of electrohysterogram signals synchronization according to term of pregnancy: interest for preterm labor diagnosis]. , 2012, Gynecologie, obstetrique & fertilite.

[14]  J. Gondry,et al.  Évolution de la synchronisation des signaux de l’électromyogramme utérin en fonction du terme de grossesse, et intérêt pour la détection précoce de la menace d’accouchement prématuré , 2012 .

[15]  M Gissler,et al.  Preterm birth time trends in Europe: a study of 19 countries , 2013, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  G. Saade,et al.  Uterine Electromyography and Light-Induced Fluorescence in the Management of Term and Preterm Labor , 2002, The Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation: JSGI.

[17]  Dorothee E. Marossero,et al.  Spatiotemporal electrohysterography patterns in normal and arrested labor. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  Barrie Hayes-Gill,et al.  Accuracy and Reliability of Uterine Contraction Identification Using Abdominal Surface Electrodes , 2012 .

[19]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals , 2008, Physiological measurement.