Design Optimization of a Pneumatic Soft Robotic Actuator Using Model-Based Optimization and Deep Reinforcement Learning

We present two frameworks for design optimization of a multi-chamber pneumatic-driven soft actuator to optimize its mechanical performance. The design goal is to achieve maximal horizontal motion of the top surface of the actuator with a minimum effect on its vertical motion. The parametric shape and layout of air chambers are optimized individually with the firefly algorithm and a deep reinforcement learning approach using both a model-based formulation and finite element analysis. The presented modeling approach extends the analytical formulations for tapered and thickened cantilever beams connected in a structure with virtual spring elements. The deep reinforcement learning-based approach is combined with both the model- and finite element-based environments to fully explore the design space and for comparison and cross-validation purposes. The two-chamber soft actuator was specifically designed to be integrated as a modular element into a soft robotic pad system used for pressure injury prevention, where local control of planar displacements can be advantageous to mitigate the risk of pressure injuries and blisters by minimizing shear forces at the skin-pad contact. A comparison of the results shows that designs achieved using the deep reinforcement based approach best decouples the horizontal and vertical motions, while producing the necessary displacement for the intended application. The results from optimizations were compared computationally and experimentally to the empirically obtained design in the existing literature to validate the optimized design and methodology.

[1]  Michael Yu Wang,et al.  Design and Development of a Topology-Optimized Three-Dimensional Printed Soft Gripper. , 2018, Soft robotics.

[2]  Large Deflection of Cantilever Beams I , 2020 .

[3]  Qiang Liu,et al.  Learning to Explore with Meta-Policy Gradient , 2018, ICML 2018.

[4]  Rifat Kurban,et al.  Comparison of evolutionary and swarm based computational techniques for multilevel color image thresholding , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[5]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Soft Robotic Grippers for Biological Sampling on Deep Reefs , 2016, Soft robotics.

[6]  M. Sitti,et al.  Soft Actuators for Small‐Scale Robotics , 2017, Advanced materials.

[7]  A. Polliack,et al.  A New Technology for Reducing Shear and Friction Forces on the Skin: Implications for Blister Care in the Wilderness Setting , 2006, Wilderness & environmental medicine.

[8]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Deformation in Soft-Matter Robotics: A Categorization and Quantitative Characterization , 2015, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[9]  Henk Nijmeijer,et al.  A Computational Design Framework for Pressure-driven Soft Robots through Nonlinear Topology Optimization , 2020, 2020 3rd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft).

[10]  Miad Faezipour,et al.  A smart bed platform for monitoring & Ulcer prevention , 2011, 2011 4th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI).

[11]  Christos Mitrogiannis,et al.  Development of a new bed system with improved decubitus prophylaxis for bed-ridden patients , 2009, 2009 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.

[12]  Hitoshi Hattori,et al.  Framework for design optimization using deep reinforcement learning , 2019, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[13]  Péter L. Várkonyi,et al.  The longest soft robotic arm , 2020 .

[14]  R. Ogden Large deformation isotropic elasticity – on the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids , 1972, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[15]  Yi Sun,et al.  Design and fabrication of a shape-morphing soft pneumatic actuator: Soft robotic pad , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[16]  Soumik Sarkar,et al.  A Case Study of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Engineering Design: Application to Microfluidic Devices for Flow Sculpting , 2019, Journal of Mechanical Design.

[17]  Jian Li,et al.  Chain-Like Granular Jamming: A Novel Stiffness-Programmable Mechanism for Soft Robotics. , 2019, Soft robotics.

[18]  Zhan Kang,et al.  Chamber layout design optimization of soft pneumatic robots , 2020, Smart Materials and Structures.

[19]  D. Reynaerts,et al.  Elastic Inflatable Actuators for Soft Robotic Applications , 2017, Advanced materials.

[20]  Conor Walsh Recent Results from Evaluation of Soft Wearable Robots in Clinical Populations , 2018, Biosystems & Biorobotics.

[21]  Gaetano Zingone,et al.  Deflections of Beams with Varying Rectangular Cross Section , 1992 .

[22]  David Silver,et al.  Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-Learning , 2015, AAAI.

[23]  Alexander Kuhnle,et al.  Direct shape optimization through deep reinforcement learning , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..

[24]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimisation , 2010, Int. J. Bio Inspired Comput..

[25]  Daniel M. Bodily,et al.  Multi-objective design optimization of a soft, pneumatic robot , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[26]  Markus H. Gross,et al.  Computational Design of Rubber Balloons , 2012, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[27]  H. Terashi [Pressure ulcer]. , 2010, Nihon Ronen Igakkai zasshi. Japanese journal of geriatrics.

[28]  Ferdinando Rodriguez y Baena,et al.  Toward a Common Framework for the Design of Soft Robotic Manipulators with Fluidic Actuation , 2018, Soft robotics.

[29]  Cecilia Laschi Soft Robotics Research, Challenges, and Innovation Potential, Through Showcases , 2015 .

[30]  Hailay Weldegiorgis Berhe Penalty function methods using matrix laboratory (MATLAB) , 2012 .

[31]  A. Gandomi,et al.  Mixed variable structural optimization using Firefly Algorithm , 2011 .

[32]  Emílio Carlos Nelli Silva,et al.  Topology optimization applied to the design of actuators driven by pressure loads , 2020 .

[33]  Yi Sun,et al.  Fiber pattern optimization for soft robotic pad , 2020 .

[34]  K. Bertoldi,et al.  Dielectric Elastomer Based “Grippers” for Soft Robotics , 2015, Advanced materials.

[35]  Zoltan Major,et al.  Design and shape optimization of PolyJet bellows actuators , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft).

[36]  Haiying Huang,et al.  Pressure ulcer prevention using soft, non-grasp manipulation in a forcebed , 2017, 2017 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO).

[37]  Annika Raatz,et al.  Design optimization of soft pneumatic actuators using genetic algorithms , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[38]  Mohit Sewak,et al.  Deep Reinforcement Learning , 2020, Deep Reinforcement Learning in Unity.

[39]  Daniela Rus,et al.  A Recipe for Soft Fluidic Elastomer Robots , 2015, Soft robotics.

[40]  J. Paulo Davim,et al.  Firefly Algorithm , 2019, Optimizing Engineering Problems through Heuristic Techniques.

[41]  K. E. Bisshopp,et al.  Large deflection of cantilever beams , 1945 .

[42]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[43]  Mitja Trkov,et al.  IntelliPad: Intelligent Soft Robotic Pad for Pressure Injury Prevention , 2020, 2020 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM).

[44]  Matteo Cianchetti,et al.  Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities , 2016, Science Robotics.

[45]  Yuval Tassa,et al.  Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning , 2015, ICLR.

[46]  Vincent Lebastard,et al.  Dynamics of Continuum and Soft Robots: A Strain Parameterization Based Approach , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.