Sensitivity of the power-law exponent in gene expression distribution to mRNA decay rate

Large-scale acquisition technologies in mRNA abundance (gene expression) have provided new opportunities to better understand many complex biological processes. Lately, it has been reported that the observed gene expression data in several organisms significantly deviates from a Poisson distribution and follows a power-law or fat-tailed distribution. Here, we show that a simple stochastic model of gene expression with intrinsic and extrinsic noise derives the stationary power-law distribution using the Stratonovich calculus. Furthermore, we connect the experimental measure of the power-law exponent with the value of the mRNA decay. Finally, we compare the results with other models where stochastic equations were used within the Ito interpretation.

[1]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[2]  C. Furusawa,et al.  Zipf's law in gene expression. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[3]  Tetsuya Yomo,et al.  Universality and flexibility in gene expression from bacteria to human. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  N. Kampen,et al.  Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry , 1981 .

[5]  Margaret Werner-Washburne,et al.  The genomics of yeast responses to environmental stress and starvation , 2002, Functional & Integrative Genomics.

[6]  J. Hasty,et al.  Noise-based switches and amplifiers for gene expression. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  John D. Storey,et al.  Precision and functional specificity in mRNA decay , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  T. Ochiai,et al.  A constructive approach to gene expression dynamics , 2004, q-bio/0406052.

[9]  M. Thattai,et al.  Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  P. Swain,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  H. Risken Fokker-Planck Equation , 1984 .

[12]  D. Wolf,et al.  On the relationship between genomic regulatory element organization and gene regulatory dynamics. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  K. Entian,et al.  Multiple transcripts regulate glucose-triggered mRNA decay of the lactate transporter JEN1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2005, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[14]  B. Ai,et al.  Correlated noise in a logistic growth model. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  L. Serrano,et al.  Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation , 2000, Nature.

[16]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[17]  Eugene Wong,et al.  Stochastic processes in information and dynamical systems , 1979 .

[18]  David Botstein,et al.  Transcriptional response of steady-state yeast cultures to transient perturbations in carbon source. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  J. Paulsson Summing up the noise in gene networks , 2004, Nature.