In prediction of acoustical behavior of porous materials, five geometrical parameters play a very important role, but some of these geometrical properties are very difficult to measure directly. So many authors have suggested different inversion strategies for getting these properties from directly measured both characteristic and surface properties of the material using standing wave tube. These approaches can be divided in two different categories: analytical (based on the limit behaviour of the bulk properties) and minimization based methods (which make use of searching algorithms to determine the best solution that minimizes a cost function calculated by means of a prediction model). Recent studies have shown the reliability of the analytical methods for the determination of the airflow resistivity and the minimization based approach by using genetic algorithms for getting the other physical parameters. Consequently, a hybrid inversion technique can be proposed for the complete calculation of the geom...
[1]
J. Allard.
Propagation of Sound in Porous Media: Modelling Sound Absorbing Materials
,
1994
.
[2]
Raymond Panneton,et al.
Acoustical determination of the parameters governing viscous dissipation in porous media.
,
2006,
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3]
F. Pompoli,et al.
19th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2007 COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT INVERSION TECHNIQUES FOR DETERMINING PHYSICAL PARAMETERS OF POROUS MEDIA
,
2007
.
[4]
Walter Lauriks,et al.
Evaluation of tortuosity in acoustic porous materials saturated by air
,
1994
.
[5]
Yvan Champoux,et al.
Air‐based system for the measurement of porosity
,
1991
.
[6]
Robert F. Lambert,et al.
Standing wave apparatus for measuring fundamental properties of acoustic materials in air
,
1990
.