Understanding quantum mechanics: a review and synthesis in precise language

Abstract This review, of the understanding of quantum mechanics, is broad in scope, and aims to reflect enough of the literature to be representative of the current state of the subject. To enhance clarity, the main findings are presented in the form of a coherent synthesis of the reviewed sources. The review highlights core characteristics of quantum mechanics. One is statistical balance in the collective response of an ensemble of identically prepared systems, to differing measurement types. Another is that states are mathematical terms prescribing probability aspects of future events, relating to an ensemble of systems, in various situations. These characteristics then yield helpful insights on entanglement, measurement, and widely-discussed experiments and analyses. The review concludes by considering how these insights are supported, illustrated and developed by some specific approaches to understanding quantum mechanics. The review uses non-mathematical language precisely (terms defined) and rigorously (consistent meanings), and uses only such language. A theory more descriptive of independent reality than is quantum mechanics may yet be possible. One step in the pursuit of such a theory is to reach greater consensus on how to understand quantum mechanics. This review aims to contribute to achieving that greater consensus, and so to that pursuit.

[1]  A. Winter What does an experimental test of quantum contextuality prove or disprove? , 2014, 1408.0945.

[2]  Anthony Sudbery The logic of the future in quantum theory , 2016, Synthese.

[3]  Robert W. Spekkens,et al.  Quantum Theory: Informational Foundations and Foils , 2015, 1805.11483.

[4]  Allen Stairs A loose and separate certainty: Caves, Fuchs and Schack on quantum probability one , 2011 .

[5]  C. Werndl On the observational equivalence of continuous-time deterministic and indeterministic descriptions , 2011, 1310.1620.

[6]  Jeffrey Bub Quantum Mechanics is About Quantum Information , 2005 .

[7]  C. Fields Consistent Quantum Mechanics Admits No Mereotopology , 2012, 1205.2887.

[8]  Tobias Fox Haunted by the Spectre of Virtual Particles: A Philosophical Reconsideration , 2008 .

[9]  P. Mittelstaedt Are the Laws of Quantum Logic Laws of Nature? , 2012 .

[10]  Jianhao M. Yang,et al.  Relational Formulation of Quantum Measurement , 2018, International Journal of Theoretical Physics.

[11]  Markus P. Mueller,et al.  Quantum theory as a principle theory: insights from an information-theoretic reconstruction , 2017, 1707.05602.

[12]  Luigi Accardi,et al.  Could we now convince Einstein , 2006 .

[13]  Karl Hess,et al.  Special Issue: Ever New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests , 2017 .

[14]  Ronnie Hermens Speakable in quantum mechanics , 2012, Synthese.

[15]  R. Frigg,et al.  Everything you always wanted to know about structural realism but were afraid to ask , 2011 .

[16]  Mario Alai The Debates on Scientific Realism Today: Knowledge and Objectivity in Science , 2017 .

[17]  D. Sokolovski Path probabilities for consecutive measurements, and certain “quantum paradoxes” , 2018, Annals of Physics.

[18]  Mark A. Wilson,et al.  Determinism and the Mystery of the Missing Physics , 2009, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[19]  Marian Kupczynski,et al.  Can we close the Bohr–Einstein quantum debate? , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  Erik Curiel On the Existence of Spacetime Structure , 2015, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[21]  Weak Values and Consistent Histories in Quantum Theory , 2002, quant-ph/0207182.

[22]  D. A. Graft Rhetoric, logic, and experiment in the quantum nonlocality debate , 2017 .

[23]  R. Omnes Consistent Histories and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 1995 .

[24]  P. Kosso,et al.  Quantum Mechanics and Realism , 2000 .

[25]  Pablo Acuña Inertial Trajectories in de Broglie-Bohm Quantum Theory: An Unexpected Problem , 2016 .

[26]  I. Licata,et al.  Fluidodynamical Representation and Quantum Jumps , 2017 .

[27]  Wayne C. Myrvold,et al.  What is a wavefunction? , 2015, Synthese.

[28]  Steven French,et al.  Metaphysical underdetermination: why worry? , 2011, Synthese.

[29]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Bell Could Become the Copernicus of Probability , 2014, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[30]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  A snapshot of foundational attitudes toward quantum mechanics , 2013, 1301.1069.

[31]  Buonomano against Bell: Nonergodicity or nonlocality? , 2005, quant-ph/0512178.

[32]  R. Omnes Is Uniqueness of Reality Predicted by the Quantum Laws , 2017 .

[33]  D. Bohm A SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTUM THEORY IN TERMS OF "HIDDEN" VARIABLES. II , 1952 .

[34]  E. Schrödinger Probability relations between separated systems , 1936, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[35]  Alastair Wilson Objective Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics , 2013, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[36]  Complementarity of representations in quantum mechanics , 2001, quant-ph/0110102.

[37]  P. Rocchi,et al.  An Essay on the Double Nature of the Probability , 2012, 1301.5443.

[38]  T. P. Singh Wave function collapse, non-locality, and space-time structure , 2017, 1701.09132.

[39]  D. Struppa,et al.  Finally making sense of the double-slit experiment , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  R. Hughes,et al.  The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .

[41]  Quentin Ruyant,et al.  Can We Make Sense of Relational Quantum Mechanics? , 2018 .

[42]  R. G. Torromé Emergent Quantum Mechanics and the Origin of Quantum Non-local Correlations , 2017, 1707.05465.

[43]  Kristel Michielsen,et al.  Logical inference derivation of the quantum theoretical description of Stern–Gerlach and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm experiments , 2018, Annals of Physics.

[44]  Reductionism, emergence, and effective field theories , 2001, physics/0101039.

[45]  R. Kastner Why the Afshar experiment does not refute complementarity , 2005, quant-ph/0502021.

[46]  David Wallace Quantum Probability from Subjective Likelihood: improving on Deutsch's proof of the probability rule , 2003 .

[47]  Michael E. Cuffaro Reconsidering No-Go Theorems from a Practical Perspective , 2015, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[48]  D. Fiscaletti,et al.  Searching for an adequate relation between time and entanglement , 2017 .

[49]  Bohmian trajectories and the ether: Where does the analogy fail? , 2005, quant-ph/0502049.

[50]  A. Peres Karl Popper and the Copenhagen interpretation , 2002 .

[51]  Alejandro Andrés Hnilo,et al.  Using Measured Values in Bell's Inequalities Entails at Least One Hypothesis in Addition to Local Realism , 2017, Entropy.

[52]  Michael Esfeld,et al.  The primitive ontology of quantum physics: guidelines for an assessment of the proposals , 2014, 1406.0732.

[53]  Kareem Khalifa,et al.  The Role of Explanation in Understanding , 2013, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[54]  A. Hagar Decoherence: the view from the history and philosophy of science , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[55]  Selma Dundar-Coecke,et al.  Ramifications of quantum physics for education , 2014 .

[56]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  A note on different definitions of momentum disturbance , 2013, 1307.3604.

[57]  Marian Kupczynski,et al.  The Contextuality Loophole is Fatal for the Derivation of Bell Inequalities: Reply to a Comment by I. Schmelzer , 2016, 1611.05021.

[58]  Rodolfo Gambini,et al.  The Montevideo Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: A Short Review , 2015, Entropy.

[59]  H. Fearn,et al.  A Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser Explained by the Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2015, 1501.00970.

[60]  Giulio Chiribella,et al.  Agents, Subsystems, and the Conservation of Information , 2018, Entropy.

[61]  Eliahu Cohen,et al.  The Weak Reality That Makes Quantum Phenomena More Natural: Novel Insights and Experiments , 2018, Entropy.

[62]  Eddy Keming Chen Our Fundamental Physical Space: An Essay on the Metaphysics of the Wave Function , 2017, 2110.14531.

[63]  Diese Verdammte Quantenspringerei , 2000, quant-ph/0011082.

[64]  Bradley Monton,et al.  The problem of ontology for spontaneous collapse theories , 2004 .

[65]  Robert W. Spekkens,et al.  Einstein, Incompleteness, and the Epistemic View of Quantum States , 2007, 0706.2661.

[66]  R. Dawid,et al.  Against the empirical viability of the Deutsch-Wallace-Everett approach to quantum mechanics , 2014 .

[67]  M. Esfeld Collapse or no collapse? What is the best ontology of quantum mechanics in the primitive ontology framework? , 2016, 1611.09218.

[68]  G. D’Ariano Causality re-established , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[69]  Edward Fredkin,et al.  An Introduction to Digital Philosophy , 2003 .

[71]  J. Wolff Observability, Visualizability and the Question of Metaphysical Neutrality , 2015 .

[72]  S. Bruce Discrete Time and Intrinsic Length in Quantum Mechanics , 2003 .

[73]  R. Kastner The Born Rule and Free Will: why Libertarian Agent-Causal Free Will is not "antiscientific" , 2016 .

[74]  QUANTUM MECHANICS EXPLAINED , 2006, quant-ph/0607005.

[75]  A. Khrennikov Towards a Resolution of Dilemma: Nonlocality or Nonobjectivity? , 2012 .

[76]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Bell argument: Locality or realism? Time to make the choice , 2011, 1108.0001.

[77]  S. Wehner,et al.  Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres , 2015, Nature.

[78]  B. Englert,et al.  Complementarity and uncertainty , 1995, Nature.

[79]  Jochen Kluve On the Role of Counterfactuals in Inferring Causal Effects , 2001 .

[80]  Richard D. Gill,et al.  Appendix to "Accardi contra Bell (cum mundi) : The Impossible Coupling" , 2001, quant-ph/0110137.

[81]  Tim Maudlin,et al.  Ontological Clarity via Canonical Presentation: Electromagnetism and the Aharonov–Bohm Effect , 2018, Entropy.

[82]  J. Saatsi Scientific Realism Meets Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics , 2017, Synthese Library.

[83]  G. Belot Quantum states for primitive ontologists , 2012 .

[84]  J. Sprenger The objectivity of Subjective Bayesianism , 2018 .

[85]  J. Hartle Quantum physics and human language , 2006, The Quantum Universe.

[86]  Kevin Vanslette Entropic dynamics: a hybrid-contextual model of quantum mechanics , 2017, Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations.

[87]  L. Smolin,et al.  Quantum theory from quantum gravity , 2003, gr-qc/0311059.

[88]  Roger Colbeck,et al.  The Completeness of Quantum Theory for Predicting Measurement Outcomes , 2016 .

[89]  H. Briegel,et al.  A Stochastic Process Model for Free Agency under Indeterminism , 2018, Dialectica.

[90]  Michael Esfeld,et al.  Observables and Unobservables in Quantum Mechanics: How the No-Hidden-Variables Theorems Support the Bohmian Particle Ontology , 2018, Entropy.

[91]  Realism and Understanding , 2003 .

[92]  Kevin H. Knuth,et al.  Quantum Theory and Probability Theory: Their Relationship and Origin in Symmetry , 2011, Symmetry.

[93]  D. Wallace On the Plurality of Quantum Theories: Quantum Theory as a Framework, and its Implications for the Quantum Measurement Problem , 2018 .

[94]  R. N. Schouten,et al.  Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km , 2015, 1508.05949.

[95]  T. Bigaj Are field quanta real objects? Some remarks on the ontology of quantum field theory , 2017 .

[96]  Elizabeth Miller Quantum Entanglement, Bohmian Mechanics, and Humean Supervenience , 2014 .

[97]  P. Busch The Time-Energy Uncertainty Relation , 2002 .

[98]  Allen Stairs Quantum Logic, Realism, and Value Definiteness , 1983, Philosophy of Science.

[99]  J. Munkhammar Canonical Relational Quantum Mechanics from Information Theory , 2011, 1101.1417.

[100]  Maximilian Schlosshauer,et al.  Implications of the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph quantum no-go theorem. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[101]  A. Budiyono Quantum Dynamics and Kinematics from a Statistical Model Selected by the Principle of Locality , 2013, 1301.5345.

[102]  Richard Healey,et al.  A pragmatist view of the metaphysics of entanglement , 2020, Synthese.

[103]  Raffael Krismer,et al.  Representation Lost: The Case for a Relational Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2018, Entropy.

[104]  N. David Mermin What Do These Correlations Know about Reality? Nonlocality and the Absurd , 1998 .

[105]  Louis Marchildon,et al.  Why Should We Interpret Quantum Mechanics? , 2004 .

[106]  M. Esfeld,et al.  On the Importance of Interpretation in Quantum Physics: A Reply to Elise Crull , 2015, 1504.02642.

[107]  R. Werner,et al.  Colloquium: Quantum root-mean-square error and measurement uncertainty relations , 2013, 1312.4393.

[108]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Contextuality Analysis of the Double Slit Experiment (with a Glimpse into Three Slits) , 2018, Entropy.

[109]  M. Kiran,et al.  Interfering Quantum Trajectories Without Which-Way Information , 2017 .

[110]  Paul Teller,et al.  Particles, particle labels, and quanta: The toll of unacknowledged metaphysics , 1991 .

[111]  Adán Cabello,et al.  HOW MANY QUESTIONS DO YOU NEED TO PROVE THAT UNASKED QUESTIONS HAVE NO ANSWERS , 2006 .

[112]  Darrell P. Rowbottom,et al.  Scientific realism: what it is, the contemporary debate, and new directions , 2017, Synthese.

[113]  L. Di'osi How to teach and think about spontaneous wave function collapse theories: not like before , 2017, 1710.02814.

[114]  Nikola Burić,et al.  Relations Between Different Notions of Degrees of Freedom of a Quantum System and Its Classical Model , 2014, 1411.4425.

[115]  F. Zalamea The Mathematical Description of a Generic Physical System , 2015 .

[116]  M. Esfeld,et al.  Relationalism about mechanics based on a minimalist ontology of matter , 2016, European Journal for Philosophy of Science.

[117]  M. Redhead Incompleteness, nonlocality, and realism , 1987 .

[118]  Armen E. Allahverdyan,et al.  Understanding quantum measurement from the solution of dynamical models , 2011, 1107.2138.

[119]  A. Mitra,et al.  On The Foundations Of Quantum Theory , 2005 .

[120]  Albert Solé-Ribalta,et al.  Introduction: space–time and the wave function , 2015, Synthese.

[121]  Basil J. Hiley,et al.  From the Heisenberg Picture to Bohm: a New Perspective on Active Information and its relation to Shannon Information. , 2002 .

[122]  G. Jaeger,et al.  Entanglement, Information, and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2010 .

[123]  C. Antonopoulos Making the Quantum of Relevance , 2005 .

[124]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The Violation of Bell Inequalities in the Macroworld , 2000, quant-ph/0007044.

[125]  David Wallace,et al.  Lessons from realistic physics for the metaphysics of quantum theory , 2020, Synthese.

[126]  M. Kupczynski Quantum mechanics and modeling of physical reality , 2018, Physica Scripta.

[127]  GianCarlo Ghirardi,et al.  Dynamical reduction models , 2003 .

[128]  Mauro Dorato,et al.  GRW as an ontology of dispositions , 2010 .

[129]  P. Dirac Principles of Quantum Mechanics , 1982 .

[130]  Tuomas K. Pernu,et al.  Supervenient Freedom and the Free Will Deadlock , 2017 .

[131]  Chris Heunen,et al.  The Many Classical Faces of Quantum Structures , 2014, Entropy.

[132]  J. Bub Quantum Correlations and the Measurement Problem , 2012, 1210.6371.

[133]  Mordecai Waegell,et al.  An Ontology of Nature with Local Causality, Parallel Lives, and Many Relative Worlds , 2017, Foundations of Physics.

[134]  M. Egg Delayed-Choice Experiments and the Metaphysics of Entanglement , 2013, Foundations of Physics.

[135]  N. Mermin Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell , 1993, 1802.10119.

[136]  J. Berkovitz The Propensity Interpretation of Probability: A Re-evaluation , 2015 .

[137]  Danko D. Georgiev,et al.  Probing finite coarse-grained virtual Feynman histories with sequential weak values , 2017, 1709.08479.

[139]  Federico Laudisa Counterfactual Reasoning, Realism and Quantum Mechanics: Much Ado About Nothing? , 2017, 1705.08287.

[140]  O. Lombardi,et al.  Self-induced decoherence: a new approach , 2004 .

[141]  David Marcus Appleby,et al.  Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner , 2016, Entropy.

[142]  Mark Balaguer,et al.  Why there are no good arguments for any interesting version of determinism , 2009, Synthese.

[143]  D. Gillies Philosophical Theories of Probability , 2000 .

[144]  H. Primas Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism , 1981 .

[145]  Mario Hubert,et al.  The wave-function as a multi-field , 2017, 1710.03260.

[146]  D. Krause Do `classical' space and time provide identity to quantum particles? , 2017 .

[147]  Rafael D. Sorkin Quantum dynamics without the wavefunction , 2006 .

[148]  Itamar Pitowsky Quantum Mechanics as a Theory of Probability , 2006 .

[149]  Roman Frigg,et al.  Probability in GRW Theory , 2007 .

[150]  D. Krause,et al.  Ontological Issues in Quantum Theory , 2010 .

[151]  Elizabeth Miller,et al.  Two notions of holism , 2020, Synthese.

[152]  Surrealistic Bohmian trajectories appraised , 2017 .

[153]  The Direction of Time: From the Global Arrow to the Local Arrow , 2003, quant-ph/0301002.

[154]  Gerhard Grössing,et al.  Vacuum Landscaping: Cause of Nonlocal Influences without Signaling , 2018, Entropy.

[155]  Dennis Dieks,et al.  Von Neumann's Impossibility Proof: Mathematics in the Service of Rhetorics , 2017, 1801.09305.

[156]  R. Spekkens,et al.  Quantum from principles , 2012, ArXiv.

[157]  Laura Ruetsche The Shaky Game +25, or: on locavoracity , 2014, Synthese.

[158]  'Einselection' of Pointer Observables: The New H-Theorem? , 2014, 1406.4126.

[159]  Dennis Dieks Probability in modal interpretations of quantum mechanics , 2007 .

[160]  R. Spekkens,et al.  Quantum common causes and quantum causal models , 2016, 1609.09487.

[161]  C. Fuchs QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism , 2010, 1003.5209.

[162]  Lev Vaidman,et al.  Quantum theory and determinism , 2014, 1405.4222.

[163]  K. Knuth Understanding the Electron , 2015, 1511.07766.

[164]  Paul M. Näger The causal problem of entanglement , 2015, Synthese.

[165]  Jaroslaw Pykacz,et al.  Can Many-Valued Logic Help to Comprehend Quantum Phenomena? , 2014, 1408.2697.

[166]  Emily Adlam,et al.  Quantum Mechanics and Global Determinism , 2018, Quanta.

[167]  I. Pitowsky,et al.  Betting on the Outcomes of Measurements: A Bayesian Theory of Quantum Probability , 2002, quant-ph/0208121.

[168]  Jan Walleczek,et al.  Agent Inaccessibility as a Fundamental Principle in Quantum Mechanics: Objective Unpredictability and Formal Uncomputability , 2018, Entropy.

[169]  Alisa Bokulich,et al.  Losing Sight of the Forest for the Ψ: Beyond the Wavefunction Hegemony , 2019 .

[170]  Alyssa Ney Fundamental physical ontologies and the constraint of empirical coherence: a defense of wave function realism , 2014, Synthese.

[171]  Alexey V. Melkikh,et al.  Nonlinearity of Quantum Mechanics and Solution of the Problem of Wave Function Collapse , 2015 .

[172]  O. Stoica On the Wavefunction Collapse , 2016, 1601.02598.

[173]  C. Fuchs Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more) , 2002, quant-ph/0205039.

[174]  K. Mathew,et al.  Interfering Quantum Trajectories Without Which-Way Information , 2018, 1806.00603.

[175]  Elise M. Crull,et al.  Less Interpretation and More Decoherence in Quantum Gravity and Inflationary Cosmology , 2015 .

[176]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Why Bohmian Mechanics? One- and Two-Time Position Measurements, Bell Inequalities, Philosophy, and Physics , 2015, Entropy.

[177]  S. Rashkovskiy Quantum mechanics without quanta: the nature of the wave–particle duality of light , 2015, 1507.02113.

[178]  Samir Okasha,et al.  Philosophical Theories of Probability , 2002 .

[179]  Michael Esfeld,et al.  Primitive ontology and quantum state in the GRW matter density theory , 2014, Synthese.

[180]  Mathias Frisch No place for causes? Causal skepticism in physics , 2012 .

[181]  T. Nieuwenhuizen,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of two noncommuting quantum variables : Solution of a dynamical model , 2016, 1611.07937.

[182]  D. Ellerman Why delayed choice experiments do Not imply retrocausality , 2015 .

[183]  Wojciech H. Zurek,et al.  Objective past of a quantum universe: Redundant records of consistent histories , 2013, 1312.0331.

[184]  Dugald Murdoch,et al.  The Philosophical Writings , 1986 .

[185]  L. Felline Quantum theory is not only about information , 2018, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.

[186]  N. Mermin,et al.  Homer Nodded: Von Neumann’s Surprising Oversight , 2018, Foundations of Physics.

[187]  Stuart Kauffman,et al.  Taking Heisenberg’s Potentia Seriously , 2019, Adventures in Quantumland.

[188]  Nonlocal Position Changes of a Photon Revealed by Quantum Routers , 2017, Scientific reports.

[189]  Carlos Baladrón Elements for the Development of a Darwinian Scheme Leading to Quantum Mechanics , 2015 .

[190]  Katherine Robertson Can the two-time interpretation of quantum mechanics solve the measurement problem? , 2017 .

[191]  Tim N. Palmer,et al.  Experimental Non-Violation of the Bell Inequality , 2017, Entropy.

[192]  Farhad Taher Ghahramani,et al.  On the meaning of locality: the overlapping assumptions , 2015, 1509.03301.

[193]  R. Srinivasan LOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BOHR COMPLEMENTARITY PRINCIPLE IN AFSHAR'S EXPERIMENT UNDER THE NAFL INTERPRETATION , 2005, quant-ph/0504115.

[194]  V. Allori Primitive Ontology in a Nutshell , 2015 .

[195]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Are There Quantum Effects Coming from Outside Space-time? Nonlocality, free will and , 2010, 1011.3440.

[196]  About the Confusion Between the Course of Time and the Arrow of Time , 2007 .

[197]  Stefaan E. Cuypers,et al.  Determinism and the Paradox of Predictability , 2010 .

[198]  R. Haag Quantum Physics and Reality , 2001 .

[199]  Lev Vaidman,et al.  Position measurements in the de Broglie–Bohm interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2012, 1207.0793.

[200]  V. Allori Scientific Realism and Primitive Ontology Or: The Pessimistic Induction and the Nature of the Wave Function , 2018, Lato Sensu: Revue de la Société de philosophie des sciences.

[201]  Porter Williams,et al.  Scientific Realism Made Effective , 2019, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[202]  James T. Cushing,et al.  Philosophical concepts in physics , 1998 .

[203]  R. Griffiths What quantum measurements measure , 2017, 1704.08725.

[204]  M. Strien The Norton Dome and the Nineteenth Century Foundations of Determinism , 2014 .

[205]  Finding your marbles in wavefunction collapse theories , 2003 .

[206]  C. Unnikrishnan The incompatibility between local hidden variable theories and the fundamental conservation laws , 2005 .

[207]  Kelvin J. McQueen,et al.  In defence of the self-location uncertainty account of probability in the many-worlds interpretation , 2019, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.

[208]  Are Causal Laws a Relic of Bygone Age? , 2017 .

[209]  F. Birman Quantum Mechanics and the Plight of Physicalism , 2009 .

[210]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  CHSH Inequality: Quantum Probabilities as Classical Conditional Probabilities , 2014, 1406.4886.

[211]  Y. Aharonov,et al.  Measurement and collapse within the two-state vector formalism , 2014, 1406.6382.

[212]  Jean-Pierre Gazeau,et al.  From Classical to Quantum Models: The Regularising Rôle of Integrals, Symmetry and Probabilities , 2018, Foundations of Physics.

[213]  A. Elitzur,et al.  The Too-Late-Choice Experiment: Bell's Proof within a Setting Where the Nonlocal Effect's Target Is an Earlier Event , 2015, 1512.08275.

[214]  Robert B. Griffiths,et al.  Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics , 1984 .

[215]  William Seager,et al.  The Philosophical and Scientific Metaphysics of David Bohm , 2018, Entropy.

[216]  C. Isham,et al.  Classical and quantum probabilities as truth values , 2011, 1102.2213.

[217]  H. W. de Regt,et al.  Understanding Scientific Understanding , 2017 .

[218]  Peter J. Lewis Holism and Time Symmetry , 2016 .

[219]  S. Polyakov,et al.  Experimental Bounds on Classical Random Field Theories , 2014, Foundations of Physics.

[220]  Richard D. Gill,et al.  Statistics, causality and Bell's theorem , 2012, 1207.5103.

[221]  Guido Bacciagaluppi,et al.  Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference , 2009 .

[222]  O. Lombardi,et al.  A new application of the modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics: the problem of optical isomerism , 2017 .

[223]  Claus Beisbart,et al.  What Is Understanding? An Overview of Recent Debates in Epistemology and Philosophy of Science , 2017 .

[224]  Karl Svozil,et al.  New Forms of Quantum Value Indefiniteness Suggest That Incompatible Views on Contexts Are Epistemic , 2018, Entropy.

[225]  Giulio Chiribella,et al.  Quantum from Principles , 2016 .

[226]  M. S. Leifer,et al.  Is the Quantum State Real? An Extended Review of -ontology Theorems , 2014, 1409.1570.

[227]  T. Bilban Realism and Antirealism in Informational Foundations of Quantum Theory , 2014 .

[228]  N. Belnap,et al.  Branching with Uncertain Semantics , 2010, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[229]  T. Maudlin Three measurement problems , 1995 .

[230]  Lon Becker That von Neumann Did Not Believe in a Physical Collapse , 2004, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[231]  Christian de Ronde,et al.  The Logos Categorical Approach to Quantum Mechanics: I. Kochen-Specker Contextuality and Global Intensive Valuations , 2018, International Journal of Theoretical Physics.

[232]  J. Bouwel,et al.  Forms of Causal Explanation , 2005 .

[233]  C. Garola An Epistemic Interpretation of Quantum Probability via Contextuality , 2018, Foundations of Science.

[234]  W. Pietsch,et al.  What Is and Why Do We Need Philosophy of Physics? , 2012 .

[235]  A. Messiah Quantum Mechanics , 1961 .

[236]  Emily Adlam,et al.  The problem of confirmation in the Everett interpretation , 2014, 1504.01063.

[237]  Richard Healey,et al.  Quantum Theory: A Pragmatist Approach , 2010, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[238]  A. Kent Beable-guided quantum theories: Generalizing quantum probability laws , 2012, 1204.5961.

[239]  Andr'e L. G. Mandolesi Analysis of Wallace’s Proof of the Born Rule in Everettian Quantum Mechanics: Formal Aspects , 2015 .

[240]  Peter J. Lewis Conspiracy Theories of Quantum Mechanics , 2006, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[241]  Don Howard What Is Complementarity , 2013 .

[242]  S. Pinna The philosophy of quantum gravity – lessons from Nicolai Hartmann , 2015 .

[243]  W. James Pragmatism, A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking: Together With Four Related Essays Selected From The Meaning of Truth , 2010 .

[244]  Robert Flack,et al.  Feynman Paths and Weak Values , 2018, Entropy.

[245]  Olimpia Lombardi,et al.  A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2006, quant-ph/0610121.

[246]  A. Macdonald Entanglement, Joint Measurement, and State Reduction , 2001, quant-ph/0108129.

[247]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Indeterminism in Physics, Classical Chaos and Bohmian Mechanics: Are Real Numbers Really Real? , 2018, Erkenntnis.

[248]  Lucien Hardy,et al.  ARE QUANTUM STATES REAL , 2012, 1205.1439.

[249]  C. Werndl What Are the New Implications of Chaos for Unpredictability? , 2009, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[250]  Gregg S. Jaeger,et al.  Are Virtual Particles Less Real? , 2019, Entropy.

[251]  Thomas Pashby,et al.  Time and Quantum Theory: A History and A Prospectus , 2015 .

[252]  Time, classical and quantum , 2016, 1605.03534.

[253]  Abner Shimony,et al.  The logic of quantum mechanics , 1981 .

[254]  Matthew F Pusey,et al.  On the reality of the quantum state , 2011, Nature Physics.

[255]  Paul Teller,et al.  Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View , 1991 .

[256]  R. Healey Pragmatist Quantum Realism , 2018, Scientific Realism and the Quantum.

[257]  Tomasz Bigaj,et al.  On quantum entanglement, counterfactuals, causality and dispositions , 2020, Synthese.

[258]  Christopher G. Timpson,et al.  Quantum Bayesianism: A study , 2008, 0804.2047.

[259]  Vasudeva Jijnasu The uncertainty principle – A simplified review of the four versions , 2016 .

[260]  A Non‐Intuitionist’s Approach To The Interpretation Problem Of Quantum Mechanics , 2005 .

[261]  Philipp Berghofer Ontic structural realism and quantum field theory: Are there intrinsic properties at the most fundamental level of reality? , 2017 .

[262]  Slobodan Perović Emergence of complementarity and the Baconian roots of Niels Bohr's method , 2013 .

[263]  Cristian S. Calude,et al.  A variant of the Kochen-Specker theorem localising value indefiniteness , 2015, 1503.01985.

[264]  W. Myrvold Ontology for Collapse Theories , 2017 .

[265]  Sue Sulcs,et al.  The Nature of Light and Twentieth Century Experimental Physics , 2003 .

[266]  C. Rovelli,et al.  Relational Quantum Mechanics , 2006 .

[267]  D. Wallace The Quantum Revolution in Philosophy , 2020, Analysis.

[268]  I. Pitowsky Resolution of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen and Bell Paradoxes , 1982 .

[269]  T. Philbin Derivation of quantum probabilities from deterministic evolution , 2014, 1409.7891.

[270]  Olimpia Lombardi,et al.  Histories in quantum mechanics: distinguishing between formalism and interpretation , 2018 .

[271]  Ken B. Wharton,et al.  A New Class of Retrocausal Models , 2018, Entropy.

[272]  Ruth E. Kastner,et al.  The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2012 .

[273]  Dipankar Home,et al.  Conceptual Foundations Of Quantum Physics , 1997 .

[274]  Maximilian Schlosshauer-Selbach Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition , 2008 .

[275]  Deficiencies of Bohmian Trajectories in View of Basic Quantum Principles , 2014 .

[276]  W. Schwarz No Interpretation of Probability , 2018 .

[277]  Marian Kupczynski Bell Inequalities, Experimental Protocols and Contextuality , 2014 .

[278]  Kelvin J. McQueen Four Tails Problems for Dynamical Collapse Theories , 2015, 1501.05778.

[279]  André L. G. Mandolesi Analysis of Wallace’s Proof of the Born Rule in Everettian Quantum Mechanics II: Concepts and Axioms , 2018, Foundations of Physics.

[280]  A. Jordan,et al.  Colloquium : Understanding quantum weak values: Basics and applications , 2013, 1305.7154.

[281]  L. Ballentine Classicality without Decoherence: A Reply to Schlosshauer , 2008 .

[282]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Reality Without Realism: On the Ontological and Epistemological Architecture of Quantum Mechanics , 2015 .

[283]  Relational Interpretation of the Wave Function and a Possible Way Around Bell’s Theorem , 2006, quant-ph/0602060.

[284]  From Wave-Particle to Features-Event Complementarity , 2011 .

[285]  T. Maudlin Remarks on the passing of time , 2002 .

[286]  H. Elze Ontological states and dynamics of discrete (pre-)quantum systems , 2017, 1711.00324.

[287]  David Jennings,et al.  Distinct quantum states can be compatible with a single state of reality. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[288]  J. Bain CPT Invariance, the Spin-Statistics Connection, and the Ontology of Relativistic Quantum Field Theories , 2013 .

[289]  Michael Silberstein,et al.  Why the Tsirelson Bound? Bub’s Question and Fuchs’ Desideratum , 2018, Entropy.

[290]  J. Ladyman,et al.  Entanglement and non-factorizability , 2013 .

[291]  O. Bueno Constructive empiricism, partial structures and the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2014 .

[292]  Gerard 't Hooft,et al.  On the free-will postulate in Quantum Mechanics , 2007 .

[293]  S. Boughn,et al.  Making Sense of Bell’s Theorem and Quantum Nonlocality , 2017, 1703.11003.

[294]  T. P. Singh Testing the limits of quantum mechanics. , 2018, 1810.00167.

[295]  D. Krause Does Newtonian Space Provide Identity to Quantum Systems? , 2017, Foundations of Science.

[296]  P. Busch,et al.  Symmetry, Reference Frames, and Relational Quantities in Quantum Mechanics , 2017, 1703.10434.

[297]  A. Eagle Twenty-One Arguments against Propensity Analyses of Probability , 2004 .

[298]  Stathis Psillos,et al.  Scientific realism: quo vadis? Introduction: new thinking about scientific realism , 2017, Synthese.

[299]  W. Philipp,et al.  Bell's theorem and the problem of decidability between the views of Einstein and Bohr , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[300]  Louis Marchildon Remarks on Mohrhoff's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2004 .

[301]  P. Busch,et al.  Direct tests of measurement uncertainty relations: what it takes. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[302]  Peter J. Lewis,et al.  On the Status of Primitive Ontology , 2017 .

[303]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Particles as Conceptual Entities: A Possible Explanatory Framework for Quantum Theory , 2009, 1004.2530.

[304]  D. Brody,et al.  Quantum State Reduction , 2016, 1611.02664.

[305]  M. Kupczynski Entanglement and quantum nonlocality demystified , 2012, 1205.4636.

[306]  D. Sudarsky,et al.  Less Decoherence and More Coherence in Quantum Gravity, Inflationary Cosmology and Elsewhere , 2015, 1512.05298.

[307]  T. Maudlin The Universal and the Local in Quantum Theory , 2015, Synthese Library.

[308]  Andrea Oldofredi,et al.  Particle Creation and Annihilation: Two Bohmian Approaches , 2018, Lato Sensu: Revue de la Société de philosophie des sciences.

[309]  Kristian Camilleri Bohr, Heisenberg and the divergent views of complementarity , 2007 .

[310]  Richard Corry Retrocausal models for EPR , 2015 .

[311]  E. Knill,et al.  A strong loophole-free test of local realism , 2015, 2016 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[312]  Christian de Ronde,et al.  Quantum Superpositions and the Representation of Physical Reality Beyond Measurement Outcomes and Mathematical Structures , 2016, 1603.06112.

[313]  The Wave Function and Quantum Reality , 2011, 1108.1187.

[314]  Vojtěch Havlíček,et al.  A ‘problem of time’ in the multiplicative scheme for the n-site hopper , 2017, 1706.03793.

[315]  T. Qureshi,et al.  Einstein's Recoiling Slit Experiment, Complementarity and Uncertainty , 2012, 1210.4248.

[316]  E. Davies Some Remarks on the Foundations of Quantum Theory , 2005, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[317]  Giovanni Valente Restoring particle phenomenology , 2015 .

[318]  Howard Barnum,et al.  Post-Classical Probability Theory , 2012, 1205.3833.

[319]  Elise Crull Yes, More Decoherence: A Reply to Critics , 2017 .

[320]  About a “Contextuality Loophole” in Bell’s Theorem Claimed to Exist by Nieuwenhuizen , 2016, 1610.09642.

[321]  Peter W. Evans,et al.  Retrocausality at no extra cost , 2014, Synthese.

[322]  Foad Dizadji-Bahmani The Probability Problem in Everettian Quantum Mechanics Persists , 2015, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[323]  O. Lévêque,et al.  Classical and Quantum Probability in the ∈-Model , 1999 .

[324]  H. Wiseman Quantum discord is Bohr’s notion of non-mechanical disturbance introduced to counter the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen argument , 2012, 1208.4964.

[325]  Karl Hess,et al.  Breakdown of Bell's theorem for certain objective local parameter spaces , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[326]  A. Rizzi Does the PBR Theorem Rule out a Statistical Understanding of QM? , 2018, Foundations of Physics.

[327]  Louis Marchildon,et al.  Multiplicity in Everett's interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2015, 1504.04835.

[328]  Alexia Auffèves,et al.  Contexts, Systems and Modalities: A New Ontology for Quantum Mechanics , 2014, 1409.2120.

[329]  V. Allori Quantum Mechanics and Paradigm Shifts , 2015 .

[330]  Armen E. Allahverdyan,et al.  72 57 v 1 [ qu an tph ] 2 8 M ar 2 01 3 Statistical theory of ideal quantum measurement processes , 2014 .

[331]  Karl Hess,et al.  A possible loophole in the theorem of Bell , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[332]  R. Hermens The problem of contextuality and the impossibility of experimental metaphysics thereof , 2010, 1012.3052.

[333]  C. Garola Interpreting Quantum Logic as a Pragmatic Structure , 2017 .

[334]  Robert B. Griffiths,et al.  The New Quantum Logic , 2013, 1311.2619.

[335]  T. Nieuwenhuizen A subquantum arrow of time , 2014, 1409.3131.

[336]  Nonlinear Schrödinger equation and classical-field description of thermal radiation , 2018, 1802.01979.

[337]  Lev Vaidman,et al.  When Photons Are Lying about Where They Have Been , 2018, Entropy.

[338]  O. Lombardi,et al.  The role of symmetry in the interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2016, 1602.07160.

[339]  Emilio Santos,et al.  Towards a Realistic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Providing a Model of the Physical World , 2012, 1203.5688.

[340]  Benjamin C. Jantzen Entities Without Identity: A Semantical Dilemma , 2019 .

[341]  J. Vaccaro The quantum theory of time, the block universe, and human experience , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[342]  J. Bell,et al.  Schrödinger: Are there quantum jumps? , 1987 .

[343]  James D. Fraser,et al.  The Real Problem with Perturbative Quantum Field Theory , 2017, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[344]  Craig Callender,et al.  One world, one beable , 2014, Synthese.

[345]  N. Kampen,et al.  Ten theorems about quantum mechanical measurements , 1988 .

[346]  T. P. Singh,et al.  Nonlinear quantum mechanics, the superposition principle, and the quantum measurement problem , 2009, 0912.2845.

[347]  Mauro Dorato Events and the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics , 2015 .

[348]  P. Stamp Environmental decoherence versus intrinsic decoherence , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[349]  A. Ney Ontological Reduction and the Wave Function Ontology , 2013 .

[350]  Jon Williamson,et al.  Why Frequentists and Bayesians Need Each Other , 2013 .

[351]  J. Barrett Everett’s pure wave mechanics and the notion of worlds , 2011 .

[352]  S. Friederich In defence of non-ontic accounts of quantum states , 2012, 1204.6738.

[353]  Michael Esfeld,et al.  Bell’s Theorem and the Issue of Determinism and Indeterminism , 2015 .

[354]  C. Thron,et al.  A SIGNAL-PROCESSING INTERPRETATION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS , 2013 .

[355]  R. Tumulka,et al.  Epistemology of Wave Function Collapse in Quantum Physics , 2013, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[356]  Curtis Forbes,et al.  A pragmatic, existentialist approach to the scientific realism debate , 2016, Synthese.

[357]  P. N. Kaloyerou Critique of Quantum Optical Experimental Refutations of Bohr’s Principle of Complementarity, of the Wootters–Zurek Principle of Complementarity, and of the Particle–Wave Duality Relation , 2014, 1408.4061.

[358]  Roderich Tumulka,et al.  What Is Bohmian Mechanics , 2001, Compendium of Quantum Physics.

[359]  D. M. Appleby Facts, Values and Quanta , 2005 .

[360]  J. Maziero A relação de incerteza de Maccone-Pati , 2017, 1705.09139.

[361]  Sheldon Goldstein,et al.  Reality and the Role of the Wavefunction in Quantum Theory , 2011, 1101.4575.

[363]  S. Weiss Conceptual Foundations Of Quantum Mechanics , 2016 .

[364]  E. Richard Cohen,et al.  Foundations of Quantum Theory , 1955 .

[365]  Federico Laudisa,et al.  Against the ‘no-go’ philosophy of quantum mechanics , 2014 .

[366]  F. Strocchi The physical principles of quantum mechanics. A critical review , 2011, 1112.1507.

[367]  Andreas Doering,et al.  “What is a Thing?”: Topos Theory in the Foundations of Physics , 2008, 0803.0417.

[368]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum epistemology from subquantum ontology: quantum mechanics from theory of classical random fields , 2016, 1605.05907.

[369]  Karl Hess Einstein Was Right , 2014 .

[370]  D. M. Appleby The Bell–Kochen–Specker theorem , 2003, quant-ph/0308114.

[371]  J. Boisvert,et al.  Absorbers in the Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2012, 1207.5230.

[372]  A. Sudbery John Bell and the Great Enterprise , 2018, Quanta.

[373]  Oliver Passon On a Common Misconception Regarding the de Broglie–Bohm Theory , 2018, Entropy.

[374]  Decio Krause,et al.  Logical Aspects of Quantum (Non-)Individuality , 2008, 0812.1404.

[375]  E. Schrödinger Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems , 1935, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[376]  R. Healey Quantum Theory: Realism or Pragmatism? , 2018, Análisis. Revista de investigación filosófica.

[377]  G. Hooft Relating the quantum mechanics of discrete systems to standard canonical quantum mechanics , 2012, 1204.4926.

[378]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Collapse. What else , 2017, 1701.08300.

[379]  Matthew F Pusey,et al.  Can a quantum state over time resemble a quantum state at a single time? , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[380]  Robert W. Spekkens,et al.  Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , 2007 .

[381]  Andrea Oldofredi,et al.  No-Go Theorems and the Foundations of Quantum Physics , 2018, 1904.10991.

[382]  Leslie E Ballentine,et al.  Propensity, Probability, and Quantum Theory , 2016 .

[383]  J. Henson Non-separability Does Not Relieve the Problem of Bell’s Theorem , 2013, 1302.7188.

[384]  Richard Johns Epistemic theories of objective chance , 2018, Synthese.

[385]  Asher Peres What's Wrong with These Observables? , 2002 .

[386]  Lukasz Rudnicki,et al.  Uncertainty Relations for Coarse–Grained Measurements: An Overview , 2018, Entropy.

[387]  B. Mielnik Generalized quantum mechanics , 1974 .

[388]  J. Neumann Mathematische grundlagen der Quantenmechanik , 1935 .

[389]  Federico Holik,et al.  Contextuality and Indistinguishability , 2017, Entropy.

[390]  R. Hermens An Instrumentalists Approach Towards Quantum Logic , 2011 .

[391]  T. Bilban Husserl’s Reconsideration of the Observation Process and Its Possible Connections with Quantum Mechanics: Supplementation of Informational Foundations of Quantum Theory , 2013 .

[392]  Hans Halvorson,et al.  Are Rindler Quanta Real? Inequivalent Particle Concepts in Quantum Field Theory , 2000, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[393]  A. S. Sanz,et al.  Bohm’s approach to quantum mechanics: Alternative theory or practical picture? , 2017, Frontiers of Physics.

[394]  R. Rosa The Merli–Missiroli–Pozzi Two-Slit Electron-Interference Experiment , 2012, Physics in perspective.

[395]  Christopher Ferrie,et al.  Why protective measurement does not establish the reality of the quantum state , 2015, 1509.08893.

[396]  T. Maudlin Completeness, supervenience and ontology , 2007 .

[397]  Gerard 't Hooft,et al.  The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2014, 1405.1548.

[398]  G. N. Fleming Response to Dr. Pashby: Time operators and POVM observables in quantum mechanics☆ , 2015 .

[399]  A. Fine Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell Inequalities , 1982 .

[400]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  A Qualified Kolmogorovian Account of Probabilistic Contextuality , 2013, QI.

[401]  Johannes Kofler,et al.  Delayed-choice gedanken experiments and their realizations , 2014, 1407.2930.

[402]  E. Schrödinger Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.

[403]  Matteo Morganti,et al.  Interpreting Quantum Entanglement: Steps towards Coherentist Quantum Mechanics , 2020, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[404]  J. Barrett The distribution postulate in Bohm's theory , 1995 .

[405]  Jaakko Kuorikoski,et al.  External representations and scientific understanding , 2014, Synthese.

[406]  A. Bracken,et al.  Waiting for the quantum bus: the flow of negative probability , 2014 .

[407]  D. Dieks Space and Time in Particle and Field Physics , 2001 .

[408]  A. Grinbaum How device-independent approaches change the meaning of physical theory , 2015, 1512.01035.

[409]  H. Nikolić Quantum Mechanics: Myths and Facts , 2006, quant-ph/0609163.

[410]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Epistemic and Ontic Quantum Realities , 2003 .

[411]  C. Norris Quantum Nonlocality and the Challenge to Scientific Realism , 2000 .

[412]  N. D. Hari Dass,et al.  Ontology and Quantum Mechanics , 2014, 1406.4933.

[413]  D. Wallace Decoherence and its role in the modern measurement problem , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[414]  Joshua Rosaler Interpretation neutrality in the classical domain of quantum theory , 2015, 1511.06383.

[415]  K. Knuth Information-based physics: an observer-centric foundation , 2013, 1310.1667.

[416]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[417]  D. J. Baker,et al.  Against Field Interpretations of Quantum Field Theory , 2009, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[418]  N. Maxwell Could Inelastic Interactions Induce Quantum Probabilistic Transitions , 2018, 1806.00622.

[419]  Caslav Brukner,et al.  Information and Fundamental Elements of the Structure of Quantum Theory , 2002, quant-ph/0212084.

[420]  K. Svozil Unscrambling the Quantum Omelette , 2012, 1206.6024.

[421]  J. Cramer The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Nonlocality , 2015, 1503.00039.

[422]  Louis Vervoort Are Hidden-Variable Theories for Pilot-Wave Systems Possible? , 2018, Foundations of Physics.

[423]  Raffaele Romano,et al.  Is a description deeper than the quantum one possible? , 2014, 1501.04127.

[424]  J. Bell On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox , 1964 .

[425]  R. Maleeh Bohr’s Philosophy in the Light of Peircean Pragmatism , 2015 .

[426]  C. Moyer Time in Quantum Mechanics , 2013, 1305.5525.

[427]  Richard Dawid,et al.  Many worlds: decoherent or incoherent? , 2015, Synthese.

[428]  W. D. Muynck Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, an Empiricist Approach , 2002 .

[429]  P. Huneman,et al.  On Probabilities in Biology and Physics , 2015 .

[430]  T. Shomar Bohr as a Phenomenological Realist , 2008 .

[431]  R. Dick Quantum jumps, superpositions, and the continuous evolution of quantum states , 2017, 1703.06230.

[432]  Henk W. De Regt,et al.  Scientific understanding: truth or dare? , 2014, Synthese.

[433]  O. Lombardi,et al.  Partial Traces in Decoherence and in Interpretation: What Do Reduced States Refer to? , 2014, 1404.3264.

[434]  Peter J. Lewis In search of local beables , 2015 .

[435]  C. Wetterich Quantum mechanics from classical statistics , 2009, 0906.4919.

[436]  M. Kupczynski Quantum mechanics and modelling of physical reality . , 2018 .

[437]  C. Ronde Representational Realism, Closed Theories and the Quantum to Classical Limit , 2016, 1602.05405.

[438]  Basil J. Hiley,et al.  Quantum Trajectories: Real or Surreal? , 2018, Entropy.

[439]  H. Quevedo,et al.  Self-accelerated Universe Induced by Repulsive Effects as an Alternative to Dark Energy and Modified Gravities , 2015, 1507.06446.

[440]  Armond Duwell,et al.  Understanding quantum phenomena and quantum theories , 2018 .

[441]  M. Trassinelli Relational Quantum Mechanics and Probability , 2018, Foundations of Physics.

[442]  Probability and Relative Frequency , 2016 .

[443]  B. Cour A Locally Deterministic, Detector-Based Model of Quantum Measurement , 2014, 2104.12801.

[444]  J. Rau On quantum vs. classical probability , 2007, 0710.2119.

[445]  G. Ghirardi,et al.  On the completeness of quantum mechanics and the interpretation of the state vector , 2013, 1302.6278.

[446]  Andrei Khrennikov Towards a Field Model of Prequantum Reality , 2012 .

[447]  Marissa Giustina,et al.  Bell-inequality violation with entangled photons, free of the coincidence-time loophole , 2013, 1309.0712.

[448]  Travis Norsen,et al.  Can the wave function in configuration space be replaced by single-particle wave functions in physical space? , 2014, Synthese.

[449]  C. Rovelli ‘Space is blue and birds fly through it’ , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[450]  David Marcus Appleby,et al.  Concerning Dice and Divinity , 2007 .

[451]  Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics , 2018, 1805.10602.

[452]  Charis Anastopoulos Frequently Asked Questions About Decoherence , 2000 .

[453]  Alexia Auffeves,et al.  Violation of Bell’s inequalities in a quantum realistic framework , 2016, 1601.03966.

[454]  A. Bolotin Constructibility of the Universal Wave Function , 2015, 1512.06845.

[455]  Scott Tanona Decoherence and the Copenhagen cut , 2012, Synthese.

[456]  G. E. Romero On the Ontology of Spacetime: Substantivalism, Relationism, Eternalism, and Emergence , 2017 .

[457]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The extended Bloch representation of quantum mechanics and the hidden-measurement solution to the measurement problem , 2014, 1404.2429.

[458]  K. Landsman On the notion of free will in the Free Will Theorem , 2017 .

[459]  Kristian Camilleri Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation , 2009, Perspectives on Science.

[460]  O. Lombardi,et al.  Understanding decoherence as an irreversible process , 2018 .

[461]  H. Wiseman,et al.  Bell Nonlocality, Signal Locality and Unpredictability (or What Bohr Could Have Told Einstein at Solvay Had He Known About Bell Experiments) , 2009, 0911.2504.

[462]  A. Pati,et al.  Products of weak values: Uncertainty relations, complementarity, and incompatibility , 2016, 1603.05776.

[463]  Tian Yu Cao,et al.  Prerequisites for a Consistent Framework of Quantum Gravity , 2001 .

[464]  C. Callender The emergence and interpretation of probability in Bohmian mechanics , 2007 .

[465]  J. Vaccaro Quantum asymmetry between time and space , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[466]  A. Budiyono Is Nonlocality Responsible for the Violation of Bell’s Inequalities? , 2014, 1404.1528.

[467]  Shane Mansfield,et al.  Reality of the quantum state: Towards a stronger ψ-ontology theorem , 2014, 1412.0669.

[468]  K. Svozil Space and Time in a Quantized World , 2014, 1401.7212.

[469]  N. David Mermin,et al.  What is quantum mechanics trying to tell us , 1998, quant-ph/9801057.

[470]  A. Sciarretta A Local-Realistic Model of Quantum Mechanics Based on a Discrete Spacetime , 2017, 1712.03227.

[471]  A. Cabello Interpretations of quantum theory: A map of madness , 2015, 1509.04711.

[472]  F. Holik,et al.  No Labeling Quantum Mechanics of Indiscernible Particles , 2009, 0904.3476.

[473]  Emily Adlam,et al.  Spooky Action at a Temporal Distance , 2018, Entropy.

[474]  Stephen L. Adler,et al.  Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: A Response to P. W. Anderson , 2003 .

[475]  Mark Newman,et al.  Theoretical Understanding in Science , 2015, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[476]  R. Griffiths Consistent Quantum Theory , 2001 .

[477]  Reply to Fleming: Symmetries, observables, and the occurrence of events , 2015 .

[478]  Luis Manuel Arévalo Aguilar,et al.  A Survey of the Concept of Disturbance in Quantum Mechanics , 2019, Entropy.

[479]  The Construction of Quantum Reality , 2012 .

[480]  H. Grelland The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis And The Meaning Of Quantum Mechanics , 2006 .

[481]  Exclusion Principle and the Identity of Indiscernibles: a Response to Margenau's Argument , 2001, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[482]  F. Laloë,et al.  Surrealistic Bohmian trajectories do not occur with macroscopic pointers , 2018, The European Physical Journal D.

[483]  Jochen Szangolies,et al.  Epistemic Horizons and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , 2018, Foundations of Physics.

[484]  Louis Vervoort,et al.  Bell’s Theorem: Two Neglected Solutions , 2012, Foundations of Physics.

[485]  O. Lombardi,et al.  A Top-down View of the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics , 2017 .

[486]  Dennis Dieks,et al.  A Contextual Approach to Scientific Understanding , 2005, Synthese.

[487]  Michael J. W. Hall,et al.  Nonlocality in Bell’s Theorem, in Bohm’s Theory, and in Many Interacting Worlds Theorising , 2018, Entropy.

[488]  Jonas R. Becker Arenhart,et al.  The received view on quantum non-individuality: formal and metaphysical analysis , 2017, Synthese.

[489]  T. P. Singh Space-time from Collapse of the Wave-function , 2018, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A.

[490]  Branches in the Everett interpretation , 2014 .

[491]  J. Linnett,et al.  Quantum mechanics , 1975, Nature.

[492]  M. Seevinck Holism, physical theories and quantum mechanics☆ , 2004, quant-ph/0402047.

[493]  Andrew Schumann,et al.  Quantum non-objectivity from performativity of quantum phenomena , 2014, 1404.7077.

[494]  Bohr's Conception of the Quantum Mechanical State of a System and Its Role in the Framework of Complementarity , 2002, quant-ph/0210075.

[495]  S. Rashkovskiy Quantum mechanics without quanta: 2. The nature of the electron , 2017 .

[496]  George Neville-Neil,et al.  The observer effect , 2017, Commun. ACM.

[497]  V. Karakostas Realism and Objectivism in Quantum Mechanics , 2012, 1203.0179.

[498]  Robert Kane,et al.  The complex tapestry of free will: striving will, indeterminism and volitional streams , 2016, Synthese.

[499]  H. Perlman Quantum Mechanics is Incomplete but it is Consistent with Locality , 2017 .

[500]  Leah Henderson,et al.  Quantum reaxiomatisations and information-theoretic interpretations of quantum theory , 2018 .

[501]  Armond Duwell Re-conceiving quantum theories in terms of information-theoretic constraints , 2007 .

[502]  A. Khrennikov After Bell , 2016, 1603.08674.

[503]  Leonard Susskind,et al.  Copenhagen vs Everett, Teleportation, and ER=EPR , 2016, 1604.02589.

[504]  H. Everett "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics , 1957 .

[505]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Bell-Boole Inequality: Nonlocality or Probabilistic Incompatibility of Random Variables? , 2008, Entropy.

[506]  A. Plotnitsky What is complementarity?: Niels Bohr and the architecture of quantum theory , 2014 .

[507]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell's Theorem with Entangled Photons. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[508]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Event-Ready Bell Test Using Entangled Atoms Simultaneously Closing Detection and Locality Loopholes. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[509]  O. Darrigol ‘Shut up and contemplate!’: Lucien Hardy׳s reasonable axioms for quantum theory , 2015 .

[510]  Daniel A. Wilkenfeld,et al.  Understanding as representation manipulability , 2011, Synthese.

[512]  Jan Hilgevoord,et al.  Time in quantum mechanics: a story of confusion , 2005 .

[513]  Alisa Bokulich,et al.  Can Classical Structures Explain Quantum Phenomena? , 2008, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[514]  D. Sudarsky,et al.  Interpretations of Quantum Theory in the Light of Modern Cosmology , 2014, 1412.7576.

[515]  Y. Aharonov,et al.  Interaction-Free Effects Between Distant Atoms , 2016, Foundations of Physics.

[516]  E. Brändas There Are Quantum Jumps , 2015 .

[517]  A. Tosi,et al.  Determining the quantum expectation value by measuring a single photon , 2017, Nature Physics.

[518]  W. V. Camp Explaining understanding (or understanding explanation) , 2014 .

[519]  B. W. Roberts A general perspective on time observables , 2014, 1404.4961.

[520]  J. Arenhart Ontological Frameworks for Scientific Theories , 2012 .

[521]  Samuel C. Fletcher What counts as a Newtonian system? The view from Norton’s dome , 2012 .

[522]  G. E. Romero Mario Bunge on Gravitational Waves and the Reality of Spacetime , 2018 .

[523]  B. Svensson Quantum Weak Values and Logic: An Uneasy Couple , 2016, 1605.03023.

[524]  I. Bialynicki-Birula PHOTON AS A QUANTUM PARTICLE , 2006 .

[525]  D. Bedingham Collapse models and spacetime symmetries , 2016, 1612.09470.

[526]  J. Golosz Weak Interactions: Asymmetry of Time or Asymmetry in Time? , 2017 .

[527]  C. Moyer Timelines and Quantum Time Operators , 2015 .

[528]  C. Feinstein Why do We Live in a Quantum World , 2016 .

[529]  H. Hofmann,et al.  On the relation between measurement outcomes and physical properties , 2016, 1603.06291.

[530]  E. Nahmad-Achar,et al.  Quantum Locality, Rings a Bell?: Bell’s Inequality Meets Local Reality and True Determinism , 2016, 1605.08493.

[531]  James Read In defence of Everettian decision theory , 2018, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.

[532]  T. Nieuwenhuizen,et al.  Is the Contextuality Loophole Fatal for the Derivation of Bell Inequalities? , 2011 .

[533]  Peter J. Lewis Quantum Ontology: A Guide to the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics , 2016 .

[534]  N. Costa,et al.  Quantum Mechanics: Ontology Without Individuals , 2014 .

[535]  Junde Wu,et al.  Outline of a Generalization and a Reinterpretation of Quantum Mechanics Recovering Objectivity , 2014, 1402.4394.

[536]  Dimension and Illusion , 2010 .

[537]  David Maccallum,et al.  Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony , 1996 .

[538]  Olivier Darrigol,et al.  Le monde quantique , 2014 .

[539]  J. Maziero A relação de incerteza de Maccone-Pati , 2017 .

[540]  C. Beisbart A Humean Guide to Spielraum Probabilities , 2016 .

[541]  M. Esfeld Ontic structural realism and the interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2013 .

[542]  Juha Saatsi,et al.  Replacing recipe realism , 2017, Synthese.

[543]  Doreen Fraser The fate of 'particles' in quantum field theories with interactions , 2008 .

[544]  O. Lombardi,et al.  A general theoretical framework for decoherence in open and closed systems , 2008, 0907.1337.

[545]  M. Schlosshauer Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics , 2003, quant-ph/0312059.