Hybrid T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia

The objective of our study was to evaluate the role of a hybrid T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging for the differentiation of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa). Eight patients with PCa who underwent preoperative 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostatectomy were included in this study. Patients underwent a hybrid T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging examination consisting of diffusion-weighted images acquired with the echo times (TEs) of 47, 75 and 100 ms and b-values of 0, 750 and 1500 s/mm2. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), T2 constant and signal intensity of DWI at the highest b-value were selected as features separately or combined with either linear discriminant analysis (LDA) or quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) classifier to differentiate BPH and PCa. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and leave-one-out cross validation were used to evaluate the accuracy of the classification. The maximum area under curve (AUC) of the ADC, T2 and signal intensity of DWI in classifying BPH and PCa were 0.80 ± 0.07, 0.78 ± 0.09 and 0.82 ± 0.07, respectively. The maximum AUC of the LDA or QDA classifier output in the same task was 0.93 ± 0.04 or 0.98 ± 0.02, respectively. Thus, hybrid MRI measures the response of ADC and T2 to changing TEs and b-values, respectively. This approach combines ADC at different TEs and T2 at different b-values and is effective in designing the classifier to differentiate BPH and PCa tissue.

[1]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2016 , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[2]  Y. Liu,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic carcinoma: correlation with angiogenesis. , 2008, Clinical radiology.

[3]  Aytekin Oto,et al.  Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: evaluation by using multiparametric endorectal MR imaging. , 2013, Radiology.

[4]  Geert J. S. Litjens,et al.  Distinguishing prostate cancer from benign confounders via a cascaded classifier on multi-parametric MRI , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[5]  Amita Shukla-Dave,et al.  The role of MRI and MRSI in diagnosis, treatment selection, and post-treatment follow-up for prostate cancer. , 2009, Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O.

[6]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  Zhen Jiang,et al.  Application evaluation of MR diffusion weighted imaging in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of early prostate cancer , 2014 .

[8]  Aytekin Oto,et al.  Hybrid multidimensional T2 and diffusion‐weighted MRI for prostate cancer detection , 2014, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  M. Schouten,et al.  Predictive value of MRI in the localization, staging, volume estimation, assessment of aggressiveness, and guidance of radiotherapy and biopsies in prostate cancer , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  S. Emad-Eldin,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging and ADC measurement in normal prostate, benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate carcinoma , 2014 .

[11]  Xiaohan Liu,et al.  Biexponential Apparent Diffusion Coefficients Values in the Prostate: Comparison among Normal Tissue, Prostate Cancer, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostatitis , 2013, Korean journal of radiology.

[12]  Ambereen Yousuf,et al.  Pilot Study of the Use of Hybrid Multidimensional T2-Weighted Imaging-DWI for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Evaluation of Gleason Score. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Aytekin Oto,et al.  Prostate cancer: differentiation of central gland cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 2010, Radiology.

[14]  H. Shinmoto,et al.  Prostate cancer screening: The clinical value of diffusion‐weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2‐weighted imaging , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Jelle O. Barentsz,et al.  Prostate MRI: diffusion-weighted imaging at 1.5T correlates better with prostatectomy Gleason grades than TRUS-guided biopsies in peripheral zone tumours , 2012, European Radiology.

[16]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Multiparametric MRI and prostate cancer diagnosis and risk stratification , 2012, Current opinion in urology.

[17]  Feng Hua Li,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography with contrast‐tuned imaging technology for the detection of prostate cancer: comparison with conventional ultrasonography , 2012, BJU international.

[18]  T. Sone,et al.  Value of preoperative 3T multiparametric MRI for surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  R. Reiter,et al.  Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging as a management decision tool , 2017, Translational andrology and urology.

[20]  Jue Zhang,et al.  Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue based on a computer-aided diagnosis system , 2017, Science China Life Sciences.

[21]  Jiani Hu,et al.  The clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging in diagnosing prostate carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  Ma Wenjun,et al.  Research on detection of prostate cancer MR images based on information fusion , 2014, 2014 12th International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP).