Optimization of the number of openhole packers in horizontal wells completed by inflow control devices for different types of reservoirs

Openhole packers are completion hardwares that are deployed as a part of the ICDs completion system to produce a more uniform inflow profile. From the perspective of the operability and the economy of the ICDs completion system, the number of openhole packers needs to be optimized in order to achieve the most cost-effective completion solution for different types of reservoirs. In this study, both steady-state approach and transient-state approach are used to evaluate the effects of the ICDs completion with openhole packers on the inflow equalization and the well performance optimization. The steady-state approach employs a semianalytical model that considers reservoir heterogeneity and pressure drops in the annulus, tubing, and ICDs. The transientstate approach employs an advanced multisegment well model of the reservoir simulator EclipseTM. The simulation results indicate that: (i) For a high-permeability homogeneous reservoir, the most cost-effective completion solution should not use openhole packers in the ICDs completion system; (ii) For a heterogeneous sand reservoir, the simulation needs to be performed in order to find the optimum number of openhole packers depending on the degree of reservoir heterogeneity; (iii) For a fractured carbonate reservoir, the number of openhole packers needs to be maximized in order to guarantee that there is only one ICD joint per compartment.

[1]  Mansoor Ahmed A Vision for Future Upstream Technologies , 2010 .

[2]  Michael J. Economides,et al.  Horizontal Well Damage Characterization and Removal , 1993 .

[3]  Khalid Aziz,et al.  General wellbore flow model for horizontal, vertical, and slanted well completions , 1996 .

[4]  Drew E. Hembling,et al.  Advanced Well Completions Result in Enhanced Well Productivity and Recovery in Saudi Aramco's Offshore Fields , 2007 .

[5]  Louis J. Durlofsky,et al.  Approximate Model for Productivity of Nonconventional Wells in Heterogeneous Reservoirs , 2000 .

[6]  Knut Herman Henriksen,et al.  Case Study: The Application of Inflow Control Devices in the Troll Field , 2006 .

[7]  Paolo Gavioli,et al.  The Evolution of the Role of Openhole Packers in Advanced Horizontal Completions: From Novel Technology to a Critical Key to Success , 2012 .

[8]  H. J. Ramey,et al.  The Use of Source and Green's Functions in Solving Unsteady-Flow Problems in Reservoirs , 1973 .

[9]  Karen Bybee Production Operations: Inflow-Control Devices , 2008 .

[10]  Louis J. Durlofsky,et al.  Efficient modeling of nonconventional wells with downhole inflow control devices , 2003 .

[11]  H. Nasr-El-Din,et al.  Effect of HCl Acid and Brines on Water-Swelling Packers , 2010 .

[12]  Ali H. Dogru,et al.  Modeling of Equalizer Production System and Smart Well Applications in Full-Field Studies , 2007 .

[13]  David R. Davies,et al.  Inflow-control devices , 2008 .

[14]  Paolo Gavioli,et al.  Design, Analysis, and Diagnostics for Passive Inflow Control Devices with Openhole Packer Completions , 2010 .

[15]  Zhuoyi Li,et al.  Understanding the Roles of Inflow-Control Devices in Optimizing Horizontal-Well Performance , 2011 .

[16]  C. Atkinson,et al.  A semi-analytical model for predicting the flow into a wellbore completed by inflow control devices , 2007 .

[17]  David R. Davies,et al.  Application of inflow control devices to heterogeneous reservoirs , 2011 .

[18]  David R. Davies,et al.  Inflow Control Devices: Application and Value Quantification of a Developing Technology , 2007 .

[19]  Liang-Biao Ouyang Practical Consideration of an Inflow-Control Device Application for Reducing Water Production , 2009 .