Re-imagining the city: branding migration-related diversity

ABSTRACT How do superdiverse cities re-imagine themselves in response to migration-related diversity? Based on a double case study on the branding strategies of two superdiverse Dutch cities, Amsterdam and Rotterdam, this paper shows that although diversity is part of the brand identity in both cities, it is not used prominently in urban planning or brand communications. Migration-related diversity is re-defined strategically (as ‘cosmopolitan’ and ‘international’) for two reasons: (1) to turn it into an asset that enhances the brand, and (2) to align the brand with existing policies and political discourses on migration and accommodate political pressures. City marketers have depoliticized place branding. Marketing logic pushed migration-related diversity to the background, because according to the city marketers diversity does not help a city to stand out. There is limited interaction between spatial planners and city marketers, and marketers use spatial planning selectively in place branding.

[1]  S. Vertovec.  Super-diversity and its implications , 2007, Celebrating 40 Years of Ethnic and Racial Studies.

[2]  P. Scholten,et al.  The Routledge Handbook of the Governance of Migration and Diversity in Cities , 2018 .

[3]  Inès Hassen,et al.  The difference of ‘being diverse’: City branding and multiculturalism in the ‘Leicester Model’ , 2017, Cities.

[4]  P. Groote,et al.  Patterns of place promotion, place marketing and/or place branding in Dutch municipalities , 2017 .

[5]  T. Caponio.  Immigrant integration beyond national policies? Italian cities’ participation in European city networks , 2017 .

[6]  P. Scholten,et al.  Theorizing the ‘local turn’ in a multi-level governance framework of analysis: a case study in immigrant policies , 2017 .

[7]  Erik Braun,et al.  Branding the destination versus the place: The effects of brand complexity and identification for residents and visitors , 2017 .

[8]  Martin de Jong,et al.  City branding in polycentric urban regions: identification, profiling and transformation in the Randstad and Rhine-Ruhr , 2016 .

[9]  Ida Andersson.  ‘Green cities’ going greener? Local environmental policy-making and place branding in the ‘Greenest City in Europe’ , 2016 .

[10]  Staci M. Zavattaro,et al.  Bridging the gap: An exploration of how DMO managers use education to overcome challenges , 2016 .

[11]  Maurice Crul,et al.  Super-diversity vs. assimilation: how complex diversity in majority–minority cities challenges the assumptions of assimilation , 2016 .

[12]  E. Henrique,et al.  University of Groningen Place branding in strategic spatial planning , 2016 .

[13]  S. Overman.  Great Expectations of Autonomous Agencies , 2016 .

[14]  Eduardo Oliveira.  Place branding in strategic spatial planning: A content analysis of development plans, strategic initiatives and policy documents for Portugal 2014-2020 , 2015 .

[15]  G. Ashworth,et al.  The Need to Rethink Place Branding , 2015 .

[16]  G. Ashworth,et al.  Rethinking place branding: Comprehensive brand development for cities and regions , 2015 .

[17]  Andrea Lucarelli.  The Political Dimension of Place Branding , 2015 .

[18]  H. Leitner,et al.  Planning in the multicultural city: Celebrating diversity or reinforcing difference? , 2014 .

[19]  Cecilia Pasquinelli.  Branding as Urban Collective Strategy-making: The Formation of NewcastleGateshead’s Organisational Identity , 2014 .

[20]  J. Duyvendak,et al.  New York and Amsterdam: Immigration and the New Urban Landscape , 2014 .

[21]  Peter Scholten,et al.  Agenda dynamics and the multi-level governance of intractable policy controversies: the case of migrant integration policies in the Netherlands , 2013 .

[22]  A. Winter.  Race, Multiculturalism and the ‘Progressive’ Politics of London 2012: Passing the ‘Boyle Test’ , 2013 .

[23]  M. Hatch,et al.  The dynamics of place brands , 2013 .

[24]  Ted Cantle.  Interculturalism: The New Era of Cohesion and Diversity , 2012 .

[25]  S. Musterd,et al.  Towards Social Cohesion: Bridging National Integration Rhetoric and Local Practice: The Case of the Netherlands , 2012 .

[26]  J. Eshuis,et al.  Branding in Governance and Public Management , 2011 .

[27]  K. van Assche,et al.  Planning, preservation and place branding: A tale of sharing assets and narratives , 2011 .

[28]  M. Silk,et al.  Olympic Bidding, Multicultural Nationalism, Terror, and the Epistemological Violence of ‘Making Britain Proud’ , 2010 .

[29]  G. Ashworth.  The Instruments of Place Branding: How is it Done? , 2009 .

[30]  Nina Glick Schiller,et al.  Towards a Comparative Theory of Locality in Migration Studies: Migrant Incorporation and City Scale , 2009 .

[31]  S. Thiel,et al.  Political Influence and Bureaucratic Autonomy , 2008 .

[32]  J. Uitermark,et al.  Civilising the City: Populism and Revanchist Urbanism in Rotterdam , 2008 .

[33]  M. Kavaratzis.  From city marketing to city branding , 2006 .

[34]  J. Uitermark,et al.  Reinventing multiculturalism, urban citizenship and the negotiation of ethnic diversity in Amsterdam , 2005 .

[35]  B. Nyatanga.  Celebrating cultural diversity. , 2001, International journal of palliative nursing.

[36]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches , 1966 .

[37]  Ronan Paddison,et al.  City Marketing, Image Reconstruction and Urban Regeneration , 1993 .

[38]  Philip Kotler,et al.  The Major Tasks of Marketing Management , 1973 .