Hydrogen production by methanol‐steam reforming using NiMoCu/γ‐alumina trimetallic catalysts

Recent attention has focused on steam reforming (SR) of methanol to produce high-purity hydrogen for ‘clean’ energy applications. Methanol (as a hydrogen carrier) is a renewable and easily accessible energy source that can be produced from biomass and natural gas; the advantages are its availability, high energy density, relative low cost, and easy storage and transportation. In the hydrogen production processes, catalysts play a very critical role for increasing the hydrogen yield and purity as well as reducing by-products. In this study, the thermodynamic parameters of the methanol-SR reaction were evaluated. Several NiMoCu/γ-alumina trimetallic catalysts with different compositions were prepared by a wet impregnation method. The hydrogen production efficiency of the catalysts was evaluated for the methanol-SR reaction. Thermodynamic studies of the reaction showed that methanol-SR was an exothermic and spontaneous reaction for all catalysts investigated. Thermodynamic considerations revealed that a catalyst with a composition of 7 wt% Cu, 0.2 wt% Mo and 0.2 wt% Ni was the most reactive catalyst with an enthalpy of − 663.102 kcal. Experimental results showed that the optimum reaction occurred at 548 K and pressure of 3 bar. At these conditions, the production of undesirable by-products such as CO and CO2 was negligible. Copyright © 2009 Curtin University of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Xiaohong Li,et al.  Methanol steam reforming over Pd/ZnO: Catalyst preparation and pretreatment studies , 2003 .

[2]  G. Germani,et al.  Production of hydrogen by partial oxidation of methanol over ZnO-supported palladium catalysts prepared by microemulsion technique , 2003 .

[3]  Andrew T. Harris,et al.  Hydrogen production from biomass coupled with carbon dioxide capture: The implications of thermodynamic equilibrium , 2007 .

[4]  Ryuji Kikuchi,et al.  Thermodynamic evaluation of methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production , 2006 .

[5]  Y. Kamiya,et al.  Deterioration in fuel cell performance resulting from hydrogen fuel containing impurities: poisoning effects by CO, CH4, HCHO and HCOOH , 2003 .

[6]  J. C. Amphlett,et al.  Hydrogen production by the catalytic steam reforming of methanol part 1: The thermodynamics , 1981 .

[7]  S. Gwaltney,et al.  A thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production by steam reforming of glycerol , 2007 .

[8]  S. Saxena,et al.  A fossil-fuel based recipe for clean energy , 2008 .

[9]  Scott Q. Turn,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Hydrogen Production from Glycerin Reforming , 2007 .

[10]  Fausto Gallucci,et al.  Hydrogen production by methanol steam reforming carried out in membrane reactor on Cu/Zn/Mg-based catalyst , 2008 .

[11]  Harvey G. Stenger,et al.  Water gas shift reaction kinetics and reactor modeling for fuel cell grade hydrogen , 2003 .

[12]  V. Formanski,et al.  Compact hydrogen production systems for solid polymer fuel cells , 1998 .

[13]  B. Höhlein,et al.  Compact methanol reformer test for fuel-cell powered light-duty vehicles , 1998 .

[14]  A. Ersöz,et al.  A simulated auto‐thermal membrane reformer process for a PEM fuel cell micro cogeneration unit , 2009 .