Through Thick and Thin? How Self-determination Drives the Corporate Sustainability Initiatives of Multinational Subsidiaries

Multinational corporation (MNC) subsidiaries implement corporate sustainability initiatives (CSIs) if they are self-determined to do so (based on intrinsic motivation) or when urged on by circumstances and pressures (based on extrinsic motivation). Such differences in self-determination are derived from underlying corporate psychological needs for competence, autonomy and relatedness, and are manifested in the governance choices of making, allying or buying CSIs. In this study of oil and gas MNC subsidiaries in the developing country context of Trinidad and Tobago, four distinct types of firm are identified based on their levels of self-determination and corporate governance tendencies. These groups are identified as trail blazers, marching soldiers, sharp shooters and fire fighters, and their distinctive characteristics are described. These findings are useful to corporate sustainability strategists seeking to select, design and implement CSIs that satisfy MNC headquarter directives but balance subsidiary objectives of maintaining good relations and access to operate in developing countries. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

[1]  K. Basu,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Model of Sensemaking , 2008 .

[2]  Stan Oliver,et al.  How to develop knowledge culture in organizations? A multiple case study of large distributed organizations , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[3]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[4]  S. Lo,et al.  Is Corporate Sustainability a Value-Increasing Strategy for Business? , 2007 .

[5]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[6]  V. Swaen,et al.  Organizational Stages and Cultural Phases: A Critical Review and a Consolidative Model of Corporate Social Responsibility Development , 2010 .

[7]  Kalim U. Shah.  Organizational Legitimacy and the Strategic Bridging Ability of Green Alliances , 2011 .

[8]  Bryan W. Husted,et al.  Governance Choice for Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility , 2010 .

[9]  D. Windsor.  Corporate Social Responsibility: Three Key Approaches , 2006 .

[10]  T. Gladwin,et al.  Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research , 1995 .

[11]  Ricky Y. K. Chan,et al.  Does the Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm Apply in an Emerging Economy? A Survey of Foreign Invested Enterprises in China , 2005 .

[12]  Kalim U. Shah.  Corporate environmentalism in a small emerging economy: stakeholder perceptions and the influence of firm characteristics , 2011 .

[13]  C. Egri,et al.  Leadership in the North American Environmental Sector: Values, Leadership Styles, and Contexts of Environmental Leaders and their Organizations , 2000 .

[14]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters‐subsidiary relations , 1994 .

[15]  Ivan Montiel,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability , 2008 .

[16]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[17]  Pratima Bansal,et al.  Strategic Explanations for the Early Adoption of ISO 14001 , 2003 .

[18]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[19]  John H. Grant,et al.  Construct Measurement in Organizational Strategy Research: A Critique and Proposal , 1986 .

[20]  Kalim U. Shah,et al.  Do industry associations influence corporate environmentalism in developing countries? Evidence from Trinidad and Tobago , 2013 .

[21]  Kalim U. Shah.  Strategic organizational drivers of corporate environmental responsibility in the Caribbean hotel industry , 2011 .

[22]  S. Benn,et al.  Organizational Change for Corporate Sustainability , 2014 .

[23]  Ans Kolk,et al.  Poverty Alleviation as Business Strategy? Evaluating Commitments of Frontrunner Multinational Corporations , 2006 .

[24]  Ruth V. Aguilera,et al.  Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: a Multi-Level Theory of Social Change in Organizations , 2004 .

[25]  E. Deci,et al.  A motivational approach to self: integration in personality. , 1990, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[26]  T. Kostova,et al.  Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects , 2002 .

[27]  L. L. Rodrigues,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives , 2006 .

[28]  Kalim U. Shah,et al.  Export processing zones and corporate environmental performance in emerging economies: The case of the oil, gas, and chemical sectors of Trinidad and Tobago , 2007 .

[29]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  Social Issues and Management: Our Lost Cause Found , 2003 .

[30]  M. V. Marrewijk.  Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion , 2013 .

[31]  M. Toffel,et al.  Stakeholders and Environmental Management Practices: An Institutional Framework , 2004 .

[32]  U. Steger,et al.  The economic foundations of corporate sustainability , 2007 .

[33]  B. Husted,et al.  Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance* , 2006 .

[34]  Reginald A. Litz.  A resource-based-view of the socially responsible firm: Stakeholder interdependence, ethical awareness, and issue responsiveness as strategic assets , 1996 .

[35]  P. Bansal.  Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development , 2005 .