Multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients admitted with a suspected acute coronary syndrome

ObjectivesThe aim of this prospective clinical study was to assess the accuracy and clinical relevance of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCTCA) in patients presenting with acute chest pain.BackgroundMultislice computed tomography coronary angiography has shown ability to detect accurately coronary artery disease (CAD) in selected elective patient groups.MethodsOne hundred and twenty patients presenting with acute chest pain (<24 h) underwent MSCTCA (Siemens Sensation 16) before a scheduled inpatient conventional coronary angiogram (CCA). Exclusion criteria included patients with STEMI, non-sinus rhythm, contraindication to β blockers and renal impairment. Blinded visual assessment of MSCTCA to detect CAD was performed on an 11-segment model. The accuracy of MSCTCA was compared to CCA to detect significant stenoses (≥50%).ResultsOne hundred and thirteen patients underwent both investigations. The prevalence of significant CAD was 74%. 1,243 native segments were assessed by MSCTCA. The overall ability of MSCTCA to detect the presence of ≥1 significant stenosis in all native segments had a sensitivity of 92% (95%CI 83–97%), specificity of 55% (95%CI 35–74%), positive predictive value of 86% (95%CI 76–93%) and negative predictive value of 70% (95%CI 47–87%). 22% of all segments (mostly distal) were non-analyzable. Coronary calcification was a major cause of false positivity.ConclusionIn a prospective study of unselected patients presenting with acute chest pain, the diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice CT coronary angiography was moderate and less than reported from studies in elective patients. The clinical relevance of this technology to screen patients with acute chest pain is limited.Condensed AbstractMultislice CT coronary angiography (MSCTCA) and conventional coronary angiography (CCA) were used to assess 120 patients presenting with acute chest pain. MSCTCA was compared to CCA to detect significant stenoses (≥50%). In 113 directly comparable patients MSCTCA had a sensitivity of 92% (95%CI 83–97%) and specificity of 55% (95%CI 35–74%) to detect the presence of ≥1 significant stenosis in all native segments. In this patient cohort with a high prevalence of coronary disease and coronary calcification, the accuracy and clinical relevance of 16 slice MSCTCA to screen and risk stratify patients with acute chest pain is limited.

[1]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16 x 0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation. , 2005, European heart journal.

[2]  S. Garcia,et al.  Correlation of TIMI risk score with angiographic severity and extent of coronary artery disease in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  G. Raff,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. , 2005 .

[5]  C. Claussen,et al.  Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patients. , 2002, European heart journal.

[6]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Werner Moshage,et al.  Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by Retrospectively ECG-Gated Multislice Spiral CT , 2000, Circulation.

[8]  Peter Wilde,et al.  Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  Pedro A. Lemos,et al.  Reliable Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Fast Submillimeter Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography , 2002, Circulation.

[10]  W. Bautz,et al.  Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses With Thin-Slice Multi-Detector Row Spiral Computed Tomography and Multiplanar Reconstruction , 2003, Circulation.

[11]  M F Reiser,et al.  ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. , 2001, Radiology.

[12]  S. Schroeder,et al.  Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology , 2004 .

[13]  M. Pfisterer,et al.  Limited diagnostic yield of non-invasive coronary angiography by 16-slice multi-detector spiral computed tomography in routine patients referred for evaluation of coronary artery disease. , 2005, European heart journal.

[14]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Predictive Value of 16-Slice Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography to Detect Significant Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients at High Risk for Coronary Artery Disease: Patient- Versus Segment-Based Analysis , 2004, Circulation.

[15]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography is improved at low heart rates , 2006, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[16]  C. Roobottom,et al.  Highly accurate coronary angiography with submillimetre, 16 slice computed tomography , 2005, Heart.

[17]  Stephen Schroeder,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  C. Claussen,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Jonathan Lessick,et al.  Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. , 2006, JAMA.

[21]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  A. Schmermund,et al.  Non-invasive computed tomographic coronary angiography: the end of the beginning. , 2005, European heart journal.

[23]  W. Frishman,et al.  Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Multislice Computed Tomography , 2006 .