Difficult Business Models of Digital Business Platforms for Health Data: A Framework for Evaluation of the Ecosystem Viability

Cross-organizational platforms with a purpose to enable the exchange of data about their patients face not only technical challenges but also challenges for the viability of the business model of their ecosystem. Regional healthcare information systems (RHIS) have been evaluated from many aspects, like utility, process improvement, benefits to users and patients and cost savings. However these evaluations do not explain the problems in the viability of their ecosystems. This paper develops an ecosystem evaluation framework (EEF) based on platform theories and theory of constraints (TOC). It demonstrates how EEF is used in evaluation of a RHIS to explain its problems in viability. EEF is composed of a model and a method. The model defines the ecosystem: The platform, the producers and consumers, other stakeholders, the friction between the producers and consumers, the transactions reducing that friction, and the goals of the ecosystem and the goals of its stakeholders. The method applies following criteria: Does the platform serve its purpose in reducing the friction between producers and consumers, does the platform benefit every stakeholder in the ecosystem enabling them achieve more of their own goals, does the platform solve the chicken-andegg problem, reach the critical mass, create network effects and does the improvement of the platform benefit every stakeholder. Using EEF in evaluation of RHIS reveals the inherent difficulties for digital business platforms, specifically when the ecosystem consists of both public and private organizations with mismatching goals. In the future EEF helps to address these problems early on.

[1]  Boaz Ronen,et al.  Focused Operations Management for Health Services Organizations , 2006 .

[2]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy , 2013 .

[3]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy--and How to Make Them Work for You , 2016 .

[4]  Nicholas L. Johnson,et al.  Modern Monopolies: What It Takes to Dominate the 21st Century Economy , 2016 .

[5]  David S. Evans,et al.  Platform Economics: Essays on Multi-Sided Businesses , 2011 .

[6]  Timo Itälä,et al.  Seamless Service Chains and Information Processes , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  Collective action for a common service platform for independent living services , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[8]  Roel Wieringa,et al.  Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering , 2014, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[9]  Mahesh Gupta,et al.  Theory of constraints: a theory for operations management , 2008 .

[10]  Harry Bouwman,et al.  Networked enterprise business model alignment: A case study on smart living , 2015, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[11]  A.H.M. van Limburg,et al.  Towards Innovative Business Modeling for Sustainable eHealth Applications , 2010, 2010 Second International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine.

[13]  Paul Lillrank,et al.  Applying the Theory of Constraints to Health Technology Assessment , 2010 .

[14]  Robert Winter,et al.  A viability theory for digital businesses: Exploring the evolutionary changes of revenue mechanisms to support managerial decisions , 2016, Information Systems Frontiers.

[15]  Harry Bouwman,et al.  Business Model Innovation Paths and Tools , 2016, Bled eConference.

[16]  Johanna Kaipio,et al.  User experiences with different regional health information exchange systems in Finland , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[17]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Business Model Generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengers , 2010 .

[18]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[19]  Annabelle Gawer,et al.  TOWARDS A GENERAL THEORY OF TECHNOLOGICAL PLATFORMS , 2010 .

[20]  Matti Hämäläinen,et al.  Active life home: a portal-based home care platform , 2012, PETRA '12.

[21]  T. Mäenpää,et al.  Implementing the Regional Information System to Integrate Social And Health Care Services – From Data Transfer towards Effective Care , 2009 .

[22]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[23]  T. Mäenpää The outcomes of regional health information exchange in health care delivery , 2012 .

[24]  Paula Asikainen,et al.  Usefulness of a Regional Health Care Information System in primary care: A case study , 2008, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[25]  James F. Moore The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems , 1996 .

[26]  A. Gawer,et al.  How Companies Become Platform Leaders , 2008 .

[27]  Anne Kuusisto,et al.  Experiences with the Electronic Nursing Discharge Summary , 2009, Nursing Informatics.

[28]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Finnish Health Care System: A Value Based Perspective , 2009 .