Understanding quantum mechanics: a review and synthesis in precise language
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Winter. What does an experimental test of quantum contextuality prove or disprove? , 2014, 1408.0945.
[2] Anthony Sudbery. The logic of the future in quantum theory , 2016, Synthese.
[3] Robert W. Spekkens,et al. Quantum Theory: Informational Foundations and Foils , 2015, 1805.11483.
[4] Allen Stairs. A loose and separate certainty: Caves, Fuchs and Schack on quantum probability one , 2011 .
[5] C. Werndl. On the observational equivalence of continuous-time deterministic and indeterministic descriptions , 2011, 1310.1620.
[6] Jeffrey Bub. Quantum Mechanics is About Quantum Information , 2005 .
[7] C. Fields. Consistent Quantum Mechanics Admits No Mereotopology , 2012, 1205.2887.
[8] Tobias Fox. Haunted by the Spectre of Virtual Particles: A Philosophical Reconsideration , 2008 .
[9] P. Mittelstaedt. Are the Laws of Quantum Logic Laws of Nature? , 2012 .
[10] Jianhao M. Yang,et al. Relational Formulation of Quantum Measurement , 2018, International Journal of Theoretical Physics.
[11] Markus P. Mueller,et al. Quantum theory as a principle theory: insights from an information-theoretic reconstruction , 2017, 1707.05602.
[12] Luigi Accardi,et al. Could we now convince Einstein , 2006 .
[13] Karl Hess,et al. Special Issue: Ever New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests , 2017 .
[14] Ronnie Hermens. Speakable in quantum mechanics , 2012, Synthese.
[15] R. Frigg,et al. Everything you always wanted to know about structural realism but were afraid to ask , 2011 .
[16] Mario Alai. The Debates on Scientific Realism Today: Knowledge and Objectivity in Science , 2017 .
[17] D. Sokolovski. Path probabilities for consecutive measurements, and certain “quantum paradoxes” , 2018, Annals of Physics.
[18] Mark A. Wilson,et al. Determinism and the Mystery of the Missing Physics , 2009, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[19] Marian Kupczynski,et al. Can we close the Bohr–Einstein quantum debate? , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[20] Erik Curiel. On the Existence of Spacetime Structure , 2015, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[21] Weak Values and Consistent Histories in Quantum Theory , 2002, quant-ph/0207182.
[22] D. A. Graft. Rhetoric, logic, and experiment in the quantum nonlocality debate , 2017 .
[23] R. Omnes. Consistent Histories and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 1995 .
[24] P. Kosso,et al. Quantum Mechanics and Realism , 2000 .
[25] Pablo Acuña. Inertial Trajectories in de Broglie-Bohm Quantum Theory: An Unexpected Problem , 2016 .
[26] I. Licata,et al. Fluidodynamical Representation and Quantum Jumps , 2017 .
[27] Wayne C. Myrvold,et al. What is a wavefunction? , 2015, Synthese.
[28] Steven French,et al. Metaphysical underdetermination: why worry? , 2011, Synthese.
[29] Andrei Khrennikov,et al. Bell Could Become the Copernicus of Probability , 2014, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..
[30] A. Zeilinger,et al. A snapshot of foundational attitudes toward quantum mechanics , 2013, 1301.1069.
[31] Buonomano against Bell: Nonergodicity or nonlocality? , 2005, quant-ph/0512178.
[32] R. Omnes. Is Uniqueness of Reality Predicted by the Quantum Laws , 2017 .
[33] D. Bohm. A SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTUM THEORY IN TERMS OF "HIDDEN" VARIABLES. II , 1952 .
[34] E. Schrödinger. Probability relations between separated systems , 1936, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[35] Alastair Wilson. Objective Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics , 2013, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[36] Complementarity of representations in quantum mechanics , 2001, quant-ph/0110102.
[37] P. Rocchi,et al. An Essay on the Double Nature of the Probability , 2012, 1301.5443.
[38] T. P. Singh. Wave function collapse, non-locality, and space-time structure , 2017, 1701.09132.
[39] D. Struppa,et al. Finally making sense of the double-slit experiment , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[40] R. Hughes,et al. The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .
[41] Quentin Ruyant,et al. Can We Make Sense of Relational Quantum Mechanics? , 2018 .
[42] R. G. Torromé. Emergent Quantum Mechanics and the Origin of Quantum Non-local Correlations , 2017, 1707.05465.
[43] Kristel Michielsen,et al. Logical inference derivation of the quantum theoretical description of Stern–Gerlach and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm experiments , 2018, Annals of Physics.
[44] Reductionism, emergence, and effective field theories , 2001, physics/0101039.
[45] R. Kastner. Why the Afshar experiment does not refute complementarity , 2005, quant-ph/0502021.
[46] David Wallace. Quantum Probability from Subjective Likelihood: improving on Deutsch's proof of the probability rule , 2003 .
[47] Michael E. Cuffaro. Reconsidering No-Go Theorems from a Practical Perspective , 2015, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[48] D. Fiscaletti,et al. Searching for an adequate relation between time and entanglement , 2017 .
[49] Bohmian trajectories and the ether: Where does the analogy fail? , 2005, quant-ph/0502049.
[50] A. Peres. Karl Popper and the Copenhagen interpretation , 2002 .
[51] Alejandro Andrés Hnilo,et al. Using Measured Values in Bell's Inequalities Entails at Least One Hypothesis in Addition to Local Realism , 2017, Entropy.
[52] Michael Esfeld,et al. The primitive ontology of quantum physics: guidelines for an assessment of the proposals , 2014, 1406.0732.
[53] Kareem Khalifa,et al. The Role of Explanation in Understanding , 2013, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[54] A. Hagar. Decoherence: the view from the history and philosophy of science , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[55] Selma Dundar-Coecke,et al. Ramifications of quantum physics for education , 2014 .
[56] Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al. A note on different definitions of momentum disturbance , 2013, 1307.3604.
[57] Marian Kupczynski,et al. The Contextuality Loophole is Fatal for the Derivation of Bell Inequalities: Reply to a Comment by I. Schmelzer , 2016, 1611.05021.
[58] Rodolfo Gambini,et al. The Montevideo Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: A Short Review , 2015, Entropy.
[59] H. Fearn,et al. A Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser Explained by the Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2015, 1501.00970.
[60] Giulio Chiribella,et al. Agents, Subsystems, and the Conservation of Information , 2018, Entropy.
[61] Eliahu Cohen,et al. The Weak Reality That Makes Quantum Phenomena More Natural: Novel Insights and Experiments , 2018, Entropy.
[62] Eddy Keming Chen. Our Fundamental Physical Space: An Essay on the Metaphysics of the Wave Function , 2017, 2110.14531.
[63] Diese Verdammte Quantenspringerei , 2000, quant-ph/0011082.
[64] Bradley Monton,et al. The problem of ontology for spontaneous collapse theories , 2004 .
[65] Robert W. Spekkens,et al. Einstein, Incompleteness, and the Epistemic View of Quantum States , 2007, 0706.2661.
[66] R. Dawid,et al. Against the empirical viability of the Deutsch-Wallace-Everett approach to quantum mechanics , 2014 .
[67] M. Esfeld. Collapse or no collapse? What is the best ontology of quantum mechanics in the primitive ontology framework? , 2016, 1611.09218.
[68] G. D’Ariano. Causality re-established , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[69] Edward Fredkin,et al. An Introduction to Digital Philosophy , 2003 .
[71] J. Wolff. Observability, Visualizability and the Question of Metaphysical Neutrality , 2015 .
[72] S. Bruce. Discrete Time and Intrinsic Length in Quantum Mechanics , 2003 .
[73] R. Kastner. The Born Rule and Free Will: why Libertarian Agent-Causal Free Will is not "antiscientific" , 2016 .
[74] QUANTUM MECHANICS EXPLAINED , 2006, quant-ph/0607005.
[75] A. Khrennikov. Towards a Resolution of Dilemma: Nonlocality or Nonobjectivity? , 2012 .
[76] Andrei Khrennikov,et al. Bell argument: Locality or realism? Time to make the choice , 2011, 1108.0001.
[77] S. Wehner,et al. Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres , 2015, Nature.
[78] B. Englert,et al. Complementarity and uncertainty , 1995, Nature.
[79] Jochen Kluve. On the Role of Counterfactuals in Inferring Causal Effects , 2001 .
[80] Richard D. Gill,et al. Appendix to "Accardi contra Bell (cum mundi) : The Impossible Coupling" , 2001, quant-ph/0110137.
[81] Tim Maudlin,et al. Ontological Clarity via Canonical Presentation: Electromagnetism and the Aharonov–Bohm Effect , 2018, Entropy.
[82] J. Saatsi. Scientific Realism Meets Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics , 2017, Synthese Library.
[83] G. Belot. Quantum states for primitive ontologists , 2012 .
[84] J. Sprenger. The objectivity of Subjective Bayesianism , 2018 .
[85] J. Hartle. Quantum physics and human language , 2006, The Quantum Universe.
[86] Kevin Vanslette. Entropic dynamics: a hybrid-contextual model of quantum mechanics , 2017, Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations.
[87] L. Smolin,et al. Quantum theory from quantum gravity , 2003, gr-qc/0311059.
[88] Roger Colbeck,et al. The Completeness of Quantum Theory for Predicting Measurement Outcomes , 2016 .
[89] H. Briegel,et al. A Stochastic Process Model for Free Agency under Indeterminism , 2018, Dialectica.
[90] Michael Esfeld,et al. Observables and Unobservables in Quantum Mechanics: How the No-Hidden-Variables Theorems Support the Bohmian Particle Ontology , 2018, Entropy.
[91] Realism and Understanding , 2003 .
[92] Kevin H. Knuth,et al. Quantum Theory and Probability Theory: Their Relationship and Origin in Symmetry , 2011, Symmetry.
[93] D. Wallace. On the Plurality of Quantum Theories: Quantum Theory as a Framework, and its Implications for the Quantum Measurement Problem , 2018 .
[94] R. N. Schouten,et al. Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km , 2015, 1508.05949.
[95] T. Bigaj. Are field quanta real objects? Some remarks on the ontology of quantum field theory , 2017 .
[96] Elizabeth Miller. Quantum Entanglement, Bohmian Mechanics, and Humean Supervenience , 2014 .
[97] P. Busch. The Time-Energy Uncertainty Relation , 2002 .
[98] Allen Stairs. Quantum Logic, Realism, and Value Definiteness , 1983, Philosophy of Science.
[99] J. Munkhammar. Canonical Relational Quantum Mechanics from Information Theory , 2011, 1101.1417.
[100] Maximilian Schlosshauer,et al. Implications of the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph quantum no-go theorem. , 2012, Physical review letters.
[101] A. Budiyono. Quantum Dynamics and Kinematics from a Statistical Model Selected by the Principle of Locality , 2013, 1301.5345.
[102] Richard Healey,et al. A pragmatist view of the metaphysics of entanglement , 2020, Synthese.
[103] Raffael Krismer,et al. Representation Lost: The Case for a Relational Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2018, Entropy.
[104] N. David Mermin. What Do These Correlations Know about Reality? Nonlocality and the Absurd , 1998 .
[105] Louis Marchildon,et al. Why Should We Interpret Quantum Mechanics? , 2004 .
[106] M. Esfeld,et al. On the Importance of Interpretation in Quantum Physics: A Reply to Elise Crull , 2015, 1504.02642.
[107] R. Werner,et al. Colloquium: Quantum root-mean-square error and measurement uncertainty relations , 2013, 1312.4393.
[108] Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al. Contextuality Analysis of the Double Slit Experiment (with a Glimpse into Three Slits) , 2018, Entropy.
[109] M. Kiran,et al. Interfering Quantum Trajectories Without Which-Way Information , 2017 .
[110] Paul Teller,et al. Particles, particle labels, and quanta: The toll of unacknowledged metaphysics , 1991 .
[111] Adán Cabello,et al. HOW MANY QUESTIONS DO YOU NEED TO PROVE THAT UNASKED QUESTIONS HAVE NO ANSWERS , 2006 .
[112] Darrell P. Rowbottom,et al. Scientific realism: what it is, the contemporary debate, and new directions , 2017, Synthese.
[113] L. Di'osi. How to teach and think about spontaneous wave function collapse theories: not like before , 2017, 1710.02814.
[114] Nikola Burić,et al. Relations Between Different Notions of Degrees of Freedom of a Quantum System and Its Classical Model , 2014, 1411.4425.
[115] F. Zalamea. The Mathematical Description of a Generic Physical System , 2015 .
[116] M. Esfeld,et al. Relationalism about mechanics based on a minimalist ontology of matter , 2016, European Journal for Philosophy of Science.
[117] M. Redhead. Incompleteness, nonlocality, and realism , 1987 .
[118] Armen E. Allahverdyan,et al. Understanding quantum measurement from the solution of dynamical models , 2011, 1107.2138.
[119] A. Mitra,et al. On The Foundations Of Quantum Theory , 2005 .
[120] Albert Solé-Ribalta,et al. Introduction: space–time and the wave function , 2015, Synthese.
[121] Basil J. Hiley,et al. From the Heisenberg Picture to Bohm: a New Perspective on Active Information and its relation to Shannon Information. , 2002 .
[122] G. Jaeger,et al. Entanglement, Information, and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2010 .
[123] C. Antonopoulos. Making the Quantum of Relevance , 2005 .
[124] Diederik Aerts,et al. The Violation of Bell Inequalities in the Macroworld , 2000, quant-ph/0007044.
[125] David Wallace,et al. Lessons from realistic physics for the metaphysics of quantum theory , 2020, Synthese.
[126] M. Kupczynski. Quantum mechanics and modeling of physical reality , 2018, Physica Scripta.
[127] GianCarlo Ghirardi,et al. Dynamical reduction models , 2003 .
[128] Mauro Dorato,et al. GRW as an ontology of dispositions , 2010 .
[129] P. Dirac. Principles of Quantum Mechanics , 1982 .
[130] Tuomas K. Pernu,et al. Supervenient Freedom and the Free Will Deadlock , 2017 .
[131] Chris Heunen,et al. The Many Classical Faces of Quantum Structures , 2014, Entropy.
[132] J. Bub. Quantum Correlations and the Measurement Problem , 2012, 1210.6371.
[133] Mordecai Waegell,et al. An Ontology of Nature with Local Causality, Parallel Lives, and Many Relative Worlds , 2017, Foundations of Physics.
[134] M. Egg. Delayed-Choice Experiments and the Metaphysics of Entanglement , 2013, Foundations of Physics.
[135] N. Mermin. Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell , 1993, 1802.10119.
[136] J. Berkovitz. The Propensity Interpretation of Probability: A Re-evaluation , 2015 .
[137] Danko D. Georgiev,et al. Probing finite coarse-grained virtual Feynman histories with sequential weak values , 2017, 1709.08479.
[139] Federico Laudisa. Counterfactual Reasoning, Realism and Quantum Mechanics: Much Ado About Nothing? , 2017, 1705.08287.
[140] O. Lombardi,et al. Self-induced decoherence: a new approach , 2004 .
[141] David Marcus Appleby,et al. Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner , 2016, Entropy.
[142] Mark Balaguer,et al. Why there are no good arguments for any interesting version of determinism , 2009, Synthese.
[143] D. Gillies. Philosophical Theories of Probability , 2000 .
[144] H. Primas. Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism , 1981 .
[145] Mario Hubert,et al. The wave-function as a multi-field , 2017, 1710.03260.
[146] D. Krause. Do `classical' space and time provide identity to quantum particles? , 2017 .
[147] Rafael D. Sorkin. Quantum dynamics without the wavefunction , 2006 .
[148] Itamar Pitowsky. Quantum Mechanics as a Theory of Probability , 2006 .
[149] Roman Frigg,et al. Probability in GRW Theory , 2007 .
[150] D. Krause,et al. Ontological Issues in Quantum Theory , 2010 .
[151] Elizabeth Miller,et al. Two notions of holism , 2020, Synthese.
[152] Surrealistic Bohmian trajectories appraised , 2017 .
[153] The Direction of Time: From the Global Arrow to the Local Arrow , 2003, quant-ph/0301002.
[154] Gerhard Grössing,et al. Vacuum Landscaping: Cause of Nonlocal Influences without Signaling , 2018, Entropy.
[155] Dennis Dieks,et al. Von Neumann's Impossibility Proof: Mathematics in the Service of Rhetorics , 2017, 1801.09305.
[156] R. Spekkens,et al. Quantum from principles , 2012, ArXiv.
[157] Laura Ruetsche. The Shaky Game +25, or: on locavoracity , 2014, Synthese.
[158] 'Einselection' of Pointer Observables: The New H-Theorem? , 2014, 1406.4126.
[159] Dennis Dieks. Probability in modal interpretations of quantum mechanics , 2007 .
[160] R. Spekkens,et al. Quantum common causes and quantum causal models , 2016, 1609.09487.
[161] C. Fuchs. QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism , 2010, 1003.5209.
[162] Lev Vaidman,et al. Quantum theory and determinism , 2014, 1405.4222.
[163] K. Knuth. Understanding the Electron , 2015, 1511.07766.
[164] Paul M. Näger. The causal problem of entanglement , 2015, Synthese.
[165] Jaroslaw Pykacz,et al. Can Many-Valued Logic Help to Comprehend Quantum Phenomena? , 2014, 1408.2697.
[166] Emily Adlam,et al. Quantum Mechanics and Global Determinism , 2018, Quanta.
[167] I. Pitowsky,et al. Betting on the Outcomes of Measurements: A Bayesian Theory of Quantum Probability , 2002, quant-ph/0208121.
[168] Jan Walleczek,et al. Agent Inaccessibility as a Fundamental Principle in Quantum Mechanics: Objective Unpredictability and Formal Uncomputability , 2018, Entropy.
[169] Alisa Bokulich,et al. Losing Sight of the Forest for the Ψ: Beyond the Wavefunction Hegemony , 2019 .
[170] Alyssa Ney. Fundamental physical ontologies and the constraint of empirical coherence: a defense of wave function realism , 2014, Synthese.
[171] Alexey V. Melkikh,et al. Nonlinearity of Quantum Mechanics and Solution of the Problem of Wave Function Collapse , 2015 .
[172] O. Stoica. On the Wavefunction Collapse , 2016, 1601.02598.
[173] C. Fuchs. Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more) , 2002, quant-ph/0205039.
[174] K. Mathew,et al. Interfering Quantum Trajectories Without Which-Way Information , 2018, 1806.00603.
[175] Elise M. Crull,et al. Less Interpretation and More Decoherence in Quantum Gravity and Inflationary Cosmology , 2015 .
[176] Nicolas Gisin,et al. Why Bohmian Mechanics? One- and Two-Time Position Measurements, Bell Inequalities, Philosophy, and Physics , 2015, Entropy.
[177] S. Rashkovskiy. Quantum mechanics without quanta: the nature of the wave–particle duality of light , 2015, 1507.02113.
[178] Samir Okasha,et al. Philosophical Theories of Probability , 2002 .
[179] Michael Esfeld,et al. Primitive ontology and quantum state in the GRW matter density theory , 2014, Synthese.
[180] Mathias Frisch. No place for causes? Causal skepticism in physics , 2012 .
[181] T. Nieuwenhuizen,et al. Simultaneous measurement of two noncommuting quantum variables : Solution of a dynamical model , 2016, 1611.07937.
[182] D. Ellerman. Why delayed choice experiments do Not imply retrocausality , 2015 .
[183] Wojciech H. Zurek,et al. Objective past of a quantum universe: Redundant records of consistent histories , 2013, 1312.0331.
[184] Dugald Murdoch,et al. The Philosophical Writings , 1986 .
[185] L. Felline. Quantum theory is not only about information , 2018, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.
[186] N. Mermin,et al. Homer Nodded: Von Neumann’s Surprising Oversight , 2018, Foundations of Physics.
[187] Stuart Kauffman,et al. Taking Heisenberg’s Potentia Seriously , 2019, Adventures in Quantumland.
[188] Nonlocal Position Changes of a Photon Revealed by Quantum Routers , 2017, Scientific reports.
[189] Carlos Baladrón. Elements for the Development of a Darwinian Scheme Leading to Quantum Mechanics , 2015 .
[190] Katherine Robertson. Can the two-time interpretation of quantum mechanics solve the measurement problem? , 2017 .
[191] Tim N. Palmer,et al. Experimental Non-Violation of the Bell Inequality , 2017, Entropy.
[192] Farhad Taher Ghahramani,et al. On the meaning of locality: the overlapping assumptions , 2015, 1509.03301.
[193] R. Srinivasan. LOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BOHR COMPLEMENTARITY PRINCIPLE IN AFSHAR'S EXPERIMENT UNDER THE NAFL INTERPRETATION , 2005, quant-ph/0504115.
[194] V. Allori. Primitive Ontology in a Nutshell , 2015 .
[195] Nicolas Gisin,et al. Are There Quantum Effects Coming from Outside Space-time? Nonlocality, free will and , 2010, 1011.3440.
[196] About the Confusion Between the Course of Time and the Arrow of Time , 2007 .
[197] Stefaan E. Cuypers,et al. Determinism and the Paradox of Predictability , 2010 .
[198] R. Haag. Quantum Physics and Reality , 2001 .
[199] Lev Vaidman,et al. Position measurements in the de Broglie–Bohm interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2012, 1207.0793.
[200] V. Allori. Scientific Realism and Primitive Ontology Or: The Pessimistic Induction and the Nature of the Wave Function , 2018, Lato Sensu: Revue de la Société de philosophie des sciences.
[201] Porter Williams,et al. Scientific Realism Made Effective , 2019, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[202] James T. Cushing,et al. Philosophical concepts in physics , 1998 .
[203] R. Griffiths. What quantum measurements measure , 2017, 1704.08725.
[204] M. Strien. The Norton Dome and the Nineteenth Century Foundations of Determinism , 2014 .
[205] Finding your marbles in wavefunction collapse theories , 2003 .
[206] C. Unnikrishnan. The incompatibility between local hidden variable theories and the fundamental conservation laws , 2005 .
[207] Kelvin J. McQueen,et al. In defence of the self-location uncertainty account of probability in the many-worlds interpretation , 2019, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.
[208] Are Causal Laws a Relic of Bygone Age? , 2017 .
[209] F. Birman. Quantum Mechanics and the Plight of Physicalism , 2009 .
[210] Andrei Khrennikov,et al. CHSH Inequality: Quantum Probabilities as Classical Conditional Probabilities , 2014, 1406.4886.
[211] Y. Aharonov,et al. Measurement and collapse within the two-state vector formalism , 2014, 1406.6382.
[212] Jean-Pierre Gazeau,et al. From Classical to Quantum Models: The Regularising Rôle of Integrals, Symmetry and Probabilities , 2018, Foundations of Physics.
[213] A. Elitzur,et al. The Too-Late-Choice Experiment: Bell's Proof within a Setting Where the Nonlocal Effect's Target Is an Earlier Event , 2015, 1512.08275.
[214] Robert B. Griffiths,et al. Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics , 1984 .
[215] William Seager,et al. The Philosophical and Scientific Metaphysics of David Bohm , 2018, Entropy.
[216] C. Isham,et al. Classical and quantum probabilities as truth values , 2011, 1102.2213.
[217] H. W. de Regt,et al. Understanding Scientific Understanding , 2017 .
[218] Peter J. Lewis. Holism and Time Symmetry , 2016 .
[219] S. Polyakov,et al. Experimental Bounds on Classical Random Field Theories , 2014, Foundations of Physics.
[220] Richard D. Gill,et al. Statistics, causality and Bell's theorem , 2012, 1207.5103.
[221] Guido Bacciagaluppi,et al. Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference , 2009 .
[222] O. Lombardi,et al. A new application of the modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics: the problem of optical isomerism , 2017 .
[223] Claus Beisbart,et al. What Is Understanding? An Overview of Recent Debates in Epistemology and Philosophy of Science , 2017 .
[224] Karl Svozil,et al. New Forms of Quantum Value Indefiniteness Suggest That Incompatible Views on Contexts Are Epistemic , 2018, Entropy.
[225] Giulio Chiribella,et al. Quantum from Principles , 2016 .
[226] M. S. Leifer,et al. Is the Quantum State Real? An Extended Review of -ontology Theorems , 2014, 1409.1570.
[227] T. Bilban. Realism and Antirealism in Informational Foundations of Quantum Theory , 2014 .
[228] N. Belnap,et al. Branching with Uncertain Semantics , 2010, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[229] T. Maudlin. Three measurement problems , 1995 .
[230] Lon Becker. That von Neumann Did Not Believe in a Physical Collapse , 2004, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[231] Christian de Ronde,et al. The Logos Categorical Approach to Quantum Mechanics: I. Kochen-Specker Contextuality and Global Intensive Valuations , 2018, International Journal of Theoretical Physics.
[232] J. Bouwel,et al. Forms of Causal Explanation , 2005 .
[233] C. Garola. An Epistemic Interpretation of Quantum Probability via Contextuality , 2018, Foundations of Science.
[234] W. Pietsch,et al. What Is and Why Do We Need Philosophy of Physics? , 2012 .
[235] A. Messiah. Quantum Mechanics , 1961 .
[236] Emily Adlam,et al. The problem of confirmation in the Everett interpretation , 2014, 1504.01063.
[237] Richard Healey,et al. Quantum Theory: A Pragmatist Approach , 2010, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[238] A. Kent. Beable-guided quantum theories: Generalizing quantum probability laws , 2012, 1204.5961.
[239] Andr'e L. G. Mandolesi. Analysis of Wallace’s Proof of the Born Rule in Everettian Quantum Mechanics: Formal Aspects , 2015 .
[240] Peter J. Lewis. Conspiracy Theories of Quantum Mechanics , 2006, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[241] Don Howard. What Is Complementarity , 2013 .
[242] S. Pinna. The philosophy of quantum gravity – lessons from Nicolai Hartmann , 2015 .
[243] W. James. Pragmatism, A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking: Together With Four Related Essays Selected From The Meaning of Truth , 2010 .
[244] Robert Flack,et al. Feynman Paths and Weak Values , 2018, Entropy.
[245] Olimpia Lombardi,et al. A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2006, quant-ph/0610121.
[246] A. Macdonald. Entanglement, Joint Measurement, and State Reduction , 2001, quant-ph/0108129.
[247] Nicolas Gisin,et al. Indeterminism in Physics, Classical Chaos and Bohmian Mechanics: Are Real Numbers Really Real? , 2018, Erkenntnis.
[248] Lucien Hardy,et al. ARE QUANTUM STATES REAL , 2012, 1205.1439.
[249] C. Werndl. What Are the New Implications of Chaos for Unpredictability? , 2009, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[250] Gregg S. Jaeger,et al. Are Virtual Particles Less Real? , 2019, Entropy.
[251] Thomas Pashby,et al. Time and Quantum Theory: A History and A Prospectus , 2015 .
[252] Time, classical and quantum , 2016, 1605.03534.
[253] Abner Shimony,et al. The logic of quantum mechanics , 1981 .
[254] Matthew F Pusey,et al. On the reality of the quantum state , 2011, Nature Physics.
[255] Paul Teller,et al. Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View , 1991 .
[256] R. Healey. Pragmatist Quantum Realism , 2018, Scientific Realism and the Quantum.
[257] Tomasz Bigaj,et al. On quantum entanglement, counterfactuals, causality and dispositions , 2020, Synthese.
[258] Christopher G. Timpson,et al. Quantum Bayesianism: A study , 2008, 0804.2047.
[259] Vasudeva Jijnasu. The uncertainty principle – A simplified review of the four versions , 2016 .
[260] A Non‐Intuitionist’s Approach To The Interpretation Problem Of Quantum Mechanics , 2005 .
[261] Philipp Berghofer. Ontic structural realism and quantum field theory: Are there intrinsic properties at the most fundamental level of reality? , 2017 .
[262] Slobodan Perović. Emergence of complementarity and the Baconian roots of Niels Bohr's method , 2013 .
[263] Cristian S. Calude,et al. A variant of the Kochen-Specker theorem localising value indefiniteness , 2015, 1503.01985.
[264] W. Myrvold. Ontology for Collapse Theories , 2017 .
[265] Sue Sulcs,et al. The Nature of Light and Twentieth Century Experimental Physics , 2003 .
[266] C. Rovelli,et al. Relational Quantum Mechanics , 2006 .
[267] D. Wallace. The Quantum Revolution in Philosophy , 2020, Analysis.
[268] I. Pitowsky. Resolution of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen and Bell Paradoxes , 1982 .
[269] T. Philbin. Derivation of quantum probabilities from deterministic evolution , 2014, 1409.7891.
[270] Olimpia Lombardi,et al. Histories in quantum mechanics: distinguishing between formalism and interpretation , 2018 .
[271] Ken B. Wharton,et al. A New Class of Retrocausal Models , 2018, Entropy.
[272] Ruth E. Kastner,et al. The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2012 .
[273] Dipankar Home,et al. Conceptual Foundations Of Quantum Physics , 1997 .
[274] Maximilian Schlosshauer-Selbach. Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition , 2008 .
[275] Deficiencies of Bohmian Trajectories in View of Basic Quantum Principles , 2014 .
[276] W. Schwarz. No Interpretation of Probability , 2018 .
[277] Marian Kupczynski. Bell Inequalities, Experimental Protocols and Contextuality , 2014 .
[278] Kelvin J. McQueen. Four Tails Problems for Dynamical Collapse Theories , 2015, 1501.05778.
[279] André L. G. Mandolesi. Analysis of Wallace’s Proof of the Born Rule in Everettian Quantum Mechanics II: Concepts and Axioms , 2018, Foundations of Physics.
[280] A. Jordan,et al. Colloquium : Understanding quantum weak values: Basics and applications , 2013, 1305.7154.
[281] L. Ballentine. Classicality without Decoherence: A Reply to Schlosshauer , 2008 .
[282] Andrei Khrennikov,et al. Reality Without Realism: On the Ontological and Epistemological Architecture of Quantum Mechanics , 2015 .
[283] Relational Interpretation of the Wave Function and a Possible Way Around Bell’s Theorem , 2006, quant-ph/0602060.
[284] From Wave-Particle to Features-Event Complementarity , 2011 .
[285] T. Maudlin. Remarks on the passing of time , 2002 .
[286] H. Elze. Ontological states and dynamics of discrete (pre-)quantum systems , 2017, 1711.00324.
[287] David Jennings,et al. Distinct quantum states can be compatible with a single state of reality. , 2012, Physical review letters.
[288] J. Bain. CPT Invariance, the Spin-Statistics Connection, and the Ontology of Relativistic Quantum Field Theories , 2013 .
[289] Michael Silberstein,et al. Why the Tsirelson Bound? Bub’s Question and Fuchs’ Desideratum , 2018, Entropy.
[290] J. Ladyman,et al. Entanglement and non-factorizability , 2013 .
[291] O. Bueno. Constructive empiricism, partial structures and the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2014 .
[292] Gerard 't Hooft,et al. On the free-will postulate in Quantum Mechanics , 2007 .
[293] S. Boughn,et al. Making Sense of Bell’s Theorem and Quantum Nonlocality , 2017, 1703.11003.
[294] T. P. Singh. Testing the limits of quantum mechanics. , 2018, 1810.00167.
[295] D. Krause. Does Newtonian Space Provide Identity to Quantum Systems? , 2017, Foundations of Science.
[296] P. Busch,et al. Symmetry, Reference Frames, and Relational Quantities in Quantum Mechanics , 2017, 1703.10434.
[297] A. Eagle. Twenty-One Arguments against Propensity Analyses of Probability , 2004 .
[298] Stathis Psillos,et al. Scientific realism: quo vadis? Introduction: new thinking about scientific realism , 2017, Synthese.
[299] W. Philipp,et al. Bell's theorem and the problem of decidability between the views of Einstein and Bohr , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[300] Louis Marchildon. Remarks on Mohrhoff's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2004 .
[301] P. Busch,et al. Direct tests of measurement uncertainty relations: what it takes. , 2014, Physical review letters.
[302] Peter J. Lewis,et al. On the Status of Primitive Ontology , 2017 .
[303] Diederik Aerts,et al. Quantum Particles as Conceptual Entities: A Possible Explanatory Framework for Quantum Theory , 2009, 1004.2530.
[304] D. Brody,et al. Quantum State Reduction , 2016, 1611.02664.
[305] M. Kupczynski. Entanglement and quantum nonlocality demystified , 2012, 1205.4636.
[306] D. Sudarsky,et al. Less Decoherence and More Coherence in Quantum Gravity, Inflationary Cosmology and Elsewhere , 2015, 1512.05298.
[307] T. Maudlin. The Universal and the Local in Quantum Theory , 2015, Synthese Library.
[308] Andrea Oldofredi,et al. Particle Creation and Annihilation: Two Bohmian Approaches , 2018, Lato Sensu: Revue de la Société de philosophie des sciences.
[309] Kristian Camilleri. Bohr, Heisenberg and the divergent views of complementarity , 2007 .
[310] Richard Corry. Retrocausal models for EPR , 2015 .
[311] E. Knill,et al. A strong loophole-free test of local realism , 2015, 2016 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).
[312] Christian de Ronde,et al. Quantum Superpositions and the Representation of Physical Reality Beyond Measurement Outcomes and Mathematical Structures , 2016, 1603.06112.
[313] The Wave Function and Quantum Reality , 2011, 1108.1187.
[314] Vojtěch Havlíček,et al. A ‘problem of time’ in the multiplicative scheme for the n-site hopper , 2017, 1706.03793.
[315] T. Qureshi,et al. Einstein's Recoiling Slit Experiment, Complementarity and Uncertainty , 2012, 1210.4248.
[316] E. Davies. Some Remarks on the Foundations of Quantum Theory , 2005, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[317] Giovanni Valente. Restoring particle phenomenology , 2015 .
[318] Howard Barnum,et al. Post-Classical Probability Theory , 2012, 1205.3833.
[319] Elise Crull. Yes, More Decoherence: A Reply to Critics , 2017 .
[320] About a “Contextuality Loophole” in Bell’s Theorem Claimed to Exist by Nieuwenhuizen , 2016, 1610.09642.
[321] Peter W. Evans,et al. Retrocausality at no extra cost , 2014, Synthese.
[322] Foad Dizadji-Bahmani. The Probability Problem in Everettian Quantum Mechanics Persists , 2015, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[323] O. Lévêque,et al. Classical and Quantum Probability in the ∈-Model , 1999 .
[324] H. Wiseman. Quantum discord is Bohr’s notion of non-mechanical disturbance introduced to counter the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen argument , 2012, 1208.4964.
[325] Karl Hess,et al. Breakdown of Bell's theorem for certain objective local parameter spaces , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[326] A. Rizzi. Does the PBR Theorem Rule out a Statistical Understanding of QM? , 2018, Foundations of Physics.
[327] Louis Marchildon,et al. Multiplicity in Everett's interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2015, 1504.04835.
[328] Alexia Auffèves,et al. Contexts, Systems and Modalities: A New Ontology for Quantum Mechanics , 2014, 1409.2120.
[329] V. Allori. Quantum Mechanics and Paradigm Shifts , 2015 .
[330] Armen E. Allahverdyan,et al. 72 57 v 1 [ qu an tph ] 2 8 M ar 2 01 3 Statistical theory of ideal quantum measurement processes , 2014 .
[331] Karl Hess,et al. A possible loophole in the theorem of Bell , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[332] R. Hermens. The problem of contextuality and the impossibility of experimental metaphysics thereof , 2010, 1012.3052.
[333] C. Garola. Interpreting Quantum Logic as a Pragmatic Structure , 2017 .
[334] Robert B. Griffiths,et al. The New Quantum Logic , 2013, 1311.2619.
[335] T. Nieuwenhuizen. A subquantum arrow of time , 2014, 1409.3131.
[336] Nonlinear Schrödinger equation and classical-field description of thermal radiation , 2018, 1802.01979.
[337] Lev Vaidman,et al. When Photons Are Lying about Where They Have Been , 2018, Entropy.
[338] O. Lombardi,et al. The role of symmetry in the interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2016, 1602.07160.
[339] Emilio Santos,et al. Towards a Realistic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Providing a Model of the Physical World , 2012, 1203.5688.
[340] Benjamin C. Jantzen. Entities Without Identity: A Semantical Dilemma , 2019 .
[341] J. Vaccaro. The quantum theory of time, the block universe, and human experience , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[342] J. Bell,et al. Schrödinger: Are there quantum jumps? , 1987 .
[343] James D. Fraser,et al. The Real Problem with Perturbative Quantum Field Theory , 2017, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[344] Craig Callender,et al. One world, one beable , 2014, Synthese.
[345] N. Kampen,et al. Ten theorems about quantum mechanical measurements , 1988 .
[346] T. P. Singh,et al. Nonlinear quantum mechanics, the superposition principle, and the quantum measurement problem , 2009, 0912.2845.
[347] Mauro Dorato. Events and the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics , 2015 .
[348] P. Stamp. Environmental decoherence versus intrinsic decoherence , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[349] A. Ney. Ontological Reduction and the Wave Function Ontology , 2013 .
[350] Jon Williamson,et al. Why Frequentists and Bayesians Need Each Other , 2013 .
[351] J. Barrett. Everett’s pure wave mechanics and the notion of worlds , 2011 .
[352] S. Friederich. In defence of non-ontic accounts of quantum states , 2012, 1204.6738.
[353] Michael Esfeld,et al. Bell’s Theorem and the Issue of Determinism and Indeterminism , 2015 .
[354] C. Thron,et al. A SIGNAL-PROCESSING INTERPRETATION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS , 2013 .
[355] R. Tumulka,et al. Epistemology of Wave Function Collapse in Quantum Physics , 2013, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[356] Curtis Forbes,et al. A pragmatic, existentialist approach to the scientific realism debate , 2016, Synthese.
[357] P. N. Kaloyerou. Critique of Quantum Optical Experimental Refutations of Bohr’s Principle of Complementarity, of the Wootters–Zurek Principle of Complementarity, and of the Particle–Wave Duality Relation , 2014, 1408.4061.
[358] Roderich Tumulka,et al. What Is Bohmian Mechanics , 2001, Compendium of Quantum Physics.
[359] D. M. Appleby. Facts, Values and Quanta , 2005 .
[360] J. Maziero. A relação de incerteza de Maccone-Pati , 2017, 1705.09139.
[361] Sheldon Goldstein,et al. Reality and the Role of the Wavefunction in Quantum Theory , 2011, 1101.4575.
[363] S. Weiss. Conceptual Foundations Of Quantum Mechanics , 2016 .
[364] E. Richard Cohen,et al. Foundations of Quantum Theory , 1955 .
[365] Federico Laudisa,et al. Against the ‘no-go’ philosophy of quantum mechanics , 2014 .
[366] F. Strocchi. The physical principles of quantum mechanics. A critical review , 2011, 1112.1507.
[367] Andreas Doering,et al. “What is a Thing?”: Topos Theory in the Foundations of Physics , 2008, 0803.0417.
[368] Andrei Khrennikov,et al. Quantum epistemology from subquantum ontology: quantum mechanics from theory of classical random fields , 2016, 1605.05907.
[369] Karl Hess. Einstein Was Right , 2014 .
[370] D. M. Appleby. The Bell–Kochen–Specker theorem , 2003, quant-ph/0308114.
[371] J. Boisvert,et al. Absorbers in the Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2012, 1207.5230.
[372] A. Sudbery. John Bell and the Great Enterprise , 2018, Quanta.
[373] Oliver Passon. On a Common Misconception Regarding the de Broglie–Bohm Theory , 2018, Entropy.
[374] Decio Krause,et al. Logical Aspects of Quantum (Non-)Individuality , 2008, 0812.1404.
[375] E. Schrödinger. Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems , 1935, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[376] R. Healey. Quantum Theory: Realism or Pragmatism? , 2018, Análisis. Revista de investigación filosófica.
[377] G. Hooft. Relating the quantum mechanics of discrete systems to standard canonical quantum mechanics , 2012, 1204.4926.
[378] Nicolas Gisin,et al. Collapse. What else , 2017, 1701.08300.
[379] Matthew F Pusey,et al. Can a quantum state over time resemble a quantum state at a single time? , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[380] Robert W. Spekkens,et al. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , 2007 .
[381] Andrea Oldofredi,et al. No-Go Theorems and the Foundations of Quantum Physics , 2018, 1904.10991.
[382] Leslie E Ballentine,et al. Propensity, Probability, and Quantum Theory , 2016 .
[383] J. Henson. Non-separability Does Not Relieve the Problem of Bell’s Theorem , 2013, 1302.7188.
[384] Richard Johns. Epistemic theories of objective chance , 2018, Synthese.
[385] Asher Peres. What's Wrong with These Observables? , 2002 .
[386] Lukasz Rudnicki,et al. Uncertainty Relations for Coarse–Grained Measurements: An Overview , 2018, Entropy.
[387] B. Mielnik. Generalized quantum mechanics , 1974 .
[388] J. Neumann. Mathematische grundlagen der Quantenmechanik , 1935 .
[389] Federico Holik,et al. Contextuality and Indistinguishability , 2017, Entropy.
[390] R. Hermens. An Instrumentalists Approach Towards Quantum Logic , 2011 .
[391] T. Bilban. Husserl’s Reconsideration of the Observation Process and Its Possible Connections with Quantum Mechanics: Supplementation of Informational Foundations of Quantum Theory , 2013 .
[392] Hans Halvorson,et al. Are Rindler Quanta Real? Inequivalent Particle Concepts in Quantum Field Theory , 2000, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[393] A. S. Sanz,et al. Bohm’s approach to quantum mechanics: Alternative theory or practical picture? , 2017, Frontiers of Physics.
[394] R. Rosa. The Merli–Missiroli–Pozzi Two-Slit Electron-Interference Experiment , 2012, Physics in perspective.
[395] Christopher Ferrie,et al. Why protective measurement does not establish the reality of the quantum state , 2015, 1509.08893.
[396] T. Maudlin. Completeness, supervenience and ontology , 2007 .
[397] Gerard 't Hooft,et al. The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2014, 1405.1548.
[398] G. N. Fleming. Response to Dr. Pashby: Time operators and POVM observables in quantum mechanics☆ , 2015 .
[399] A. Fine. Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell Inequalities , 1982 .
[400] Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al. A Qualified Kolmogorovian Account of Probabilistic Contextuality , 2013, QI.
[401] Johannes Kofler,et al. Delayed-choice gedanken experiments and their realizations , 2014, 1407.2930.
[402] E. Schrödinger. Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.
[403] Matteo Morganti,et al. Interpreting Quantum Entanglement: Steps towards Coherentist Quantum Mechanics , 2020, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[404] J. Barrett. The distribution postulate in Bohm's theory , 1995 .
[405] Jaakko Kuorikoski,et al. External representations and scientific understanding , 2014, Synthese.
[406] A. Bracken,et al. Waiting for the quantum bus: the flow of negative probability , 2014 .
[407] D. Dieks. Space and Time in Particle and Field Physics , 2001 .
[408] A. Grinbaum. How device-independent approaches change the meaning of physical theory , 2015, 1512.01035.
[409] H. Nikolić. Quantum Mechanics: Myths and Facts , 2006, quant-ph/0609163.
[410] Harald Atmanspacher,et al. Epistemic and Ontic Quantum Realities , 2003 .
[411] C. Norris. Quantum Nonlocality and the Challenge to Scientific Realism , 2000 .
[412] N. D. Hari Dass,et al. Ontology and Quantum Mechanics , 2014, 1406.4933.
[413] D. Wallace. Decoherence and its role in the modern measurement problem , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[414] Joshua Rosaler. Interpretation neutrality in the classical domain of quantum theory , 2015, 1511.06383.
[415] K. Knuth. Information-based physics: an observer-centric foundation , 2013, 1310.1667.
[416] Albert Einstein,et al. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .
[417] D. J. Baker,et al. Against Field Interpretations of Quantum Field Theory , 2009, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[418] N. Maxwell. Could Inelastic Interactions Induce Quantum Probabilistic Transitions , 2018, 1806.00622.
[419] Caslav Brukner,et al. Information and Fundamental Elements of the Structure of Quantum Theory , 2002, quant-ph/0212084.
[420] K. Svozil. Unscrambling the Quantum Omelette , 2012, 1206.6024.
[421] J. Cramer. The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Nonlocality , 2015, 1503.00039.
[422] Louis Vervoort. Are Hidden-Variable Theories for Pilot-Wave Systems Possible? , 2018, Foundations of Physics.
[423] Raffaele Romano,et al. Is a description deeper than the quantum one possible? , 2014, 1501.04127.
[424] J. Bell. On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox , 1964 .
[425] R. Maleeh. Bohr’s Philosophy in the Light of Peircean Pragmatism , 2015 .
[426] C. Moyer. Time in Quantum Mechanics , 2013, 1305.5525.
[427] Richard Dawid,et al. Many worlds: decoherent or incoherent? , 2015, Synthese.
[428] W. D. Muynck. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, an Empiricist Approach , 2002 .
[429] P. Huneman,et al. On Probabilities in Biology and Physics , 2015 .
[430] T. Shomar. Bohr as a Phenomenological Realist , 2008 .
[431] R. Dick. Quantum jumps, superpositions, and the continuous evolution of quantum states , 2017, 1703.06230.
[432] Henk W. De Regt,et al. Scientific understanding: truth or dare? , 2014, Synthese.
[433] O. Lombardi,et al. Partial Traces in Decoherence and in Interpretation: What Do Reduced States Refer to? , 2014, 1404.3264.
[434] Peter J. Lewis. In search of local beables , 2015 .
[435] C. Wetterich. Quantum mechanics from classical statistics , 2009, 0906.4919.
[436] M. Kupczynski. Quantum mechanics and modelling of physical reality . , 2018 .
[437] C. Ronde. Representational Realism, Closed Theories and the Quantum to Classical Limit , 2016, 1602.05405.
[438] Basil J. Hiley,et al. Quantum Trajectories: Real or Surreal? , 2018, Entropy.
[439] H. Quevedo,et al. Self-accelerated Universe Induced by Repulsive Effects as an Alternative to Dark Energy and Modified Gravities , 2015, 1507.06446.
[440] Armond Duwell,et al. Understanding quantum phenomena and quantum theories , 2018 .
[441] M. Trassinelli. Relational Quantum Mechanics and Probability , 2018, Foundations of Physics.
[442] Probability and Relative Frequency , 2016 .
[443] B. Cour. A Locally Deterministic, Detector-Based Model of Quantum Measurement , 2014, 2104.12801.
[444] J. Rau. On quantum vs. classical probability , 2007, 0710.2119.
[445] G. Ghirardi,et al. On the completeness of quantum mechanics and the interpretation of the state vector , 2013, 1302.6278.
[446] Andrei Khrennikov. Towards a Field Model of Prequantum Reality , 2012 .
[447] Marissa Giustina,et al. Bell-inequality violation with entangled photons, free of the coincidence-time loophole , 2013, 1309.0712.
[448] Travis Norsen,et al. Can the wave function in configuration space be replaced by single-particle wave functions in physical space? , 2014, Synthese.
[449] C. Rovelli. ‘Space is blue and birds fly through it’ , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[450] David Marcus Appleby,et al. Concerning Dice and Divinity , 2007 .
[451] Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics , 2018, 1805.10602.
[452] Charis Anastopoulos. Frequently Asked Questions About Decoherence , 2000 .
[453] Alexia Auffeves,et al. Violation of Bell’s inequalities in a quantum realistic framework , 2016, 1601.03966.
[454] A. Bolotin. Constructibility of the Universal Wave Function , 2015, 1512.06845.
[455] Scott Tanona. Decoherence and the Copenhagen cut , 2012, Synthese.
[456] G. E. Romero. On the Ontology of Spacetime: Substantivalism, Relationism, Eternalism, and Emergence , 2017 .
[457] Diederik Aerts,et al. The extended Bloch representation of quantum mechanics and the hidden-measurement solution to the measurement problem , 2014, 1404.2429.
[458] K. Landsman. On the notion of free will in the Free Will Theorem , 2017 .
[459] Kristian Camilleri. Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation , 2009, Perspectives on Science.
[460] O. Lombardi,et al. Understanding decoherence as an irreversible process , 2018 .
[461] H. Wiseman,et al. Bell Nonlocality, Signal Locality and Unpredictability (or What Bohr Could Have Told Einstein at Solvay Had He Known About Bell Experiments) , 2009, 0911.2504.
[462] A. Pati,et al. Products of weak values: Uncertainty relations, complementarity, and incompatibility , 2016, 1603.05776.
[463] Tian Yu Cao,et al. Prerequisites for a Consistent Framework of Quantum Gravity , 2001 .
[464] C. Callender. The emergence and interpretation of probability in Bohmian mechanics , 2007 .
[465] J. Vaccaro. Quantum asymmetry between time and space , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[466] A. Budiyono. Is Nonlocality Responsible for the Violation of Bell’s Inequalities? , 2014, 1404.1528.
[467] Shane Mansfield,et al. Reality of the quantum state: Towards a stronger ψ-ontology theorem , 2014, 1412.0669.
[468] K. Svozil. Space and Time in a Quantized World , 2014, 1401.7212.
[469] N. David Mermin,et al. What is quantum mechanics trying to tell us , 1998, quant-ph/9801057.
[470] A. Sciarretta. A Local-Realistic Model of Quantum Mechanics Based on a Discrete Spacetime , 2017, 1712.03227.
[471] A. Cabello. Interpretations of quantum theory: A map of madness , 2015, 1509.04711.
[472] F. Holik,et al. No Labeling Quantum Mechanics of Indiscernible Particles , 2009, 0904.3476.
[473] Emily Adlam,et al. Spooky Action at a Temporal Distance , 2018, Entropy.
[474] Stephen L. Adler,et al. Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: A Response to P. W. Anderson , 2003 .
[475] Mark Newman,et al. Theoretical Understanding in Science , 2015, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[476] R. Griffiths. Consistent Quantum Theory , 2001 .
[477] Reply to Fleming: Symmetries, observables, and the occurrence of events , 2015 .
[478] Luis Manuel Arévalo Aguilar,et al. A Survey of the Concept of Disturbance in Quantum Mechanics , 2019, Entropy.
[479] The Construction of Quantum Reality , 2012 .
[480] H. Grelland. The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis And The Meaning Of Quantum Mechanics , 2006 .
[481] Exclusion Principle and the Identity of Indiscernibles: a Response to Margenau's Argument , 2001, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[482] F. Laloë,et al. Surrealistic Bohmian trajectories do not occur with macroscopic pointers , 2018, The European Physical Journal D.
[483] Jochen Szangolies,et al. Epistemic Horizons and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , 2018, Foundations of Physics.
[484] Louis Vervoort,et al. Bell’s Theorem: Two Neglected Solutions , 2012, Foundations of Physics.
[485] O. Lombardi,et al. A Top-down View of the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics , 2017 .
[486] Dennis Dieks,et al. A Contextual Approach to Scientific Understanding , 2005, Synthese.
[487] Michael J. W. Hall,et al. Nonlocality in Bell’s Theorem, in Bohm’s Theory, and in Many Interacting Worlds Theorising , 2018, Entropy.
[488] Jonas R. Becker Arenhart,et al. The received view on quantum non-individuality: formal and metaphysical analysis , 2017, Synthese.
[489] T. P. Singh. Space-time from Collapse of the Wave-function , 2018, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A.
[490] Branches in the Everett interpretation , 2014 .
[491] J. Linnett,et al. Quantum mechanics , 1975, Nature.
[492] M. Seevinck. Holism, physical theories and quantum mechanics☆ , 2004, quant-ph/0402047.
[493] Andrew Schumann,et al. Quantum non-objectivity from performativity of quantum phenomena , 2014, 1404.7077.
[494] Bohr's Conception of the Quantum Mechanical State of a System and Its Role in the Framework of Complementarity , 2002, quant-ph/0210075.
[495] S. Rashkovskiy. Quantum mechanics without quanta: 2. The nature of the electron , 2017 .
[496] George Neville-Neil,et al. The observer effect , 2017, Commun. ACM.
[497] V. Karakostas. Realism and Objectivism in Quantum Mechanics , 2012, 1203.0179.
[498] Robert Kane,et al. The complex tapestry of free will: striving will, indeterminism and volitional streams , 2016, Synthese.
[499] H. Perlman. Quantum Mechanics is Incomplete but it is Consistent with Locality , 2017 .
[500] Leah Henderson,et al. Quantum reaxiomatisations and information-theoretic interpretations of quantum theory , 2018 .
[501] Armond Duwell. Re-conceiving quantum theories in terms of information-theoretic constraints , 2007 .
[502] A. Khrennikov. After Bell , 2016, 1603.08674.
[503] Leonard Susskind,et al. Copenhagen vs Everett, Teleportation, and ER=EPR , 2016, 1604.02589.
[504] H. Everett. "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics , 1957 .
[505] Andrei Khrennikov,et al. Bell-Boole Inequality: Nonlocality or Probabilistic Incompatibility of Random Variables? , 2008, Entropy.
[506] A. Plotnitsky. What is complementarity?: Niels Bohr and the architecture of quantum theory , 2014 .
[507] A. Zeilinger,et al. Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell's Theorem with Entangled Photons. , 2015, Physical review letters.
[508] H. Weinfurter,et al. Event-Ready Bell Test Using Entangled Atoms Simultaneously Closing Detection and Locality Loopholes. , 2016, Physical review letters.
[509] O. Darrigol. ‘Shut up and contemplate!’: Lucien Hardy׳s reasonable axioms for quantum theory , 2015 .
[510] Daniel A. Wilkenfeld,et al. Understanding as representation manipulability , 2011, Synthese.
[512] Jan Hilgevoord,et al. Time in quantum mechanics: a story of confusion , 2005 .
[513] Alisa Bokulich,et al. Can Classical Structures Explain Quantum Phenomena? , 2008, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[514] D. Sudarsky,et al. Interpretations of Quantum Theory in the Light of Modern Cosmology , 2014, 1412.7576.
[515] Y. Aharonov,et al. Interaction-Free Effects Between Distant Atoms , 2016, Foundations of Physics.
[516] E. Brändas. There Are Quantum Jumps , 2015 .
[517] A. Tosi,et al. Determining the quantum expectation value by measuring a single photon , 2017, Nature Physics.
[518] W. V. Camp. Explaining understanding (or understanding explanation) , 2014 .
[519] B. W. Roberts. A general perspective on time observables , 2014, 1404.4961.
[520] J. Arenhart. Ontological Frameworks for Scientific Theories , 2012 .
[521] Samuel C. Fletcher. What counts as a Newtonian system? The view from Norton’s dome , 2012 .
[522] G. E. Romero. Mario Bunge on Gravitational Waves and the Reality of Spacetime , 2018 .
[523] B. Svensson. Quantum Weak Values and Logic: An Uneasy Couple , 2016, 1605.03023.
[524] I. Bialynicki-Birula. PHOTON AS A QUANTUM PARTICLE , 2006 .
[525] D. Bedingham. Collapse models and spacetime symmetries , 2016, 1612.09470.
[526] J. Golosz. Weak Interactions: Asymmetry of Time or Asymmetry in Time? , 2017 .
[527] C. Moyer. Timelines and Quantum Time Operators , 2015 .
[528] C. Feinstein. Why do We Live in a Quantum World , 2016 .
[529] H. Hofmann,et al. On the relation between measurement outcomes and physical properties , 2016, 1603.06291.
[530] E. Nahmad-Achar,et al. Quantum Locality, Rings a Bell?: Bell’s Inequality Meets Local Reality and True Determinism , 2016, 1605.08493.
[531] James Read. In defence of Everettian decision theory , 2018, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.
[532] T. Nieuwenhuizen,et al. Is the Contextuality Loophole Fatal for the Derivation of Bell Inequalities? , 2011 .
[533] Peter J. Lewis. Quantum Ontology: A Guide to the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics , 2016 .
[534] N. Costa,et al. Quantum Mechanics: Ontology Without Individuals , 2014 .
[535] Junde Wu,et al. Outline of a Generalization and a Reinterpretation of Quantum Mechanics Recovering Objectivity , 2014, 1402.4394.
[536] Dimension and Illusion , 2010 .
[537] David Maccallum,et al. Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony , 1996 .
[538] Olivier Darrigol,et al. Le monde quantique , 2014 .
[539] J. Maziero. A relação de incerteza de Maccone-Pati , 2017 .
[540] C. Beisbart. A Humean Guide to Spielraum Probabilities , 2016 .
[541] M. Esfeld. Ontic structural realism and the interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2013 .
[542] Juha Saatsi,et al. Replacing recipe realism , 2017, Synthese.
[543] Doreen Fraser. The fate of 'particles' in quantum field theories with interactions , 2008 .
[544] O. Lombardi,et al. A general theoretical framework for decoherence in open and closed systems , 2008, 0907.1337.
[545] M. Schlosshauer. Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics , 2003, quant-ph/0312059.