Integrated climate and land use change scenarios for California rangeland ecosystem services: wildlife habitat, soil carbon, and water supply

ContextIn addition to biodiversity conservation, California rangelands generate multiple ecosystem services including livestock production, drinking and irrigation water, and carbon sequestration. California rangeland ecosystems have experienced substantial conversion to residential land use and more intensive agriculture.ObjectivesTo understand the potential impacts to rangeland ecosystem services, we developed six spatially explicit (250 m) climate/land use change scenarios for the Central Valley of California and surrounding foothills consistent with three Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change emission scenario narratives.MethodsWe quantified baseline and projected change in wildlife habitat, soil organic carbon (SOC), and water supply (recharge and runoff). For six case study watersheds we quantified the interactions of future development and changing climate on recharge, runoff and streamflow, and precipitation thresholds where dominant watershed hydrological processes shift through analysis of covariance.ResultsThe scenarios show that across the region, habitat loss is expected to occur predominantly in grasslands, primarily due to future development (up to a 37 % decline by 2100), however habitat loss in priority conservation errors will likely be due to cropland and hay/pasture expansion (up to 40 % by 2100). Grasslands in the region contain approximately 100 teragrams SOC in the top 20 cm, and up to 39 % of this SOC is subject to conversion by 2100. In dryer periods recharge processes typically dominate runoff. Future development lowers the precipitation value at which recharge processes dominate runoff, and combined with periods of drought, reduces the opportunity for recharge, especially on deep soils.ConclusionResults support the need for climate-smart land use planning that takes recharge areas into account, which will provide opportunities for water storage in dry years. Given projections for agriculture, more modeling is needed on feedbacks between agricultural expansion on rangelands and water supply.

[1]  Jay R. Lund,et al.  Adapting California’s water system to warm vs. dry climates , 2011 .

[2]  J. Reid Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2003 .

[3]  L. Flint,et al.  California Basin characterization model: a dataset of historical and future hydrologic response to climate change , 2014 .

[4]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  THE WCRP CMIP 3 MULTIMODEL DATASET A New Era in Climate Change Research , 2017 .

[5]  R. Reedy,et al.  Impact of land use and land cover change on groundwater recharge and quality in the southwestern US , 2005 .

[6]  Jacqueline de Chazal,et al.  Land-use and climate change within assessments of biodiversity change: A review , 2009 .

[7]  Shuguang Liu,et al.  A land-use and land-cover modeling strategy to support a national assessment of carbon stocks and fluxes , 2012 .

[8]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment , 2010, Nature.

[9]  Terri S. Hogue,et al.  Integrating hydrologic modeling and land use projections for evaluation of hydrologic response and regional water supply impacts in semi-arid environments , 2012, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[10]  R. Lal,et al.  Soil carbon dynamics in cropland and rangeland. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[11]  G. M. Kondolf,et al.  Land use change in California, USA: Nonpoint source water quality impacts , 1993 .

[12]  Dominique Bachelet,et al.  The impact of climate change on California’s ecosystem services , 2011 .

[13]  G. Yohe,et al.  Climate Change Impacts in the United States , 2014 .

[14]  Pete Smith The potential of US grazing lands to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect , 2002 .

[15]  F. Davis,et al.  Regulatory Protection and Conservation , 2007 .

[16]  Joel R. Brown,et al.  A site-based approach to delivering rangeland ecosystem services , 2011 .

[17]  M. Dettinger,et al.  The key role of dry days in changing regional climate and precipitation regimes , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[18]  J. Wickham,et al.  Completion of the 2001 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States , 2007 .

[19]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  The land-use projections and resulting emissions in the IPCC SRES scenarios scenarios as simulated by the IMAGE 2.2 model , 2004 .

[20]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  A Strategy for Estimating the Rates of Recent United States Land-Cover Changes , 2002 .

[21]  C. Field,et al.  Carbon sequestration in California agriculture, 1980-2000. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[22]  Alan L. Flint,et al.  Downscaling future climate scenarios to fine scales for hydrologic and ecological modeling and analysis , 2012, Ecological Processes.

[23]  Jay R. Lund,et al.  Economic impacts of climate-related changes to California agriculture , 2011 .

[24]  D. A. Duncan,et al.  Vegetation and Environmental Features of Forest and Range Ecosystems , 1977 .

[25]  Limin Yang,et al.  COMPLETION OF THE 1990S NATIONAL LAND COVER DATA SET FOR THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES FROM LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER DATA AND ANCILLARY DATA SOURCES , 2001 .

[26]  D. Goodrich,et al.  Techniques for assessing the environmental outcomes of conservation practices applied to rangeland watersheds , 2011, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[27]  A. Wick,et al.  Changes in soil carbon pools and microbial biomass from urban land development and subsequent post-development soil rehabilitation , 2013 .

[28]  Roger F. Auch,et al.  Scenarios of land use and land cover change in the conterminous United States: Utilizing the special report on emission scenarios at ecoregional scales , 2012 .

[29]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  THE WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change Research , 2007 .

[30]  Terry L Sohl,et al.  Spatially explicit modeling of 1992-2100 land cover and forest stand age for the conterminous United States. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[31]  C. Daly,et al.  Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States , 2008 .

[32]  B. Reed,et al.  Baseline and projected future carbon storage and greenhouse-gas fluxes in ecosystems of the Western United States , 2012 .

[33]  A. Thomson,et al.  The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .

[34]  A. Flint,et al.  Fine-scale hydrologic modeling for regional landscape applications: the California Basin Characterization Model development and performance , 2013, Ecological Processes.

[35]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[36]  W. Silver,et al.  Soil Carbon Pools in California's Annual Grassland Ecosystems , 2010 .

[37]  Anne Choate,et al.  National housing and impervious surface scenarios for integrated climate impact assessments , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  John B. Wright,et al.  Ecological services to and from rangelands of the United States , 2007 .

[39]  Kerri L. Steenwerth,et al.  Soil Biological and Chemical Properties in Restored Perennial Grassland in California , 2005 .

[40]  Robert Ornduff,et al.  Terrestrial Vegetation of California. , 1977 .

[41]  N. Golubiewski Urbanization increases grassland carbon pools: effects of landscaping in Colorado's front range. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[42]  P. Thornton,et al.  Is Proactive Adaptation to Climate Change Necessary in Grazed Rangelands? , 2012 .

[43]  Christopher E. Soulard,et al.  Recent land-use/land-cover change in the Central California Valley , 2015 .

[44]  D. Theobald Landscape Patterns of Exurban Growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020 , 2005 .

[45]  D J Lewis,et al.  Economic-based projections of future land use in the conterminous United States under alternative policy scenarios. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[46]  Oregon State The Impact of Climate Change on California's Ecosystem Services , 2009 .

[47]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios : a special report of Working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2000 .

[48]  Patrick L. Shaver,et al.  Revolutionary Land Use Change in the 21st Century: Is (Rangeland) Science Relevant? , 2012 .

[49]  Kayje Booker,et al.  What can ecological science tell us about opportunities for carbon sequestration on arid rangelands in the United States , 2013 .

[50]  Between a rock and a hard place: the impacts of climate change and housing development on breeding birds in California , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[51]  C. Soulard,et al.  Estimation of late twentieth century land-cover change in California , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[52]  M. Brunson,et al.  Highlights, Rangeland Ecology & Management, March 2008 , 2008 .

[53]  Matt Merrifield,et al.  Mapping Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems in California , 2010, PloS one.

[54]  Jaymee T. Marty,et al.  Whither the Rangeland?: Protection and Conversion in California's Rangeland Ecosystems , 2014, PLoS ONE.

[55]  B. Sleeter Late 20th century land change in the Central California Valley ecoregion , 2008 .