A framework for quantifying sustainable yield under California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA)

In California, new groundwater legislation—the 2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA)—mandates that groundwater sustainability agencies (GSAs) employ the concept of sustainable yield as their primary management goal. However, SGMA’s current definition of sustainable yield does not offer clear guidance for new agencies and lacks grounding in physics. This study presents a novel hydrologically based framework for quantifying sustainable yield under SGMA that is derived from a synthesis of scientific inquiry and analysis. We introduce a flexible three-step approach that basin managers can rely on to quantify sustainable yield values, incorporate the impact of “undesirable results”, and analyze groundwater sustainability over SGMA’s implementation horizon. Our framework is illustrated through a case study of the South San Joaquin Irrigation District, a proposed GSA in one of California’s critically overdrafted groundwater basins. We calculate sustainable yield for three different management scenarios and assess the impact of each scenario on future groundwater sustainability by performing an annual water groundwater balance through 2040. Our sustainable yield framework can be used as a basis for the development of SGMA’s groundwater management plans throughout California.

[1]  S. Lohman,et al.  Ground-Water Hydraulics , 1972 .

[2]  A. Flint,et al.  Fine-scale hydrologic modeling for regional landscape applications: the California Basin Characterization Model development and performance , 2013, Ecological Processes.

[3]  R. Maxwell,et al.  Interdependence of groundwater dynamics and land-energy feedbacks under climate change , 2008 .

[4]  J. Gun,et al.  Reconciling Groundwater Storage Depletion Due to Pumping with Sustainability , 2010 .

[5]  Stanley A Leake,et al.  The Journey from Safe Yield to Sustainability , 2004, Ground water.

[6]  S. Leake,et al.  Depletion and Capture: Revisiting “The Source of Water Derived from Wells” , 2014, Ground water.

[7]  Emilio Custodio,et al.  Aquifer overexploitation: what does it mean? , 2002 .

[8]  The water budget myth revisited: why hydrogeologists model. , 2002, Ground water.

[9]  R. Howitt,et al.  Hydroeconomic modeling of sustainable groundwater management , 2017 .

[10]  S. Swenson,et al.  Quantifying renewable groundwater stress with GRACE , 2015, Water resources research.

[11]  Harold Conkling,et al.  Utilization of Ground-Water Storage in Stream System Development , 1945 .

[12]  J. F. Devlin,et al.  The persistence of the water budget myth and its relationship to sustainability , 2005 .

[13]  Marios Sophocleous,et al.  From safe yield to sustainable development of water resources—the Kansas experience , 2000 .

[14]  John F. Devlin,et al.  The persistence of the water budget myth and its relationship to sustainability , 2006 .

[15]  Diana M. Allen,et al.  Modeled impacts of predicted climate change on recharge and groundwater levels , 2006 .

[16]  Mary C Hill,et al.  The Practical Use of Simplicity in Developing Ground Water Models , 2006, Ground water.

[17]  D. Whittemore,et al.  A new approach for assessing the future of aquifers supporting irrigated agriculture , 2016 .

[18]  Kirsten Rudestam,et al.  Sustainable Yield in Theory and Practice: Bridging Scientific and Mainstream Vernacular , 2014, Ground water.

[19]  J. Viers,et al.  100 years of California’s water rights system: patterns, trends and uncertainty , 2014 .

[20]  R. Reedy,et al.  Groundwater depletion and sustainability of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  F. Kalf,et al.  Applicability and methodology of determining sustainable yield in groundwater systems , 2005 .

[22]  K. Belitz,et al.  Assessment of regional change in nitrate concentrations in groundwater in the Central Valley, California, USA, 1950s–2000s , 2013, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[23]  William M. Alley,et al.  Sustainability of ground-water resources , 1999 .

[24]  Gerrit Schoups,et al.  Sustainability of irrigated agriculture in the San Joaquin Valley, California , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  H. Loáiciga.  The Safe Yield and Climatic Variability: Implications for Groundwater Management , 2017, Ground water.

[26]  T. Harter,et al.  Potential to assess nitrate leaching vulnerability of irrigated cropland , 2015, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[27]  Yongxin Xu,et al.  Sustainable groundwater use, the capture principle, and adaptive management , 2007 .

[28]  M. Sophocleous.  Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science , 2002 .

[29]  C. Faunt,et al.  Water availability and land subsidence in the Central Valley, California, USA , 2016, Hydrogeology Journal.

[30]  D. Whittemore,et al.  Assessing the major drivers of water-level declines: new insights into the future of heavily stressed aquifers , 2016 .

[31]  Yangxiao Zhou,et al.  A critical review of groundwater budget myth, safe yield and sustainability , 2009 .

[32]  M. Maimone.  Defining and Managing Sustainable Yield , 2004, Ground water.