Gender in Science and Engineering Faculties: Demographic Inertia Revisited

The under-representation of women on faculties of science and engineering is ascribed in part to demographic inertia, which is the lag between retirement of current faculty and future hires. The assumption of demographic inertia implies that, given enough time, gender parity will be achieved. We examine that assumption via a semi-Markov model to predict the future faculty, with simulations that predict the convergence demographic state. Our model shows that existing practices that produce gender gaps in recruitment, retention, and career progression preclude eventual gender parity. Further, we examine sensitivity of the convergence state to current gender gaps to show that all sources of disparity across the entire faculty career must be erased to produce parity: we cannot blame demographic inertia.

[1]  Yonghong Jade Xu,et al.  Faculty Turnover: Discipline-Specific Attention is Warranted , 2008 .

[2]  C. Hill,et al.  Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. , 2010 .

[3]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[4]  Kerryann O'Meara,et al.  Engendering Faculty Professional Growth , 2010 .

[5]  M. Faculty,et al.  Gender differences at critical transitions in the careers of science, engineering, and mathematics faculty , 2010 .

[6]  J. Bentley,et al.  Gender Differences in the Careers of Academic Scientists and Engineers: A Literature Review. Special Report. , 2003 .

[7]  Allison K Shaw,et al.  Leaks in the pipeline: separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  S. Ceci,et al.  National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  C. Geisler,et al.  Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention in Science and Engineering by Gender , 2012, Science.

[10]  Kim Vanderlinden,et al.  Faculty in the Middle Years: Illuminating an Overlooked Phase of Academic Life , 2005 .

[11]  G Morton,et al.  Why so slow? , 2003, Anaesthesia.

[12]  S. Ceci,et al.  Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  S. Laursen,et al.  Demographic Inertia Revisited: An Immodest Proposal to Achieve Equitable Gender Representation among Faculty in Higher Education , 2007 .

[14]  M. Graham,et al.  Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  C. Trower,et al.  Success on the Tenure Track: Five Keys to Faculty Job Satisfaction , 2012 .

[16]  Amanda V. Bakian,et al.  The Effectiveness of Institutional Intervention on Minimizing Demographic Inertia and Improving the Representation of Women Faculty in Higher Education , 2010 .

[17]  A. Leskes,et al.  Leading through a Perfect Storm. , 2006 .

[18]  M. Nerad,et al.  Onto, Up, Off the Academic Faculty Ladder: The Gendered Effects of Family on Career Transitions for a Cohort of Social Science Ph.D.s , 2011 .

[19]  Anna Neumann,et al.  Professing to Learn: Creating Tenured Lives and Careers in the American Research University , 2009 .

[20]  M. Mason,et al.  Do Babies Matter?: Gender and Family in the Ivory Tower , 2013 .

[21]  Deborah DeZure,et al.  Mapping the Terrain of Mid-Career Faculty at a Research University: Implications for Faculty and Academic Leaders , 2008 .

[22]  S. Adamo.  Attrition of Women in the Biological Sciences: Workload, Motherhood, and Other Explanations Revisited , 2013 .

[23]  Demographic Inertia and Women's Representation Among Faculty in Higher Education , 2002 .

[24]  Shulamit Kahn,et al.  Does Science Promote Women? Evidence from Academia 1973-2001 , 2006 .

[25]  S. Ceci,et al.  Women in Academic Science , 2014, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.