Long-range electrostatic attraction between like-charge spheres in a charged pore

The existence of long-range attractive electrostatic forces between particles of like charge is one of the great current controversies ofcolloid science. The established theory (Derjaguin–Landau–Vervey–Overbeek; DLVO) of colloidal interactions predicts that an isolated pair of like-charged colloidal spheres in an electrolyte should experience a purely repulsive screened electrostatic (coulombic) interaction,. Direct measurements of such interactions have shown quantitative agreement with DLVO theory. Recent experiments, however, provide evidence that the effective interparticle potential can have a long-range attractive component in more concentrated suspensions, and for particles confined by charged glass walls,,. It is apparent that the long-range attraction in concentrated systems is due to multi-body interactions and may have a similar explanation to the attraction observed for otherwise confined colloids. Theoretical explanations have been proposed but remain the subject of controversy,. Here we present a quantitative theoretical explanation of these attractive forces between confined colloidal particles, based on direct solutions of the nonlinear Poisson–Boltzmann equation for two like-charged spheres confined in a cylindrical charged pore. The calculations show that the attraction may be explained by the redistribution of the electric double layers of ions and counterions in solution around the spheres, owing to the presence of the wall; there is thus no need to revise the established concepts underlying theories of colloidal interactions.

[1]  M. D. Carbajal-Tinoco,et al.  Static properties of confined colloidal suspensions. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[2]  D. A. Saville,et al.  Colloidal Dispersions: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS , 1989 .

[3]  D. Grier,et al.  When Like Charges Attract: The Effects of Geometrical Confinement on Long-Range Colloidal Interactions. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[4]  T. Okubo,et al.  Ordered structure in dilute solutions of highly charged polymer lattices as studied by microscopy. I. Interparticle distance as a function of latex concentration , 1983 .

[5]  R. Hastings On the crystallization of macroionic solutions , 1978 .

[6]  Wasan,et al.  Attractive Interaction between Similarly Charged Colloidal Particles , 1996, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[7]  Fraden,et al.  Attractive potential between confined colloids at low ionic strength. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[8]  Grier,et al.  Microscopic measurement of the pair interaction potential of charge-stabilized colloid. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[9]  Norio Ise,et al.  On the electrostatic interaction in macroionic solutions , 1984 .

[10]  David G. Grier,et al.  Like-charge attractions in metastable colloidal crystallites , 1997, Nature.

[11]  David G. Grier,et al.  Optical tweezers in colloid and interface science , 1997 .

[12]  I. Sogami Effective potential between charged spherical particles in dilute suspension , 1983 .

[13]  D. Grier,et al.  Methods of Digital Video Microscopy for Colloidal Studies , 1996 .

[14]  E. Verwey,et al.  Theory of the stability of lyophobic colloids. , 1955, The Journal of physical and colloid chemistry.

[15]  Jean-Pierre Hansen,et al.  VAN DER WAALS-LIKE INSTABILITY IN SUSPENSIONS OF MUTUALLY REPELLING CHARGED COLLOIDS , 1997 .

[16]  Bowen,et al.  Adaptive Finite-Element Solution of the Nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann Equation: A Charged Spherical Particle at Various Distances from a Charged Cylindrical Pore in a Charged Planar Surface , 1997, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[17]  B. Derjaguin,et al.  Theory of the stability of strongly charged lyophobic sols and of the adhesion of strongly charged particles in solutions of electrolytes , 1993 .

[18]  B. Tata,et al.  AMORPHOUS CLUSTERING IN HIGHLY CHARGED DILUTE POLY(CHLOROSTYRENE-STYRENE SULFONATE) COLLOIDS , 1997 .