Application of an adaptive method for integrated assessment of water allocation issues in the Namoi river catchment, Australia.

Integrated Assessment is increasingly being applied to manage natural resource problems internationally. The development of Integrated Assessment models requires application of an adaptive process of model development, incorporating both stakeholder and scientific knowledge in model development. Such a process should allow the development of trust between stakeholders and scientists to help overcome conflicts arising from model application. This paper outlines one such adaptive approach to Integrated Assessment modelling. It examines an integrated assessment model which has been developed using this process to assess long term outcomes of management options for water allocation in the Namoi River catchment, Australia. The development of this tool has been undertaken using an iterative approach with key stakeholders. The approach embraces collaboration with relevant stakeholder groups on the issues to be addressed by the model (conceptualisation, regional discretisation, system knowledge, scenario framing and results) and preferred future directions of model development. A key aspect of the model framework is that it has been developed to be sufficiently general for reapplication and extension to a wide range of water allocation issues in other catchments. Lessons are drawn from this experience in framework development for the field of integrated assessment.

[1]  M. Rosegrant,et al.  Modeling water resources management at the basin level: review and future directions , 2018 .

[2]  J. P. Nortona,et al.  Sensitivity-Assessment Needs of Complex Simulation Models for Integrated Catchment Management , 2003 .

[3]  Rebecca Letcher,et al.  Issues in integrated assessment and modelling for catchment management , 2002 .

[4]  A. Jakeman,et al.  Development of a simple, catchment-scale, rainfall-evapotranspiration-runoff model , 1998 .

[5]  Ximing Cai,et al.  Integrated economichydrologic water modeling at the basin scale: the Maipo river basin , 2000 .

[6]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Integrated assessment: A growing child on its way to maturity , 1996 .

[7]  A. Jakeman,et al.  Computation of the instantaneous unit hydrograph and identifiable component flows with application to two small upland catchments , 1990 .

[8]  E. and,et al.  Integrated assessment models of global climate change , 1997 .

[9]  R. B. Grayson,et al.  Application of AEAM (Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management) to Water Quality in the Latrobe River Catchment , 1994 .

[10]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Participative and Stakeholder-Based Policy Design, Evaluation and Modeling Processes , 2002 .

[11]  Cisca Joldersma,et al.  Methodology for participatory policy analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  Uncertainty in perspective , 1996 .

[13]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Progress in integrated assessment and modelling , 2002, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Model development for integrated assessment of water allocation options , 2004 .

[15]  A. Jakeman,et al.  Sensitivity Testing of a Biophysical Toolbox for Exploring Water Resources Utilisation and Management Options , 2002 .

[16]  Julian Park,et al.  Integrative research and sustainable agriculture , 1996 .

[17]  Nicole Rijkens-Klomp,et al.  A look in the mirror: reflection on participation in Integrated Assessment from a methodological perspective , 2002 .

[18]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Design of multi-paradigm integrating modelling tools for ecological research , 2000, Environ. Model. Softw..

[19]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  IWRAM: An integrated modelling toolbox for considering impacts of development and land use change in Northern Thailand , 2002 .

[20]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Integrated assessment and modelling: features, principles and examples for catchment management , 2003, Environ. Model. Softw..

[21]  Anand Patwardhan,et al.  Assessing integrated assessments , 1996 .