The emergence of primary strategies in evolving virtual-plant populations

A common practice by those searching for generalities in ecological systems has been to form species groups according to similarities in their suites of traits (termed a ‘strategy’). Field and theoretical studies have strongly suggested that resource availability and disturbance frequency have played primary selective roles in the evolution of species traits that has resulted in the existence of a predictable pattern of strategy variation within a resource–disturbance parameter space. We investigated whether this recognizable pattern (of strategy variation) would emerge if model plant populations evolved in environments contrasting in nitrogen availability and disturbance frequency alone. To address this, a mutable single plant model was developed that incorporated 29 mutable parameters controlling plant life history, physiological and morphological traits. Populations of these were ‘grown’ in a spatially explicit model environment that allowed mechanistic competition for light and nitrogen and long-term, multi-generational simulations. The strategies that evolved showed a pattern of variation that strongly conformed to plant strategy theory. Our model provides strong supporting evidence that resource availability and disturbance frequency can act as primary selective forces in plant evolution, resulting in the existence of predictable, environmentally correlated suites of traits. However, several plant traits did not evolve as predicted by field evidence and the reasons for this are discussed.

[1]  Geir Huse,et al.  Artificial Evolution of Life History and Behavior , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[2]  B. Bolker,et al.  Spatial Moment Equations for Plant Competition: Understanding Spatial Strategies and the Advantages of Short Dispersal , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[3]  K. Niklas The evolutionary biology of plants , 1997 .

[4]  John R. Evans,et al.  Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area , 1998, Oecologia.

[5]  G. Ågren,et al.  Theories and methods on plant nutrition and growth , 1992 .

[6]  R. Yanai,et al.  The Ecology of Root Lifespan , 1997 .

[7]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Inherent Variation in Growth Rate Between Higher Plants: A Search for Physiological Causes and Ecological Consequences , 1992 .

[8]  S. Stearns Trade-offs in life-history evolution , 1989 .

[9]  G. Yedid,et al.  Macroevolution simulated with autonomously replicating computer programs , 2002, Nature.

[10]  C. Topping,et al.  Trait evolution in an individual-based model of herbaceous vegetation , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[11]  F. Schieving,et al.  Carbon gain in a multispecies canopy: the role of specific leaf area and photosynthetic nitrogen‐use efficiency in the tragedy of the commons , 1999 .

[12]  J. Lovett-Doust,et al.  Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties , 2002 .

[13]  T. R. E. Southwood,et al.  Tactics, strategies and templets* , 1988 .

[14]  J. Schmitt Is photomorphogenic shade avoidance adaptive? Perspectives from population biology , 1997 .

[15]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Inherent variation in plant growth : physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences , 1998 .

[16]  William M. Schaffer,et al.  Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities , 1989 .

[17]  P. Reich,et al.  Generality of leaf trait relationships: a test across six biomes: Ecology , 1999 .

[18]  D. Clarkson PHOSPHORUS SUPPLY AND GROWTH RATE IN SPECIES OF AGROSTIS L. , 1967 .

[19]  Stephen C. Stearns,et al.  Evolution: An Introduction , 2000 .

[20]  A. D. Peuke,et al.  The effects of light on induction, time courses, and kinetic patterns of net nitrate uptake in barley , 1998 .

[21]  J. Silvertown The paradox of seed size and adaptation. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Tragedy of the commons as a result of root competition , 2001 .

[23]  William G. Lee,et al.  C-S-R triangle theory: community-level predictions, tests, evaluation of criticisms, and relation to other theories , 2000 .

[24]  P. Greenslade,et al.  Adversity Selection and the Habitat Templet , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[25]  Craig Loehle,et al.  On the relationship between r/K selection and environmental carrying capacity: a new habitat templet for plant life history strategies. , 1990 .

[26]  Mark Westoby,et al.  A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[27]  R. Aerts Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems : a triangular relationship , 1997 .

[28]  Eric R. Pianka,et al.  On r- and K-Selection , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[29]  P. Dijkstra Cause and effect of differences in specific leaf area , 1989 .

[30]  Strategies of resource capture by plants—Evidence for adversity selection , 1986 .

[31]  Martin Kent,et al.  Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical Approach , 1992 .

[32]  W. Post,et al.  Global patterns of soil nitrogen storage , 1985, Nature.

[33]  M. Begon,et al.  Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities, 3rd edn. , 1997 .

[34]  D. Robinson Resource Capture by Localized Root Proliferation: Why Do Plants Bother? , 1996 .

[35]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[36]  A. Mcdonald Phenotypic variation in growth rate as affected by N-supply : its effects on NAR, LWR and SLA , 1990 .

[37]  K. Thompson,et al.  Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants , 1997 .

[38]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants Revisited: A Re-evaluation of Processes and Patterns , 1999 .

[39]  P. Grubb A reassessment of the strategies of plants which cope with shortages of resources , 1998 .

[40]  M. Werger,et al.  Patterns of light and nitrogen distribution in relation to whole canopy carbon gain in C3 and C4 mono- and dicotyledonous species , 1995, Oecologia.

[41]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Evolution of Suites of Traits in Response to Environmental Stress , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[42]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. , 1980 .

[43]  H. Reynolds,et al.  The ecological significance of plasticity in root weight ratio in response to nitrogen: Opinion , 1996, Plant and Soil.