Understanding of regional air pollution over China using CMAQ, part II. Process analysis and sensitivity of ozone and particulate matter to precursor emissions

Following model evaluation inpart I, this part II paper focuses on the process analysis and chemical regime analysis for the formation of ozone (O3) and particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 10 mm (PM10) in China. The process analysis results show that horizontal transport is the main contributortothe accumulation of O3in Jan., Apr., and Oct., and gas-phase chemistryand vertical transport contribute to the production and accumulation of O3 in Jul. Removal pathways of O3 include vertical and horizontal transport, gas-phase chemistry, and cloud processes, depending on locations and seasons. PM10 is mainly produced by primary emissions and aerosol processes and removed by horizontal transport. Cloud processes could either decrease or increase PM10 concentrations, depending on locations and seasons. Among all indicators examined, the ratio of PHNO3=PH2O2 provides the most robust indicator for O3 chemistry,indicatingaVOC-limitedO3chemistryover mostof the easternChina in Jan., NOx-limitedin Jul., and either VOC- or NOx-limited in Apr. and Oct. O3 chemistry is NOx-limited in most central and western China and VOC-limitedin majorcitiesthroughout theyear.The adjustedgas ratio,AdjGR,indicates that PM formation in the eastern China is most sensitive to the emissions of SO2 and may be more sensitive to emission reductions in NOx than in NH3. These results are fairly consistent with the responses of O3

[1]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .

[2]  D. Byun Science algorithms of the EPA Models-3 community multi-scale air quality (CMAQ) modeling system , 1999 .

[3]  Zhang Yuanhang The Study of Urban Photochemical Smog Pollution in China , 1998 .

[4]  Christian Seigneur,et al.  Evaluation of three probing techniques in a three-dimensional air quality model , 2005 .

[5]  UTILIZING CMAQ PROCESS ANALYSIS TO UNDERSTAND THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON OZONE AND PARTICULATE MATTER , 2005 .

[6]  S. Sillman,et al.  The Use of Photochemical Indicators to Evaluate Ozone-NOx-Hydrocarbon Sensitivity: Case Studies from Atlanta, New York, and Los Angeles. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[7]  S. Sillman,et al.  Some theoretical results concerning O3‐NOx‐VOC chemistry and NOx‐VOC indicators , 2002 .

[8]  Christian Seigneur,et al.  Particulate Matter Modeling in the Los Angeles Basin Using SAQM-AERO , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[9]  L. Wallace,et al.  Ambient air concentrations of fine (PM2.5) manganese in U.S. national parks and in California and Canadian cities: the possible impact of adding MMT to unleaded gasoline. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[10]  Ping Liu,et al.  Use of a process analysis tool for diagnostic study on fine particulate matter predictions in the U.S.–Part II: Analyses and sensitivity simulations , 2011 .

[11]  Robin L. Dennis,et al.  Analysis of radical propagation efficiency to assess ozone sensitivity to hydrocarbons and NO x : 2. Long‐lived species as indicators of ozone concentration sensitivity , 2000 .

[12]  Harvey E. Jeffries,et al.  Sensitivity of ozone to model grid resolution — II. Detailed process analysis for ozone chemistry , 1995 .

[13]  Spyros N. Pandis,et al.  Response of Inorganic PM to Precursor Concentrations , 1998 .

[14]  J. Baldasano,et al.  Contribution of atmospheric processes affecting the dynamics of air pollution in South-Western Europe during a typical summertime photochemical episode , 2009 .

[15]  B. Lamb,et al.  Using back trajectories and process analysis to investigate photochemical ozone production in the Puget Sound region , 2003 .

[16]  Cheng-Hsuan Lu,et al.  On the indicator‐based approach to assess ozone sensitivities and emissions features , 1998 .

[17]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Probing into regional O3 and particulate matter pollution in the United States: 2. An examination of formation mechanisms through a process analysis technique and sensitivity study , 2009 .

[18]  Wang Wei,et al.  Numerical study on the impacts of heterogeneous reactions on ozone formation in the Beijing urban area , 2006 .

[19]  A study of the ozone formation by ensemble back trajectory-process analysis using the Eta–CMAQ forecast model over the northeastern U.S. during the 2004 ICARTT period , 2009 .

[20]  Nancy J. Brown,et al.  A process-analysis based study of the ozone weekend effect , 2008 .

[21]  Robin L. Dennis,et al.  Analysis of radical propagation efficiency to assess ozone sensitivity to hydrocarbons and NO x : 1. Local indicators of instantaneous odd oxygen production sensitivity , 2000 .

[22]  Donald Dabdub,et al.  Chemical Coupling Between Atmospheric Ozone and Particulate Matter , 1997 .

[23]  Joshua S. Fu,et al.  Process analysis of typical summertime ozone episodes over the Beijing area. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  David T. Allen,et al.  Application of a Lagrangian Process Analysis tool to characterize ozone formation in Southeast Texas , 2008 .

[25]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  Probing into regional ozone and particulate matter pollution in the United States: 1. A 1 year CMAQ simulation and evaluation using surface and satellite data , 2009 .

[26]  S. Sillman The use of NO y , H2O2, and HNO3 as indicators for ozone‐NO x ‐hydrocarbon sensitivity in urban locations , 1995 .

[27]  Youhua Tang,et al.  Impacts of different emission sources on air quality during March 2001 in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region , 2005 .