Increasing Robustness in the Detection of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson’s Disease

This paper focuses on detecting freezing of gait in Parkinson’s patients using body-worn accelerometers. In this study, we analyzed the robustness of four feature sets, two of which are new features adapted from speech processing: mel frequency cepstral coefficients and quality assessment metrics. For classification based on these features, we compared random forest, multilayer perceptron, hidden Markov models, and deep neural networks. These algorithms were evaluated using a leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) cross validation to match the situation where a system is being constructed for patients for whom there is no training data. This evaluation was performed using the Daphnet dataset, which includes recordings from ten patients using three accelerometers situated on the ankle, knee, and lower back. We obtained a reduction from 17.3% to 12.5% of the equal error rate compared to the previous best results using this dataset and LOSO testing. For high levels of sensitivity (such as 0.95), the specificity increased from 0.63 to 0.75. The biggest improvement across all of the feature sets and algorithms tested in this study was obtained by integrating information from longer periods of time in a deep neural network with convolutional layers.

[1]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[2]  Nir Giladi,et al.  Characterization of freezing of gait subtypes and the response of each to levodopa in Parkinson's disease , 2003, European journal of neurology.

[3]  M. Mcdermott,et al.  Mood fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease: a pilot study comparing the effects of intravenous and oral levodopa administration , 2005, Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment.

[4]  Jorge J. Gómez-Sanz,et al.  Development of intelligent multisensor surveillance systems with agents , 2007, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[5]  Nir Giladi,et al.  Freezing of gait affects quality of life of peoples with Parkinson's disease beyond its relationships with mobility and gait , 2007, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[6]  J. Jankovic,et al.  Movement Disorder Society‐sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results , 2008, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[7]  W. Ondo,et al.  Ambulatory monitoring of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Wearable Assistant for Parkinson’s Disease Patients With the Freezing of Gait Symptom , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[9]  J. Cudeiro,et al.  Effect of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Gait in Parkinsonian Patients with and without Freezing of Gait , 2010, PloS one.

[10]  R. Zengerle,et al.  Ambulatory Treatment and Telemonitoring of Patients with Parkinson’s Disease , 2011 .

[11]  M. Hallett,et al.  Freezing of gait: moving forward on a mysterious clinical phenomenon , 2011, The Lancet Neurology.

[12]  Joan Cabestany,et al.  Dyskinesia and motor state detection in Parkinson's Disease patients with a single movement sensor , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  Sinziana Mazilu,et al.  Online detection of freezing of gait with smartphones and machine learning techniques , 2012, 2012 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops.

[14]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Is Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease a Result of Multiple Gait Impairments? Implications for Treatment , 2012, Parkinson's disease.

[15]  Peter Andras,et al.  On preserving statistical characteristics of accelerometry data using their empirical cumulative distribution , 2013, ISWC '13.

[16]  Thomas Seidl,et al.  Prediction of freezing of gait from Parkinson's Disease movement time series using conditional random fields , 2014, HealthGIS '14.

[17]  R. Song,et al.  Characterizing gait asymmetry via frequency sub-band components of the ground reaction force , 2015, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[18]  Qiang Ye,et al.  Classification of gait rhythm signals between patients with neuro-degenerative diseases and normal subjects: Experiments with statistical features and different classification models , 2015, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[19]  C. Craig,et al.  Auditory cueing in Parkinson's patients with freezing of gait. What matters most: Action-relevance or cue-continuity? , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Deep learning for human activity recognition: A resource efficient implementation on low-power devices , 2016, 2016 IEEE 13th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN).

[21]  Rubén San-Segundo-Hernández,et al.  Segmenting human activities based on HMMs using smartphone inertial sensors , 2016, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[22]  Fernando Fernández Martínez,et al.  Feature extraction from smartphone inertial signals for human activity segmentation , 2016, Signal Process..

[23]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Measuring signal fluctuations in gait rhythm time series of patients with Parkinson's disease using entropy parameters , 2017, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[24]  Henrik Blunck,et al.  Robust Human Activity Recognition using smartwatches and smartphones , 2018, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..