The Third-Person Perception as Social Judgment

Although numerous studies have shown the third-person perception, explanation of why and how self-other perceptual gaps occur remains underdeveloped. Conceiving message-effect perceptions as a form of social judgment under varying degrees of uncertainty, this study attempts to demonstrate the responsiveness of the perceptual gap to information on message effectiveness and to explicate the uncertainty-reduction interpretation of social distance corollary. Analyzing data from a survey and an experiment, this study finds that credible information on overall message ineffectiveness leads to reductions in estimated effects of the messages on both self and various others and in self-other perceptual gaps when the other is most distant from self. Consistent with the uncertainty reduction argument, the self-other perceptual gaps are related to perceived similarity of the others and vary in response to labels of the others that cue different degrees of similarity with self. Directions for future studies and practical implications are discussed.

[1]  W. Davison The Third-Person Effect in Communication , 1983 .

[2]  C. Macrae,et al.  Social cognition: thinking categorically about others. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  FOR THE GOOD OF OTHERS: CENSORSHIP AND THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT , 1996 .

[4]  Efrat Neter,et al.  The effect of motivation of judgment depends on the difficulty of the judgment. , 1995 .

[5]  J. Innes,et al.  The public's view of the impact of the mass media: A test of the ‘third person’ effect , 1988 .

[6]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Dual-Process Models in Social and Cognitive Psychology: Conceptual Integration and Links to Underlying Memory Systems , 2000 .

[7]  Julie M. Duck,et al.  The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third person effect , 1995 .

[8]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  Biased Optimism and the Third-Person Effect , 1993 .

[9]  J. Bryant,et al.  Media effects : advances in theory and research , 2002 .

[10]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Behind the Third-Person Effect: Differentiating Perceptual Processes for Self and Other , 2001 .

[11]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Lay Theories: Everyday Understanding of Problems in the Social Sciences , 1988 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Evidential impact of base rates , 1981 .

[13]  Vera Hoorens,et al.  The optimal impact phenomenon : beyond the third person effect , 1996 .

[14]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[15]  Nicholas A. Valentino,et al.  Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate? , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[16]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  Overrating the X‐Rating: The Third‐Person Perception and Support for Censorship of Pornography , 1995 .

[17]  Esther Thorson,et al.  Perceived Persuasive Effects of Product Commercials and Public Service Announcements , 1992 .

[18]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[19]  Colin B. Grant,et al.  Uncertainty and Communication , 2007 .

[20]  Larry M. Bartels Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice , 1988 .

[21]  T. Mussweiler Comparison processes in social judgment: mechanisms and consequences. , 2003, Psychological review.

[22]  D. Dunning,et al.  Self-serving prototypes of social categories. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Rethinking the Social Distance Corollary , 1999 .

[24]  Prabu David,et al.  Social Distance and Social Identification in Third-Person Effects , 2002 .

[25]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[26]  K. Goldstein,et al.  Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads , 1999 .

[27]  Prabu David,et al.  Methodological Artifact or Persistent Bias? , 2004, Commun. Res..

[28]  W. Phillips Davison,et al.  THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT REVISITED , 1996 .

[29]  B. Paul,et al.  The Third-Person Effect: A Meta-Analysis of the Perceptual Hypothesis , 2000 .

[30]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  PERCEIVED IMPACT OF DEFAMATION AN EXPERIMENT ON THIRD-PERSON EFFECTS , 1988 .

[31]  John R. Chapin,et al.  Third-Person Perception and Optimistic Bias Among Urban Minority At-Risk Youth , 2000, Commun. Res..

[32]  A. Tversky,et al.  Variants of uncertainty , 1982, Cognition.

[33]  Arie W. Kruglanski Knowledge as a social psychological construct. , 1988 .

[34]  M. Biernat,et al.  Simultaneous assimilation and contrast effects in judgments of self and others. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification , 1999 .

[36]  J. Cappella,et al.  Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good , 1997 .

[37]  Jeremy Cohen,et al.  Third-Person Effects and the Differential Impact in Negative Political Advertising , 1991 .

[38]  Jeffrey E. Danes,et al.  Social Judgment Theory , 1984 .

[39]  Matthew Alan Cahn,et al.  Public Policy: The Essential Readings , 1994 .

[40]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Exemplar-Based Model of Social Judgment , 1992 .

[41]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  The Perceived Influence of AIDS Advertising: Third-Person Effects in the Context of Positive Media Content , 1995 .

[42]  Larry Sabato,et al.  Feeding frenzy : how attack journalism has transformed American politics , 1991 .

[43]  Charles T. Salmon,et al.  THE ‘OTHER’ AS THE VULNERABLE VOTER: A STUDY OF THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT IN THE 1988 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN , 1990 .

[44]  David H Tewksbury,et al.  Third-person effects on publication of a holocaust-denial advertisement , 1998 .

[45]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Support for Censorship of Violent and Misogynic Rap Lyrics , 1997 .

[46]  David H Tewksbury,et al.  Third-Person Effects of News Coverage: Orientations Toward Media , 1997 .

[47]  David Dunning,et al.  Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment , 1996 .

[48]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[49]  Joseph N. Cappella,et al.  Bridging the Disciplinary Divide , 1996, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[50]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Classic and Current Social Comparison Research : Expanding the Perspective , 1990 .

[51]  E. Higgins,et al.  Handbook of motivation and cognition : foundations of social behavior , 1991 .

[52]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[53]  Melvin J. Voigt,et al.  Progress in Communication Sciences , 1982 .

[54]  N. Weinstein Unrealistic optimism about future life events , 1980 .

[55]  Craig Leonard Brians,et al.  Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer? , 1996, American Political Science Review.

[56]  A. Gunther,et al.  The Influence of Presumed Influence , 2003 .

[57]  BENGT JOHANSSON,et al.  The Third-Person Effect , 2005 .

[58]  Michael Elwood Roloff,et al.  Interpersonal Processes: New Directions in Communication Research , 1987 .

[59]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Social Cognition , 1999 .

[60]  June A. Flora,et al.  Third-Person Perception and Children , 1999 .

[61]  E. Higgins Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[62]  Prabu David,et al.  The role of self in third‐person effects about body image , 1998 .

[63]  James Price Dillard,et al.  The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice , 2002 .

[64]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[65]  L. Perloff,et al.  Self–other judgments and perceived vulnerability to victimization. , 1986 .

[66]  Dane K. Peterson,et al.  Confidence, uncertainty, and the use of information , 1988 .

[67]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation , 1990 .

[68]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  The Heuristic-Systematic Model of Social Information Processing , 2002 .

[69]  Hans-Bernd Brosius,et al.  THE CAUSES OF THIRD-PERSON EFFECTS: UNREALISTIC OPTIMISM, IMPERSONAL IMPACT, OR GENERALIZED NEGATIVE ATTITUDES TOWARDS MEDIA INFLUENCE? , 1996 .

[70]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate , 1995 .

[71]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason , 1997 .

[72]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  8 – Lay Theories in Law , 1988 .

[73]  David H Tewksbury The Role of Comparison Group Size in the Third‐Person Effect , 2002 .

[74]  Kathleen Hall Jamieson,et al.  Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy , 1992 .

[75]  Patrick C. Meirick Topic-Relevant Reference Groups and Dimensions of Distance , 2004, Commun. Res..

[76]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Perceived self–other differences in persuasibility: The effects of interpersonal and group‐based similarity , 1998 .

[77]  Richard R. Lau,et al.  The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment , 1999, American Political Science Review.