The Effects of Gifted and Talented Programs on Academic Self-Concept: The Big Fish Strikes Again

Participation in gifted and talented (G&T) programs is predicted to have negative effects on academic—but not nonacademic—self-concept on the basis of social comparison theory and Marsh’s big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE). In two studies, students in G&T programs experienced systematic declines in three components of academic self-concept (Reading, Math, School) over time and in relation to matched comparison students in regular mixed ability classrooms, but not in four components of nonacademic self-concept (Physical, Appearance, Peer Relations, Parent Relations). In both studies, these results were consistent over gender, age, and initial ability level. Selection criteria, program strategies, and advice to parents are proposed to counteract this BFLPE and to maximize the benefits associated with G&T programs.

[1]  H. Marsh,et al.  The Negative Effects of School-Average Ability on Academic Self-Concept: An Application of Multilevel Modelling , 1996 .

[2]  H. Marsh,et al.  Multidimensional Self-concepts of Elite Athletes: How Do They Differ from the General Population? , 1995 .

[3]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Using the National Longitudinal Study of 1988 to evaluate theoretical models of self-concept: The Self-Description Questionnaire. , 1994 .

[4]  Joseph S. Renzulli,et al.  Exploring the Link Between Giftedness and Self-Concept , 1993 .

[5]  Miraca U. M. Gross.  Exceptionally Gifted Children , 1993 .

[6]  L. Hildman,et al.  Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test , 1993 .

[7]  H. Marsh.  Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement, and research. , 1993 .

[8]  Deborah J. Stipek,et al.  Motivation to Learn: From Theory to Practice , 1992 .

[9]  Carole A. Ames.  Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. , 1992 .

[10]  Lori C. Bland,et al.  Characteristics of Elementary Students Entering Gifted Programs: The Learning Outcomes Project at the University of Virginia , 1992 .

[11]  Susan Harter,et al.  The relationship between perceived competence, affect, and motivational orientation within the classroom: Processes and patterns of change. , 1992 .

[12]  Thane S. Pittman,et al.  Achievement and motivation : a social-developmental perspective , 1992 .

[13]  H. Marsh,et al.  Self-Concepts of Young Children 5 to 8 Years of Age: Measurement and Multidimensional Structure , 1991 .

[14]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Failure of High-Ability High Schools to Deliver Academic Benefits Commensurate With Their Students’ Ability Levels , 1991 .

[15]  J. Feldhusen,et al.  Conducting Research and Evaluation in Gifted Education: A Handbook of Methods and Applications , 1991 .

[16]  G. A. Davis,et al.  Handbook of Gifted Education , 1991 .

[17]  H. Marsh.  Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. , 1990 .

[18]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Achievement Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis , 1990 .

[19]  Ellen B. Goldring.  Assessing the status of information on classroom organizational frameworks for gifted students. , 1990 .

[20]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification , 1990 .

[21]  H. Marsh.  Self-Concepts of Young Children Aged 5 to 8: Their Measurement and Multidimensional Structure. , 1990 .

[22]  H. Marsh.  Influences of internal and external frames of reference on the formation of math and English self-concepts. , 1990 .

[23]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. , 1989 .

[24]  R. Wylie.  Measures of Self-Concept , 1989 .

[25]  D. Reuman,et al.  How social comparison mediates the relation between ability-grouping practices and students' achievement expectancies in mathematics. , 1989 .

[26]  John G. Nicholls,et al.  The Competitive Ethos and Democratic Education , 1989 .

[27]  B. Byrne,et al.  Social relations of gifted children as a function of age and school program , 1989 .

[28]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  A Multifaceted Academic Self-Concept: Its Hierarchical Structure and Its Relation to Academic Achievement. , 1988 .

[29]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept , 1987 .

[30]  G. Willis,et al.  Changes in the Self-Perceptions of Gifted Students who Participate in Rigorous Academic Programs , 1987 .

[31]  B. Schneider.  The gifted child in peer group perspective , 1987 .

[32]  M. Petty,et al.  Job sharing in teaching: attitudes of teachers employed by the New South Wales Department of Education , 1986 .

[33]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Elementary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis , 1986 .

[34]  F. D. Horowitz,et al.  The Gifted and Talented: Developmental Perspectives , 1985 .

[35]  J. Oakes,et al.  Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. , 1986 .

[36]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Self-Concept: Its Multifaceted, Hierarchical Structure , 1985 .

[37]  J. Coleman,et al.  Special-Class Placement, Level of Intelligence, and the Self-Concepts of Gifted Children: A Social Comparison Perspective , 1985 .

[38]  L. Fox,et al.  Programs for the gifted and talented: Past, present, and future. , 1985 .

[39]  B. Byrne.  The General/Academic Self-Concept Nomological Network: A Review of Construct Validation Research , 1984 .

[40]  Rhona S. Weinstein,et al.  Classroom Factors Affecting Students’ Self-Evaluations: An Interactional Model , 1984 .

[41]  H. Marsh.  Self-concept: The Application of a Frame of Reference Model to Explain Paradoxical Results , 1984 .

[42]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well? , 1984 .

[43]  H. Marsh.  Self-Concept, Social Comparison, and Ability Grouping: A Reply to Kulik and Kulik , 1984 .

[44]  M. Print.  Education for Gifted Children: The Australian Scenario and Implications for Teacher Educators , 1983 .

[45]  J. Coleman,et al.  Self‐concept and the gifted child∗ , 1983 .

[46]  J. Coleman,et al.  Self-Concept and the Gifted Classroom: The Role of Social Comparisons , 1982 .

[47]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Psychological perspectives on the self , 1982 .

[48]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effects of Ability Grouping on Secondary School Students: A Meta-analysis of Evaluation Findings , 1981 .

[49]  Sharon Seidman Milburn,et al.  [Self concept]. , 1978, Revista del Colegio Nacional de Enfermeras.

[50]  Jacob Beck,et al.  Adaptation-level theory. , 1974 .

[51]  James A. Davis,et al.  The Campus as a Frog Pond: An Application of the Theory of Relative Deprivation to Career Decisions of College Men , 1966, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  H. Helson,et al.  Adaptation-level theory , 1964 .

[53]  R. Wylie,et al.  The Self Concept , 1962 .

[54]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .