Performance scaling comparison for free-space optical and electrical interconnection approaches.

Projected performance metrics of free-space optical and electrical interconnections are estimated and compared in terms of smart-pixel input-output bandwidth density and practical geometric packaging constraints. The results suggest that three-dimensional optical interconnects based on smart pixels provide the highest volume, latency, and power-consumption benefits for applications in which globally interconnected networks are required to implement links across many integrated-circuit chips. It is further shown that interconnection approaches based on macro-optical elements achieve better scaling than those based on micro-optical elements. The scaling limits of micro-optical-based architectures stem from the need for repeaters to overcome diffraction losses in multichip architectures with high bisection bandwidth. The overall results provide guidance in determining whether and how strongly a free-space optical interconnection approach can be applied to a given multiprocessor problem.

[1]  George Tyras,et al.  Irradiance from an Aperture with a Truncated-Gaussian Field Distribution , 1971 .

[2]  H. S. Hinton,et al.  Microbeam Optical Interconnection using Microlens Arrays , 1992 .

[3]  R A Athale,et al.  Folded perfect shuffle optical processor. , 1988, Applied optics.

[4]  J. Van Campenhout,et al.  Three-dimensional optoelectronic architectures for massively parallel processing systems , 1997 .

[5]  T Kurokawa,et al.  Performance comparison between multiple-quantum-well modulator-based and vertical-cavity-surface-emitting laser-based smart pixels. , 1996, Applied optics.

[6]  L D Dickson,et al.  Characteristics of a propagating gaussian beam. , 1970, Applied optics.

[7]  C C Guest,et al.  Comparison between electrical and free space optical interconnects for fine grain processor arrays based on interconnect density capabilities. , 1989, Applied optics.

[8]  THE SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS. , 1883, Science.

[9]  K H Brenner,et al.  Optical implementations of the perfect shuffle interconnection. , 1988, Applied optics.

[10]  Michael W. Haney,et al.  Two-bounce free-space arbitrary interconnection architecture , 1997, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Massively Parallel Processing Using Optical Interconnections.

[11]  Y Li,et al.  Compact optical generalized perfect shuffle. , 1987, Applied optics.

[12]  Michael W. Haney,et al.  Experimental evaluation of the 3-D optical shuffle interconnection module of the sliding Banyan architecture , 1996 .

[13]  Harold S. Stone,et al.  Parallel Processing with the Perfect Shuffle , 1971, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[14]  A. Lohmann.  What classical optics can do for the digital optical computer. , 1986, Applied optics.

[15]  H. S. Hinton,et al.  Optical interconnections using microlens arrays , 1992 .

[16]  Michael W. Haney,et al.  Fundamental geometric advantages of free-space optical interconnects , 1996, Proceedings of Massively Parallel Processing Using Optical Interconnections.

[17]  D Chariot,et al.  Ellipsometric data processing: an efficient method and an analysis of the relative errors; erratum. , 1987, Applied optics.

[18]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  Book Review: Introduction to Parallel Algorithms and Architectures : Arrays, Trees, Hypercubes by F. T. Leighton (Morgan Kauffman Pub, 1992) , 1992, SIGA.

[19]  F. Leighton,et al.  Introduction to Parallel Algorithms and Architectures: Arrays, Trees, Hypercubes , 1991 .

[20]  J. P. Crenn,et al.  Changes in the characteristics of a Gaussian beam weakly diffracted by a circular aperture. , 1982, Applied optics.

[21]  Thomas F. Krile,et al.  2-D Optical Multistage Interconnection Networks , 1987, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[22]  A. A. Sawchuk,et al.  Geometries For Optical Implementations Of The Perfect Shuffle , 1989, Other Conferences.