Artificial neural network modelling of uncertainty in gamma-ray spectrometry

Abstract An artificial neural network (ANN) model for the prediction of measuring uncertainties in gamma-ray spectrometry was developed and optimized. A three-layer feed-forward ANN with back-propagation learning algorithm was used to model uncertainties of measurement of activity levels of eight radionuclides (226Ra, 238U, 235U, 40K, 232Th, 134Cs, 137Cs and 7Be) in soil samples as a function of measurement time. It was shown that the neural network provides useful data even from small experimental databases. The performance of the optimized neural network was found to be very good, with correlation coefficients ( R 2 ) between measured and predicted uncertainties ranging from 0.9050 to 0.9915. The correlation coefficients did not significantly deteriorate when the network was tested on samples with greatly different uranium-to-thorium (238U/232Th) ratios. The differences between measured and predicted uncertainties were not influenced by the absolute values of uncertainties of measured radionuclide activities. Once the ANN is trained, it could be employed in analyzing soil samples regardless of the 238U/232Th ratio. It was concluded that a considerable saving in time could be obtained using the trained neural network model for predicting the measurement times needed to attain the desired statistical accuracy.

[1]  J. Zupan,et al.  Separation of data on the training and test set for modelling: a case study for modelling of five colour properties of a white pigment , 2003 .

[2]  Antonije Onjia,et al.  Optimization of artificial neural network for retention modeling in high-performance liquid chromatography. , 2004, Talanta.

[3]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Neural network based modelling of environmental variables: A systematic approach , 2001 .

[4]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[5]  P. Gemperline,et al.  Spectroscopic calibration and quantitation using artificial neural networks , 1990 .

[6]  V. Vigneron,et al.  Statistical modelling of neural networks in γ-spectrometry , 1996 .

[7]  Vojislav Kecman,et al.  New approach to dynamic modelling of vapour-compression liquid chillers: artificial neural networks , 2001 .

[8]  T. Rades,et al.  Use of artificial neural networks to predict quaternery phase systems from limited experimental data. , 1999, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[9]  J. Zupan,et al.  Modelling of the river flowrate: the influence of the training set selection , 2000 .

[10]  M. Gevrey,et al.  Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models , 2003 .

[11]  I. Raimundo,et al.  Simultaneous determination of Zn(II), Cd(II) and Hg(II) in water , 2003 .

[12]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  The effect of internal parameters and geometry on the performance of back-propagation neural networks: an empirical study , 1998 .

[13]  Germà Garcia-Belmonte,et al.  A new approach to automatic radiation spectrum analysis , 1991 .

[14]  Kiyoshi Shizuma,et al.  Application of neural networks for the analysis of gamma-ray spectra measured with a Ge spectrometer , 2002 .

[15]  V. Rodellar,et al.  Drift problems in the automatic analysis of gamma-ray spectra using associative memory algorithms , 1994 .

[16]  Mira Zečević,et al.  Application of neural networks for response surface modeling in HPLC optimization , 1998 .

[17]  M. Huver,et al.  Application of neural networks to quantitative spectrometry analysis , 1999 .

[18]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resource variables: a review of modelling issues and applications , 2000, Environ. Model. Softw..