Cost benefits of optimizing hydrogen storage and methanation capacities for Power-to-Gas plants in dynamic operation

Power-to-Gas technologies offer a promising approach for converting renewable electricity into a molecular form (fuel) to serve the energy demands of non-electric energy applications in all end-use sectors. The technologies have been broadly developed and are at the edge of a mass roll-out. The barriers that Power-to-Gas faces are no longer technical, but are, foremost, regulatory, and economic. This study focuses on a Power-to-Gas pathway, where electricity is first converted in a water electrolyzer into hydrogen, which is then synthetized with carbon dioxide to produce synthetic natural gas. A key aspect of this pathway is that an intermittent electricity supply could be used, which could reduce the amount of electricity curtailment from renewable energy generation. Interim storages would then be necessary to decouple the synthesized part from hydrogen production, to enable (I) longer continuous operation cycles for the methanation reactor, and (II) increased annual full-load hours, leading to an overall reduction in gas production costs. This work optimizes a Power-to-Gas plant configuration with respect to the cost benefits using a Monte Carlo-based simulation tool. The results indicate potential cost reductions of up to 17% in synthetic natural gas production by implementing well-balanced components and interim storages. This study also evaluates three different power sources which differ greatly in their optimal system configuration. Results from time-resolved simulations and sensitivity analyses for different plant designs and electricity sources are discussed with respect to technical and economic implications, so as to facilitate a plant design process for decision makers.

[1]  Umberto Desideri,et al.  Opportunities of power-to-gas technology in different energy systems architectures , 2018, Applied Energy.

[2]  Ø. Ulleberg,et al.  The wind/hydrogen demonstration system at Utsira in Norway: Evaluation of system performance using operational data and updated hydrogen energy system modeling tools , 2010 .

[3]  Murat Gökçek Hydrogen generation from small-scale wind-powered electrolysis system in different power matching modes , 2010 .

[4]  T. Schildhauer,et al.  Synthetic Natural Gas from Coal, Dry Biomass, and Power-to-Gas Applications , 2016 .

[5]  Pablo Sanchis,et al.  Stand-alone operation of an alkaline water electrolyser fed by wind and photovoltaic systems , 2013 .

[6]  A. Hawkes,et al.  Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study , 2017 .

[7]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Power to Gas: Technological Overview, Systems Analysis and Economic Assessment , 2015 .

[8]  C. H. Bartholomew Mechanisms of catalyst deactivation , 2001 .

[9]  Benjamin Guinot,et al.  Profitability of an electrolysis based hydrogen production plant providing grid balancing services , 2015 .

[10]  M. Newborough,et al.  Sizing and operating power-to-gas systems to absorb excess renewable electricity , 2017 .

[11]  Jianzhong Wu,et al.  Role of power-to-gas in an integrated gas and electricity system in Great Britain , 2015 .

[12]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Early power to gas applications: Reducing wind farm forecast errors and providing secondary control reserve , 2017 .

[13]  Elimar Frank,et al.  Calculation and analysis of efficiencies and annual performances of Power-to-Gas systems , 2018 .

[14]  Christian Breyer,et al.  Power-to-Gas as an Emerging Profitable Business Through Creating an Integrated Value Chain , 2015 .

[15]  Hans Oechsner,et al.  Biological hydrogen methanation - A review. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[16]  M. Newborough,et al.  Power-to-gas systems for absorbing excess solar power in electricity distribution networks , 2016 .

[17]  Thomas Pregger,et al.  Studie über die Planung einer Demonstrationsanlage zur Wasserstoff-Kraftstoffgewinnung durch Elektrolyse mit Zwischenspeicherung in Salzkavernen unter Druck , 2015 .

[18]  Anthony Paul Roskilly,et al.  Levelised Cost of Storage for Pumped Heat Energy Storage in comparison with other energy storage technologies , 2017 .

[19]  J. P. Deane,et al.  Modelling of a power-to-gas system to predict the levelised cost of energy of an advanced renewable gaseous transport fuel , 2018 .

[20]  M. Götz,et al.  Review on methanation – From fundamentals to current projects , 2016 .

[21]  S. Miller,et al.  INTRODUCTORY REMARKS , 1952, Public health reports.

[22]  M. Mulder,et al.  Power-to-gas in electricity markets dominated by renewables , 2018, Applied Energy.

[23]  John Andrews,et al.  Direct coupling of an electrolyser to a solar PV system for generating hydrogen , 2009 .

[24]  Jihong Wang,et al.  Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation , 2015 .

[25]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  Comparative assessment of CO2 capture technologies for carbon-intensive industrial processes , 2012 .

[26]  Timo Hyppänen,et al.  A method for assessing infrastructure for CO2 utilization: A case study of Finland , 2017 .

[27]  S. K. Salman,et al.  A field application experience of integrating hydrogen technology with wind power in a remote island location , 2006 .

[28]  Christian Breyer,et al.  Transforming the electricity generation of the Berlin–Brandenburg region, Germany , 2014 .

[29]  F. Graf,et al.  Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and economic review , 2016 .

[30]  Hartmut Spliethoff,et al.  Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: A review , 2018 .

[31]  Matteo C. Romano,et al.  Power-to-gas plants and gas turbines for improved wind energy dispatchability: Energy and economic assessment , 2015 .

[32]  Hendrik Kondziella,et al.  Flexibility requirements of renewable energy based electricity systems – a review of research results and methodologies , 2016 .

[33]  Jesus Rodriguez,et al.  Influence of operation parameters in the modeling of alkaline water electrolyzers for hydrogen production , 2014 .

[34]  M. Kopp,et al.  Energiepark Mainz: Technical and economic analysis of the worldwide largest Power-to-Gas plant with PEM electrolysis , 2017 .

[35]  J. Peinke,et al.  Turbulent character of wind energy. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[36]  Peter Lund,et al.  Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity , 2015 .

[37]  Carlos Peregrina,et al.  Techno-economic and Life Cycle Assessment of methane production via biogas upgrading and power to gas technology , 2017 .

[38]  T. Tynjälä,et al.  Dynamic one-dimensional model for biological methanation in a stirred tank reactor , 2018 .

[39]  Gianfranco Chicco,et al.  Applications of power to gas technologies in emerging electrical systems , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[40]  Iain MacGill,et al.  A Monte Carlo based decision-support tool for assessing generation portfolios in future carbon constrained electricity industries , 2012 .

[41]  Carlos Ocampo-Martinez,et al.  Advances in alkaline water electrolyzers: A review , 2019, Journal of Energy Storage.

[42]  David Fischer,et al.  Real live demonstration of MPC for a power-to-gas plant , 2018, Applied Energy.