First-order accurate finite difference schemes for boundary vorticity approximations in curvilinear geometries

In this work we develop first-order accurate, forward finite difference schemes for the first derivative on both a uniform and a non-uniform grid. The schemes are applied to the calculation of vorticity on a solid wall of a curvilinear, two-dimensional channel. The von Mises coordinates are used to transform the governing equations, and map the irregular domain onto a rectangular computational domain. Vorticity on the solid boundary is expressed in terms of the first partial derivative of the square of the speed of the flow in the computational domain, and the derived finite difference schemes are used to calculate the vorticity at the computational boundary grid points using combinations of up to five computational domain grid points. This work extends previous work (Awartani et al., 2005) [3] in which higher-order schemes were obtained for the first derivative using up to four computational domain grid points. The aim here is to shed further light onto the use of first-order accurate non-uniform finite difference schemes that are essential when the von Mises transformation is used. Results show that the best schemes are those that use a natural sequence of non-uniform grid points. It is further shown that for non-uniform grid with clustering near the boundary, solution deteriorates with increasing number of grid points used. By contrast, when a uniform grid is used, solution improves with increasing number of grid points used.

[1]  Xiaolin Zhong,et al.  Derivation of high-order compact finite difference schemes for non-uniform grid using polynomial interpolation , 2005 .

[2]  R. Agarwal A third-order-accurate upwind scheme for Navier-Stokes solutions in three dimensions , 1981 .

[3]  M. H. Hamdan Plenary lecture 5: recent developments in the von Mises transformation and its applications in the computational sciences , 2009 .

[4]  A survey of some second‐order difference schemes for the steady‐state convection–diffusion equation , 1983 .

[5]  Jiten C. Kalita,et al.  A fourth-order accurate compact scheme for the solution of steady Navier–Stokes equations on non-uniform grids , 2008 .

[6]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  On the use of higher-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes , 2002 .

[7]  Eugenia Kálnay de Rivas On the use of nonuniform grids in finite-difference equations , 1972 .

[8]  Jie Wang,et al.  High order compact computation and nonuniform grids for streamfunction vorticity equations , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[9]  Mikhail Shashkov,et al.  The sensitivity and accuracy of fourth order finite-difference schemes on nonuniform grids in one dimension , 1995 .

[10]  W. Spotz Formulation and experiments with high‐order compact schemes for nonuniform grids , 1998 .

[11]  R. Barron Computation of incompressible potential flow using von Mises coordinates , 1989 .

[12]  C. Fletcher Computational techniques for fluid dynamics , 1992 .

[13]  M. H. Hamdan,et al.  Computational complexities and streamfunction coordinates , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[14]  A. Veldman,et al.  Playing with nonuniform grids , 1992 .