First Year Computer Science and IT Students' Experience of Participation in the Discipline

Previous research in STEM education demonstrates that students are engaged in a continuous process of identity development, trying to integrate their educational experiences with their perception of who they are, and who they wish to become. It appears increasingly apparent from this body of research that students are not well supported in this process by the education they currently receive. The goal of this paper is to analyse a specific aspect of the student experience, participation, in order to gain a better understanding of how computer science (CS) and information technology (IT) students engage with CS prior to and during their studies. Drawing on student interview data we describe and discuss students' qualitatively different ways of experiencing participation in CS and IT. The notion of participation applied here is inspired by Wenger's notion of participation in his social theory of learning. A phenomenographic analysis identifies a spectrum of qualitatively distinct ways in which the students experience participation in CS and IT, ranging from "using", to participation as "continuous development", and "creating new knowledge".

[1]  Arnold Pears,et al.  Engagement in Computer Science and IT -- What! A Matter of Identity? , 2013, 2013 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering.

[2]  Jan Nespor,et al.  Knowledge In Motion : Space, Time And Curriculum In Undergraduate Physics And Management , 2014 .

[3]  J. Charon,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: An Introduction, an Interpretation, an Integration , 1981 .

[4]  Richard Anderson,et al.  Viewpoints from the doorstep: pre-major interest in and perceptions of computer science , 2008 .

[5]  Carsten Schulte,et al.  Attitudes towards computer science-computing experiences as a starting point and barrier to computer science , 2007, ICER '07.

[6]  Henriette Tolstrup Holmegaard,et al.  Weaving a Bridge of Sense: Students' Narrative Constructions as a Lens for Understanding Students' Coping with the Gap between Expectancies and Experiences When Entering Higher Education , 2013 .

[7]  Henriette Tolstrup Holmegaard,et al.  The Process of Choosing What to Study: A Longitudinal Study of Upper Secondary Students' Identity Work When Choosing Higher Education , 2014 .

[8]  Henriette Tolstrup Holmegaard,et al.  What do we know about explanations for drop out/opt out among young people from STM higher education programmes? , 2010 .

[9]  Anna Danielsson,et al.  Doing Physics--doing Gender: An Exploration of Physics Students' Identity Constitution in the Context of Laboratory Work , 2009 .

[10]  Henriette Tolstrup Holmegaard,et al.  WHY STUDENTS CHOOSE (NOT) TO STUDY ENGINEERING , 2010 .

[11]  Anders Berglund,et al.  What does it take to learn 'programming thinking'? , 2005, ICER '05.

[12]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[13]  Lois W. Sayrs Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[14]  Christina Björkman,et al.  Crossing Boundaries, Focusing Foundations, Trying Translations : Feminist Technoscience Strategies in Computer Science , 2005 .

[15]  Matti Tedre,et al.  The development of computer science: a sociocultural perspective , 2006, Baltic Sea '06.

[16]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[17]  Maria Knobelsdorf Biographische Lern- und Bildungsprozesse im Handlungskontext der Computernutzung , 2011 .