Impedance cardiography as tool for continuous hemodynamic monitoring during cesarean section: randomized, prospective double blind study

BackgroundImpedance Cardiography (ICG) is a non-invasive tool for continuous hemodynamic monitoring. Aims of our study were to assess the utility of ICG to evaluate the hemodynamic impact of 6 mg (GL6) vs 8 mg (GL8) levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl in healthy patients undergoing elective cesarean section; secondary, to compare the duration and quality of analgesia and anesthesia.MethodsSixty-two women receiving combined spinal-epidural (CSE) for elective cesarean delivery were randomly allocated to GL6 or GL8 groups. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), heart rate (HR), stroke volume index (SVI) were recorded from Tbaseline to 31 min after CSE by ICG. Sensory and motor blocks, patients and surgeons satisfaction, neonatal data were also recorded.ResultsFifteen of 32 patients in GL6 and 15 of 30 patients in GL8 experienced hypotension at T2 vs Tbaseline (P < .001) and SVRI reduction (P = .035 and P < .001 respectively). MAP, CI and SVRI were always slightly higher in GL6 vs GL8. HR and SVI remained stable until the end of surgery in all patients. Total ephedrine requirements was higher in GL8 (P = .010). The onset and offset time of sensory and motor block were similar in both groups, but the number of patients with motor block was lower in GL6 vs GL8 (P = .001). Patients and surgeon satisfaction scores, the number of patients needed systemic rescue doses, neonatal data were similar in both groups.ConclusionsICG is a useful noninvasive tool to monitor continuously hemodynamics during cesarean section. The hemodynamic stability, the satisfying sensory block and rapid mobilization provided by low levobupivacaine dose may be particularly advantageous in obstetric patients.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03170427. Retrospectively Registered (Date of registration: May 2017).

[1]  H. Dent,et al.  Maternal and fetal haemodynamic effects of spinal and extradural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. , 1992, British journal of anaesthesia.

[2]  Y. T. Zhang,et al.  Impedance cardiography for cuffless and non-invasive measurement of systolic blood pressure , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  P. Bromage,et al.  QUALITY OF EPIDURAL BLOCKADE. I. INFLUENCE OF PHYSICAL FACTORS. , 1964, British journal of anaesthesia.

[4]  R. Dyer,et al.  Maternal haemodynamic changes during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section , 2011, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[5]  Gerard Cybulski,et al.  Impedance cardiography: recent advancements. , 2012, Cardiology journal.

[6]  C. Chooi,et al.  Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  A. Sargın,et al.  A randomized comparison of different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl for elective cesarean section: prospective, double-blinded study , 2011, Journal of Anesthesia.

[8]  A. Hasanin,et al.  Leg elevation decreases the incidence of post-spinal hypotension in cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial , 2017, BMC Anesthesiology.

[9]  Joseph F. Burkard,et al.  Effect of timing of fluid bolus on reduction of spinal-induced hypotension in patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. , 2009, AANA journal.

[10]  Goutham Talari,et al.  A randomized controlled prospective study comparing a low dose bupivacaine and fentanyl mixture to a conventional dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine for cesarean section , 2015, Saudi journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  J. Martin,et al.  Maternal Hemodynamics by Thoracic Impedance Cardiography for Normal Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period , 2014 .

[12]  M. Cannesson,et al.  Clinical review: Does it matter which hemodynamic monitoring system is used? , 2013, Critical Care.

[13]  P. Rosenberg,et al.  Maximum Recommended Doses of Local Anesthetics: A Multifactorial Concept , 2004, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[14]  B. Zwissler,et al.  [Levobupivacaine for parturients undergoing elective caesarean delivery. A dose-finding investigation]. , 2007, Der Anaesthesist.

[15]  A. Khalil,et al.  Maternal Cardiovascular Function in Normal Pregnancy: Evidence of Maladaptation to Chronic Volume Overload. , 2016, Hypertension.

[16]  A. Yli-Hankala,et al.  Maternal hemodynamics during cesarean delivery assessed by whole‐body impedance cardiography , 2005, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[17]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Vasopressors in obstetric anesthesia: A current perspective. , 2015, World journal of clinical cases.

[18]  S. Ma,et al.  Hotly debated topics in obstetric anesthesiology 2008: A theory of relativity , 2008 .

[19]  T. Seto,et al.  Non-invasive Cardiac Monitoring in Pregnancy: Impedance Cardiography versus Echocardiography , 2013, Journal of Perinatology.

[20]  M. Dambrosio,et al.  Continuous spinal analgesia with levobupivacaine for postoperative pain management: Comparison of 0.125% versus 0.0625% in elective total knee and hip replacement: A double-blind randomized study , 2015, Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology.

[21]  Kim S. Khaw,et al.  Prevention of Hypotension during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: An Effective Technique Using Combination Phenylephrine Infusion and Crystalloid Cohydration , 2005, Anesthesiology.

[22]  B. Zwissler,et al.  Levobupivacain zur Spinalanästhesie bei der Sectio caesarea , 2007, Der Anaesthesist.

[23]  M. Dambrosio,et al.  Combined Sequential Spinal Epidural Anesthesia: A Prospective Study , 2012 .

[24]  B. Allaouchiche,et al.  ED₅₀ and ED₉₅ of intrathecal levobupivacaine with opioids for Caesarean delivery. , 2011, British journal of anaesthesia.

[25]  P. Asfar,et al.  Mean arterial pressure target in patients with septic shock. , 2016, Minerva anestesiologica.

[26]  A. Many,et al.  Casting doubt on the value of assessing the cardiac index in pregnancy , 2018, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[27]  T. Mashimo,et al.  Effects of crystalloid and colloid preload on blood volume in the parturient undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[28]  Katarina Pavičić Dokoza,et al.  Spinal anesthesia at the L2-3 and L3-4 levels: comparison of analgesia and hemodynamic response. , 2012, Collegium antropologicum.

[29]  M. Dambrosio,et al.  The anaesthetic and recovery profile of two concentrations (0.25% and 0.50%), of intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine for combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anaesthesia in patients undergoing modified Stark method caesarean delivery: a double blinded randomized trial. , 2013, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[30]  F. Mercier,et al.  Maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for caesarean delivery. , 2013, Minerva anestesiologica.

[31]  A. Habib A Review of the Impact of Phenylephrine Administration on Maternal Hemodynamics and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia , 2012, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[32]  P Middleton,et al.  Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[33]  D. Birnbach,et al.  Hotly debated topics in obstetric anesthesiology 2008: a theory of relativity. , 2008, Minerva anestesiologica.

[34]  J. Rutherford,et al.  Cardiovascular physiology of pregnancy. , 2014, Circulation.

[35]  R. Rossaint,et al.  Definitions of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: literature search and application to parturients , 2010, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[36]  G. Capogna,et al.  Sensory assessment of epidural block for Caesarean section: a systematic comparison of pinprick, cold and touch sensation , 2006, European journal of anaesthesiology.