Survivor needs or logistical convenience? Factors shaping decisions to deliver relief to earthquake-affected communities, Pakistan 2005-06.

In Bureaucratizing the Good Samaritan, Waters (2001) argues that bureaucratic rationality distracts humanitarian agencies from the needs of the people they are supposed to assist, in favour of other values that their institutional frameworks dictate. We test his claim by investigating the response to the Pakistan 2005 earthquake. One of us (Dittemore) worked with the United Nations Joint Logistics Centre in the theatre, managing a relief cargo shipment database. The response, known as 'Operation Winter Race', was hampered by extreme logistical challenges, but ultimately succeeded in averting a second disaster resulting from cold and starvation. We use statistical models to probe whether survivor needs significantly guided decisions to deliver relief to affected communities. Needs assessments remained incomplete and incoherent. We measure needs through proxy indicators and integrate them, on a Geographic Information System (GIS) platform, with logistics and relief delivery data. We find that, despite strong logistics effects, needs orientations were significant. However, the strength of decision factors varies between commodity types (food versus clothing and shelter versus reconstruction materials) as well as over the different phases of the response. This study confirms Thomas's observation that logistics databases are rich 'repositories of data that can be analyzed to provide post-event learning' (Thomas, 2003, p. 4). This article is an invitation for others to engage in creative humanitarian data management.

[1]  Les Roberts,et al.  Assessing the impact of humanitarian assistance in the health sector , 2004, Emerging themes in epidemiology.

[2]  T. Kneib,et al.  BayesX: Analyzing Bayesian Structural Additive Regression Models , 2005 .

[3]  Linet Özdamar,et al.  Emergency Logistics Planning in Natural Disasters , 2004, Ann. Oper. Res..

[4]  Alpaslan Özerdem,et al.  The mountain Tsunami: afterthoughts on the Kashmir earthquake , 2006 .

[5]  S. Pettit,et al.  Emergency relief logistics: an evaluation of military, non-military and composite response models , 2005 .

[6]  Charles Conley,et al.  Data Fusion for Mine Action Decision Support: An Example From Lebanon , 2004 .

[7]  Fiona Terry Condemned to Repeat?: The Paradox of Humanitarian Action , 2002 .

[8]  Aldo A Benini,et al.  Integration of different data bodies for humanitarian decision support: an example from mine action. , 2003, Disasters.

[9]  Stephen A. Kotleba,et al.  Inventory modelling for complex emergencies in humanitarian relief operations , 2006 .

[10]  A A Benini,et al.  Uncertainty and information flows in humanitarian agencies. , 1997, Disasters.

[11]  Geir Teigland,et al.  Motives in Development Policy, whose are they really? -A study of the administration's role in Norwegian development policy , 2005 .

[12]  John Cosgrave,et al.  The international humanitarian system and the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunamis. , 2007, Disasters.

[13]  J. Lanjouw,et al.  Micro-Level Estimation of Welfare , 2002 .

[14]  Max Stephenson,et al.  Making humanitarian relief networks more effective: operational coordination, trust and sense making. , 2005, Disasters.

[15]  T. E. Russell The humanitarian relief supply chain : analysis of the 2004 South East Asia earthquake and Tsunami , 2005 .

[16]  Quentin Wodon,et al.  The Allocation of Natural Disaster Relief Funds: Hurricane Mitch in Honduras , 2003 .

[17]  William A. Niskanen,et al.  Bureaucracy and Public Economics , 1994 .

[18]  Y. Barzel,et al.  Measurement Cost and the Organization of Markets , 1982, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[19]  Langche Zeng,et al.  Analyzing Censored and Sample-Selected Data with Tobit and Heckit Models , 1999, Political Analysis.

[20]  L. Minear,et al.  The Charity of Nations: Humanitarian Action in a Calculating World , 2004 .