Boundary extension: Insights from signal detection theory.

After viewing a scene, people often remember having seen more of the world than was originally visible, an error referred to as boundary extension. Despite the large number of studies on this phenomenon, performance has never been considered in terms of signal detection theory (SDT). We report two visual memory experiments that allowed us to explore boundary extension in terms of SDT. In our experiments, participants first studied pictures presented as close-up or wide-angle views. At test, either the identical view or a different view (a closer or wider angle version of the same scene) were presented and participants rated the test image as being the same or different than before on a 6-point scale. We found that both discrimination sensitivity and bias contributed to the boundary extension effect. The discrimination sensitivity difference was at least 28%, and its presence refuted the hypothesis that boundary extension was due solely to participants' response bias to label test pictures as more wide-angled. Instead, our results support the idea that participants' responses reflect false memory beyond the view (i.e., a more wide-angle view of the world).

[1]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  An analysis of the total least squares problem , 1980, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[2]  A. Michotte,et al.  La perception de la causalite , 1956 .

[3]  T. Wickens Elementary Signal Detection Theory , 2001 .

[4]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[5]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Error-in-the-Variables Bias in Nonlinear Contexts , 1970 .

[6]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[7]  Benjamin A. McDunn,et al.  Seeking the boundary of boundary extension , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[8]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[9]  H. Intraub Rethinking Scene Perception , 2010 .

[10]  P. Kellman,et al.  Surface interpolation and 3D relatability. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[11]  C. Gottesman,et al.  Mental layout extrapolations prime spatial processing of scenes. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  H. Intraub,et al.  Wide-angle memories of close-up scenes. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  M. Bar Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  T. Hubbard,et al.  Boundary extension: Findings and theories , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[17]  Hongjing Lu,et al.  When a never-seen but less-occluded image is better recognized: evidence from old-new memory experiments. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[18]  H. Intraub The representation of visual scenes , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  H. Intraub,et al.  Beyond the Edges of a View: Boundary Extension in Human Scene-Selective Visual Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[20]  Helene Intraub,et al.  Rethinking visual scene perception. , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[21]  M. Georgeson Sensory, perceptual and response biases: the criterion concept in perception , 2012 .

[22]  Christopher A. Dickinson,et al.  False Memory 1/20th of a Second Later , 2008, Psychological science.

[23]  Hongjing Lu,et al.  When a never-seen but less-occluded image is better recognized: evidence from same-different matching experiments and a model. , 2009, Journal of vision.