Using a continuum model to predict closure time of gaps in intestinal epithelial cell layers

A two‐dimensional continuum model of collective cell migration is used to predict the closure of gaps in intestinal epithelial cell layers. The model assumes that cell migration is governed by lamellipodia formation, cell–cell adhesion, and cell–substrate adhesion. Model predictions of the gap edge position and complete gap closure time are compared with experimental measures from cell layer scratch assays (also called scratch wound assays). The goal of the study is to combine experimental observations with mathematical descriptions of cell motion to identify effects of gap shape and area on closure time and to propose a method that uses a simple measure (e.g., area) to predict overall gap closure time early in the closure process. Gap closure time is shown to increase linearly with increasing gap area; however, gaps of equal areas but different aspect ratios differ greatly in healing time. Previous methods that calculate overall healing time according to the absolute or percent change in gap area assume that the gap area changes at a constant rate and typically underestimate gap closure time. In this study, data from scratch assays suggest that the rate of change of area is proportional to the first power or square root power of area.

[1]  Pilhwa Lee,et al.  Crawling Cells Can Close Wounds without Purse Strings or Signaling , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  The Elastodynamics of Embryonic Epidermal Wound Closure , 2007 .

[3]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  A reliable method of determining wound healing rate , 2001, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[4]  Gabriel Fenteany,et al.  Signaling pathways and cell mechanics involved in wound closure by epithelial cell sheets , 2000, Current Biology.

[5]  J. Sethian,et al.  Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations , 1988 .

[6]  R. Sekerka,et al.  Stability of a Planar Interface During Solidification of a Dilute Binary Alloy , 1964 .

[7]  David Swigon,et al.  Continuum Model of Collective Cell Migration in Wound Healing and Colony Expansion , 2022 .

[8]  T. Gilman,et al.  Wound Outcomes: The Utility of Surface Measures , 2004, The international journal of lower extremity wounds.

[9]  W. Lamorte,et al.  The influence of wound geometry on the measurement of wound healing rates in clinical trials. , 1996, Journal of vascular surgery.

[10]  T. Phillips,et al.  Early healing rates and wound area measurements are reliable predictors of later complete wound closure , 2008, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[11]  Ei-ichi Hanzawa,et al.  Classical solutions of the Stefan problem , 1981 .

[12]  G. T. Watts Wound shape and tissue tension in healing , 1960, The British journal of surgery.

[13]  S. Osher,et al.  A Simple Level Set Method for Solving Stefan Problems , 1997, Journal of Computational Physics.

[14]  D. Steed,et al.  Wound healing trajectories as predictors of effectiveness of therapeutic agents. , 2000, Archives of surgery.

[15]  F. Vermolen,et al.  A mathematical analysis of physiological and morphological aspects of wound closure , 2009, Journal of mathematical biology.

[16]  R. Mani,et al.  Outcome Measurements in Wound Healing Are Not Inclusive: A Way Forward , 2007, The international journal of lower extremity wounds.

[17]  Nonlinear modeling of venous leg ulcer healing rates , 2009, BMC dermatology.

[18]  J M Zahm,et al.  Cell migration and proliferation during the in vitro wound repair of the respiratory epithelium. , 1997, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[19]  R. Diegelmann,et al.  Wound healing: an overview of acute, fibrotic and delayed healing. , 2004, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[20]  M. Franz,et al.  Use of the wound healing trajectory as an outcome determinant for acute wound healing , 2000, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[21]  J. Snowden,et al.  Wound closure: an analysis of the relative contributions of contraction and epithelialization. , 1984, The Journal of surgical research.

[22]  J A Sherratt,et al.  Article Commentary: Epidermal Wound Healing: The Clinical Implications of a Simple Mathematical Model , 1992, Cell transplantation.

[23]  Cornelis Vuik,et al.  A level set method for three dimensional vector Stefan problems: Dissolution of stoichiometric particles in multi-component alloys , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[24]  J. Murray,et al.  Mechanistic model of wound contraction. , 1993, The Journal of surgical research.